December 4, 20187 yr I was wondering I see that my array is running at 10 - 14 MB/s. Is this normal. I know that when I was running my parity I was getting around 180MB/s on all drives. The time this was taken I was using the Mover Service and moving files from my Cache Pool to the array. I Have Unraid configured to run my Share Allocation method as Most Free instead of the High Water. This is because I wanted the data equally shared on all of my drives. If I were to add more drives would I expect to see this speed go up. How can I increase the transfer rate?
December 4, 20187 yr 3 hours ago, emsbas said: array is running at 10 - 14 MB/s. Is this normal It's normal if you're writing to all disks at the same time, which by the screenshot looks like you are, possibly using most free as allocation method?
December 4, 20187 yr Author Yes I am what I am wondering is if I add more drives to the array would that number increase or decrease. What I have happening is that because of this slow rate my cache is filling up and causing me issues.
December 4, 20187 yr If you care for write speed never user the most free allocation option, when writes switch from one disk to another parity writes will overlap making write speeds very slow, use hight water or fill up and this won't happen, also see turbo write for a faster write method (but still shouldn't be used with most free for best results).
December 4, 20187 yr Author I will give turbo write a try I have not implemented it. My thought process was that if I use Most Free Allocation method I hoped that Unraid would multi thread the writes to the drives which would allow for all of the drives to be use simultaneously. This would mimic the function of striping but not striping by bit but by file.
December 4, 20187 yr Author FYI Turbo Write increased my performance by about 40% which is great. I wonder if there is a way to optimize it more?
December 4, 20187 yr 29 minutes ago, emsbas said: I wonder if there is a way to optimize it more? Don't use fill up.
December 4, 20187 yr Author Yea fill up is counter intuitive I know unraid does a parity but the backup to the parity is having the option to only loose 1 drive worth of data that is on the array
December 4, 20187 yr 57 minutes ago, emsbas said: My thought process was that if I use Most Free Allocation method I hoped that Unraid would multi thread the writes to the drives which would allow for all of the drives to be use simultaneously. It will use them all, and for reads that's fine. Writes all update the parity drive, so every time a write is requested, the system has to wait for the parity drive to commit before it can move on to the next write, regardless of which data drive is involved. If you wanted, I suppose you could get a hardware RAID card that is supported, and RAID0 a bunch of SSD's to use as parity.
December 4, 20187 yr Author Or just Raid 0 two 4tb drives or 4 x tb drives??? Rust Platters?? But doesnt Unraid Dislike that lol Edited December 4, 20187 yr by emsbas
December 4, 20187 yr Author So to the same point if I had 2 parity drives it would be even slower. I wonder if I just try to backup data to another unraid platform and use the slow parity there Then switch this machine to no backup???
December 4, 20187 yr Just now, emsbas said: So to the same point if I had 2 parity drives it would be even slower. It would be the same, assuming both parity disks have the same characteristics/performance.
December 4, 20187 yr Author humm so Raid 0 two 8tb Red's ?? Should give me better performance on my Parity Maybe?
December 4, 20187 yr Likely not by much, the problem are the constant seeks, it would only be significantly faster with raided SSDs as parity.
December 4, 20187 yr Author Any other options being that 8tb of SSD's wont be fun... any thing else any one can think up
December 4, 20187 yr Author What about like a compute drive as my parity drive or a WD Black something with some more Balls??? Instead of a WD Red NAS. Maybe even like a 10k or 15k sas drive?
December 4, 20187 yr 5 minutes ago, emsbas said: Maybe even like a 10k or 15k sas drive? Never tested but doubt it's fast enough.
December 4, 20187 yr Author We would guess it should be better though lol if not I guess ebay 8tb SSD slightly used lol Edited December 4, 20187 yr by emsbas
December 4, 20187 yr Author I am wondering the 8tb Reds are 5400 RPM's Would I see a gain if I switched my Parity drive to an 8TB Barracuda 7200 RPM? Or even a 8tb 7200RPM SAS?
December 4, 20187 yr 11 minutes ago, emsbas said: Would I see a gain if I switched my Parity drive to an 8TB Barracuda 7200 RPM? Possible very small gain. Probably not something you could feel except using a stopwatch and a consistent set of files.
December 4, 20187 yr Author So short of that it is what it is. Unless some how I can find an 8TB SSD for a parity lol. Edited December 4, 20187 yr by emsbas
December 4, 20187 yr FYI Turbo Write increased my performance by about 40% which is great. I wonder if there is a way to optimize it more?What are you doing as speed test here?Sendt fra min ONEPLUS A6003 med Tapatalk
December 4, 20187 yr Author I call it real world speed test lol. I am transferring data from the Cache Drive to the Array that is where I noticed the speed difference. The file sizes are all the same roughly 1.5 to 5 GB
December 4, 20187 yr I call it real world speed test lol. I am transferring data from the Cache Drive to the Array that is where I noticed the speed difference. The file sizes are all the same roughly 1.5 to 5 GBMy point being if it were over network, your bottleneck would probably be network and not the disks with those speeds Sendt fra min ONEPLUS A6003 med Tapatalk
December 4, 20187 yr Author It is over the network but I am running 10GB Lan SFP+ the write speed of the Cache is understandable being that I am transferring from a USB2.0 device but the Cache to Array speed is what doesnt make sense.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.