August 22, 20205 yr Aug 22 14:35:10 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:10 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:12 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:12 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:13 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:13 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:33 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:33 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:37 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:37 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:41 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:41 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:42 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:42 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:44 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:35:44 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:36:01 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:36:01 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:36:03 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:36:03 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:36:12 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:36:12 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:36:13 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 Aug 22 14:36:13 Tower kernel: BTRFS critical (device nvme0n1p1): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=35338338304 slot=38 ino=181793 file_offset=1483358208, invalid offset for file extent, have 65535, should be aligned to 4096 What Should be my next step at this point Edited August 22, 20205 yr by Fiservedpi
August 22, 20205 yr Community Expert Syslog snippets are seldom sufficient. 50 minutes ago, Fiservedpi said: What Should be my next step at this point Go to Tools - Diagnostics and attach the complete Diagnostics ZIP file to your NEXT post.
August 22, 20205 yr Author tower-diagnostics-20200822-1634.zip The odd thing is I can't even get a smart report from the drive I click start quick or extended and nothing happens. Drive is 15 months old wd SN750 Repurposed windows C:/ drive Edited August 22, 20205 yr by Fiservedpi
August 22, 20205 yr Community Expert From diagnostics it looks like that drive is still on 4K alignment though so should be OK with 6.8.3. Doesn't look like anything wrong with drive, and cache is mounted. Let's see if @johnnie.black has anything to say.
August 22, 20205 yr Author Yeah everything is functioning correctly was just worried this all happened after a integrity check, thank you for looking at my diagnostics. Running a parity check now showing 4376 errors with "write corrections" enabled, the parity found errors issue has happened before (only after beta flash) if I run it again it won't find any guess my only mistake was testing out the beta Edited August 22, 20205 yr by Fiservedpi
August 22, 20205 yr Community Expert You should follow the correcting check with a noncorrecting check to make sure there are no errors. If there are still errors then you may have some hardware problem. Also, those lines you posted from the log were about your cache and have nothing to do with the array or the parity check. Possibly you will still have something to deal with there as well.
August 22, 20205 yr Author pretty sure this is whats happening root@Tower:~# smartctl -a -d nvme /dev/nvme0n1 smartctl 7.1 2019-12-30 r5022 [x86_64-linux-4.19.107-Unraid] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-19, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Model Number: WDS250G3X0C-00SJG0 Serial Number: 190556804076 Firmware Version: 102000WD PCI Vendor/Subsystem ID: 0x15b7 IEEE OUI Identifier: 0x001b44 Total NVM Capacity: 250,059,350,016 [250 GB] Unallocated NVM Capacity: 0 Controller ID: 8215 Number of Namespaces: 1 Namespace 1 Size/Capacity: 250,059,350,016 [250 GB] Namespace 1 Formatted LBA Size: 512 Namespace 1 IEEE EUI-64: 001b44 8b44521406 Local Time is: Sat Aug 22 19:40:41 2020 EDT Firmware Updates (0x14): 2 Slots, no Reset required Optional Admin Commands (0x0017): Security Format Frmw_DL Self_Test Optional NVM Commands (0x001f): Comp Wr_Unc DS_Mngmt Wr_Zero Sav/Sel_Feat Maximum Data Transfer Size: 128 Pages Warning Comp. Temp. Threshold: 80 Celsius Critical Comp. Temp. Threshold: 85 Celsius Namespace 1 Features (0x02): NA_Fields Supported Power States St Op Max Active Idle RL RT WL WT Ent_Lat Ex_Lat 0 + 5.00W - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 + 3.50W - - 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 + 3.00W - - 2 2 2 2 0 0 3 - 0.0700W - - 3 3 3 3 4000 10000 4 - 0.0025W - - 4 4 4 4 4000 45000 Supported LBA Sizes (NSID 0x1) Id Fmt Data Metadt Rel_Perf 0 + 512 0 2 1 - 4096 0 1 === START OF SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02) Critical Warning: 0x00 Temperature: 37 Celsius Available Spare: 100% Available Spare Threshold: 10% Percentage Used: 0% Data Units Read: 12,929,240 [6.61 TB] Data Units Written: 25,303,344 [12.9 TB] Host Read Commands: 175,332,187 Host Write Commands: 323,863,517 Controller Busy Time: 493 Power Cycles: 2,795 Power On Hours: 8,211 Unsafe Shutdowns: 79 Media and Data Integrity Errors: 0 Error Information Log Entries: 18 Warning Comp. Temperature Time: 0 Critical Comp. Temperature Time: 0 Error Information (NVMe Log 0x01, max 256 entries) No Errors Logged Mr. Blacks response seems in line with what is happening and your findings when trying to perform an SMART test from CLI i get this Edited August 22, 20205 yr by Fiservedpi
August 23, 20205 yr Community Expert It's not a device problem, there's filesystem corruption, and if there's no other other explanation for the sync errors both are likely caused by a hardware issue, like the overclocked RAM you're running, which is known to corrupt data in some Ryzen systems, see here.
August 24, 20205 yr Author I ended up re-formatting the drive from BTRFS to XFS and seems to be ok now https://wiki.unraid.net/UnRAID_6/Storage_Management#Reformatting_a_drive
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.