-
[Support] devzwf - pihole DoT/DoH
Thanks and again thank you for keeping this alive!
-
[Support] devzwf - pihole DoT/DoH
When doing a clean install your template is empty at the following places You need to fill this to be able to create the docker and without these filled there will not be a appdata directory for this docker. I filled this with: /mnt/user/appdata/pihole-dot-doh/pihole/ /mnt/user/appdata/pihole-dot-doh/dnsmasq.d/ /mnt/user/appdata/pihole-dot-doh/config/ (copied from the original outdated testdasi template) Maybe you can fill these in the template with the above? Makes it a little easier to install for the first time . EDIT: Thank you for keeping this docker alive in unraid!
-
[Support] [Depreciated] FlippinTurt PiHole DoT-DoH
Due to some issues I had for a longer time decided to clean install the docker removing appdata directory for pihole-dot-doh aswell. After the new install it creates the directory with the subdirectories: config, dnsmasq.d and pihole. In the config directory there used to be two yamls for cloudflared and stubby. But they were not placed in there. For some reason my pihole is able to reach both 127.2.2.2@5253 and 127.1.1.1#5153 But I am unable to find where the config files are since I want to edit them.
-
[Support] [Depreciated] FlippinTurt PiHole DoT-DoH
Stubby (DOT/TLS) by default uses google. you can change this in the stubby config file in your appdata by adding # to the google config and removing them from the cloudflare config. If you already did this then perhaps the file got removed or corrupt on the last update and was replaced. I've had issues in the past with cloudflared(DOH/https) but it seems to be working fine for me for a long time now, so consider using that. As in my opinion it is marginally better privacy wise as you will "hide" your dns traffic under the gianourmous load of https traffic. You could use both doh and dot but I do need see the benefit of this.
-
[Support] [Depreciated] FlippinTurt PiHole DoT-DoH
Is is one of the config files that it comes with thr cloudflared config file is for DOH (DNS over https) and the stubby config file is for DOT (DNS over TLS). I am having issues eith DOH so I set The DOT as the first dns server. Since then no issues.
-
[Support] [Depreciated] FlippinTurt PiHole DoT-DoH
Can you try setting stubby(tls) as first and doh as second and see if your issues go away? I have too little knowledge to be certain but DOH seems to cause my issues.
-
[Support] [Depreciated] FlippinTurt PiHole DoT-DoH
I had the cloudflared (DOH) as both options set it back to how it was only changed the stubby (TLS) to cloudflared instead of google. Seems bit better now.. not sure why everything goes to **** with only DOH. (Also maybe it was not very smart of me to have unraid get it's dns by DHCP which would be the phole docker on unraid...)
-
Bleak started following [6.8.3] Cannot reach unraid. and [Support] [Depreciated] FlippinTurt PiHole DoT-DoH
-
[Support] [Depreciated] FlippinTurt PiHole DoT-DoH
I am now also having the following error shown in the logs(see attachment) also fix common problems says I should connect to 8.8.8.8 or github could be down so seems unraid thinks there is no connection anymore. (nothing is being blocked for unraid)
-
[Support] [Depreciated] FlippinTurt PiHole DoT-DoH
Hi when I restart the docker it stops after DNS service is not running it will only continue when I change the /etc/resolv.conf to a dns server instead of 127.0.0.11 It will always revert that change by itself once it has started. While it is stuck there I cannot access the web page. I thought it was because of the server variable but that seems to not care whatever it is (can someone explain to me what that variable is for?) [s6-init] making user provided files available at /var/run/s6/etc...exited 0. [s6-init] ensuring user provided files have correct perms...exited 0. [fix-attrs.d] applying ownership & permissions fixes... [fix-attrs.d] 01-resolver-resolv: applying... [s6-init] making user provided files available at /var/run/s6/etc...exited 0. [s6-init] ensuring user provided files have correct perms...exited 0. [fix-attrs.d] applying ownership & permissions fixes... [fix-attrs.d] 01-resolver-resolv: applying... [fix-attrs.d] 01-resolver-resolv: exited 0. [fix-attrs.d] done. [cont-init.d] executing container initialization scripts... [cont-init.d] 20-start.sh: executing... ::: Starting docker specific checks & setup for docker pihole/pihole [i] Installing configs from /etc/.pihole... [i] Existing dnsmasq.conf found... it is not a Pi-hole file, leaving alone! Converting DNS1 to PIHOLE_DNS_ Converting DNS2 to PIHOLE_DNS_ Setting DNS servers based on PIHOLE_DNS_ variable ::: Pre existing WEBPASSWORD found DNSMasq binding to default interface: eth0 Added ENV to php: "PHP_ERROR_LOG" => "/var/log/lighttpd/error.log", "ServerIP" => "10.11.22.33", "VIRTUAL_HOST" => "10.11.22.33", Using IPv4 ::: Preexisting ad list /etc/pihole/adlists.list detected ((exiting setup_blocklists early)) https://raw.githubusercontent.com/StevenBlack/hosts/master/hosts ::: Testing pihole-FTL DNS: FTL started! ::: Testing lighttpd config: Syntax OK ::: All config checks passed, cleared for startup ... ::: Enabling Query Logging [i] Enabling logging... ::: Docker start setup complete [✗] DNS service is not running [i] Neutrino emissions detected...
