Toskache

Members
  • Content Count

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3 Neutral

About Toskache

  • Rank
    Newbie

Converted

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Deutschland

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Indeed, it was not activated because I simply did not know... Thanks for the hint!
  2. It works with ":version-6.2.25" but not with ":latest" But I have to adopt all APs/USGs manually via CLI (set-inform http://IP.OF.CONTROLLER.DOCKER:8080/inform) again.
  3. Changeing the version from "latest" to "version 6.2.23" works, but then all my APs and my USG-3P failed to adopt. After setting the inform-url via ssh (set-inform http://IP.OF.CONTROLLER.DOCKER:8080/inform) it works again.
  4. Same issue here. "Patching" the data/db/version with a 6.1.71 works. But this is a very ugly workaround. Whats is the real solution here? 1. Workaround, backup clean install and then importing the backup? or 2. Waiting for a better solution? Happy fathers-day!
  5. Nice Tutorial, thank you! Unfortunately I have problems to setup fscrawler: The docker configuration: Starting the docker shows the following output in the docker-log: 16:46:01,584 [32mINFO [m [f.p.e.c.f.c.BootstrapChecks] Memory [Free/Total=Percent]: HEAP [226.5mb/3.4gb=6.38%], RAM [4.7gb/15.6gb=30.16%], Swap [0b/0b=0.0]. 16:46:01,611 [33mWARN [m [f.p.e.c.f.c.FsCrawlerCli] job [job_name] does not exist 16:46:01,611 [32mINFO [m [f.p.e.c.f.c.FsCrawlerCli] Do you