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - SWAG - Secure Web Application Gateway (Nginx/PHP/Certbot/Fail2ban)
I swear I've searched this whole thing 10 times no clue how I missed this... Thanks anyway sorry for missing this..
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - SWAG - Secure Web Application Gateway (Nginx/PHP/Certbot/Fail2ban)
Added --cap-add=NET_ADMIN to extra parameters. Found it somewhere in a forum apparently it should be mentioned somewhere that you need this but could not find it. Can someone link me something that explains what this does exactly? (or tell me ofcourse) want to understand what i just did and why i missed it..
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - SWAG - Secure Web Application Gateway (Nginx/PHP/Certbot/Fail2ban)
Hey so I am trying to setup basic auth with fail2ban and the authenticating is working great but fail2ban does not seem to do it's part: 020-05-09 18:31:32,502 fail2ban.filter [388]: INFO [nginx-http-auth] Found 84.241.199.134 - 2020-05-09 18:31:31 2020-05-09 18:31:38,515 fail2ban.filter [388]: INFO [nginx-http-auth] Found 84.241.199.134 - 2020-05-09 18:31:37 2020-05-09 18:31:43,727 fail2ban.filter [388]: INFO [nginx-http-auth] Found 84.241.199.134 - 2020-05-09 18:31:43 2020-05-09 18:31:44,462 fail2ban.actions [388]: NOTICE [nginx-http-auth] Ban 84.241.199.134 2020-05-09 18:31:44,465 fail2ban.utils [388]: #39-Lev. 1501c3a14110 -- exec: iptables -w -N f2b-nginx-http-auth iptables -w -A f2b-nginx-http-auth -j RETURN iptables -w -I INPUT -p tcp -m multiport --dports http,https -j f2b-nginx-http-auth 2020-05-09 18:31:44,466 fail2ban.utils [388]: ERROR 1501c3a14110 -- stderr: "iptables v1.8.3 (legacy): can't initialize iptables table `filter': Permission denied (you must be root)" 2020-05-09 18:31:44,466 fail2ban.utils [388]: ERROR 1501c3a14110 -- stderr: 'Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded.' 2020-05-09 18:31:44,466 fail2ban.utils [388]: ERROR 1501c3a14110 -- stderr: "iptables v1.8.3 (legacy): can't initialize iptables table `filter': Permission denied (you must be root)" 2020-05-09 18:31:44,466 fail2ban.utils [388]: ERROR 1501c3a14110 -- stderr: 'Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded.' 2020-05-09 18:31:44,466 fail2ban.utils [388]: ERROR 1501c3a14110 -- stderr: 'getsockopt failed strangely: Operation not permitted' 2020-05-09 18:31:44,466 fail2ban.utils [388]: ERROR 1501c3a14110 -- returned 1 2020-05-09 18:31:44,467 fail2ban.actions [388]: ERROR Failed to execute ban jail 'nginx-http-auth' action 'iptables-multiport' info 'ActionInfo({'ip': '84.241.199.134', 'family': 'inet4', 'fid': <function Actions.ActionInfo.<lambda> at 0x1501c3ece3a0>, 'raw-ticket': <function Actions.ActionInfo.<lambda> at 0x1501c3ece940>})': Error starting action Jail('nginx-http-auth')/iptables-multiport 2020-05-09 18:31:48,940 fail2ban.filter [388]: INFO [nginx-http-auth] Found 84.241.199.134 - 2020-05-09 18:31:48 2020-05-09 18:31:54,150 fail2ban.filter [388]: INFO [nginx-http-auth] Found 84.241.199.134 - 2020-05-09 18:31:54 2020-05-09 18:31:59,362 fail2ban.filter [388]: INFO [nginx-http-auth] Found 84.241.199.134 - 2020-05-09 18:31:58 2020-05-09 18:31:59,686 fail2ban.actions [388]: NOTICE [nginx-http-auth] 84.241.199.134 already banned 2020-05-09 18:32:05,374 fail2ban.filter [388]: INFO [nginx-http-auth] Found 84.241.199.134 - 2020-05-09 18:32:04 Basically trying from my phone on 4g to get myself banned but i can just keep retrying even though max retry's is at 3 if i try it for the 10th time and enter it correctly i just get in. dont know what the above errors mean tried to google it but did not find anything that helped me..
-
Release: Folding@Home Docker
Found this post on LTT root@fold8:~# cd /var/lib/fahclient/work/ root@fold8:/var/lib/fahclient/work# ls -alh total 72K drwxrwxrwx 3 fahclient root 4.0K Mar 9 19:00 . drwxrwxr-x 6 fahclient root 4.0K Feb 28 20:36 .. drwxrwxrwx 3 fahclient root 4.0K Mar 9 19:17 00 -rw-r--r-- 1 fahclient root 40K Mar 9 19:17 client.db -rw-r--r-- 1 fahclient root 17K Mar 9 19:17 client.db-journal Should be like this so not sure why it creates them as drwxr-xr-x.
-
Release: Folding@Home Docker
root@Zeus:/mnt/user/appdata/FoldingAtHome/work# ls -alh total 56K drwxr-xr-x 1 nobody users 78 Mar 16 22:45 ./ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 107 Mar 16 20:21 ../ drwxr-xr-x 1 nobody users 42 Mar 16 23:12 00/ drwxr-xr-x 1 nobody users 224 Mar 16 23:14 01/ drwxr-xr-x 1 nobody users 4.0K Mar 16 23:24 02/ -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody users 32K Mar 16 23:25 client.db -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody users 17K Mar 16 23:25 client.db-journal This does not seem right..? Just deleted the folder using krusader but no clue if it will return after next WU finishes.
-
Release: Folding@Home Docker
21:46:07:WU02:FS00:0xa7:Completed 1 out of 125000 steps (0%) 21:46:32:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up 21:46:32:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Failed to remove directory './work/00': boost::filesystem::remove: Directory not empty: "./work/00" 21:47:56:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 80000 out of 1000000 steps (8%) 21:48:10:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up 21:48:10:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Failed to remove directory './work/00': boost::filesystem::remove: Directory not empty: "./work/00" 21:49:58:WU02:FS00:0xa7:Completed 1250 out of 125000 steps (1%) 21:50:47:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up 21:50:47:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Failed to remove directory './work/00': boost::filesystem::remove: Directory not empty: "./work/00" 21:51:36:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 90000 out of 1000000 steps (9%) 21:53:53:WU02:FS00:0xa7:Completed 2500 out of 125000 steps (2%) 21:55:01:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up 21:55:01:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Failed to remove directory './work/00': boost::filesystem::remove: Directory not empty: "./work/00" 21:55:16:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 100000 out of 1000000 steps (10%) 21:57:36:WU02:FS00:0xa7:Completed 3750 out of 125000 steps (3%) 21:59:33:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 110000 out of 1000000 steps (11%) 22:01:30:WU02:FS00:0xa7:Completed 5000 out of 125000 steps (4%) 22:01:53:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up 22:01:53:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Failed to remove directory './work/00': boost::filesystem::remove: Directory not empty: "./work/00" 22:03:14:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 120000 out of 1000000 steps (12%) 22:05:21:WU02:FS00:0xa7:Completed 6250 out of 125000 steps (5%) 22:06:54:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 130000 out of 1000000 steps (13%) 22:09:10:WU02:FS00:0xa7:Completed 7500 out of 125000 steps (6%) 22:10:35:WU01:FS01:0x22:Completed 140000 out of 1000000 steps (14%) 22:12:58:WU00:FS00:Cleaning up 22:12:58:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Failed to remove directory './work/00': boost::filesystem::remove: Directory not empty: "./work/00" 22:13:02:WU02:FS00:0xa7:Completed 8750 out of 125000 steps (7%) I keep getting the following error is this a permission issue and if so how can I allow FAH to delete these directory's?
Bleak
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited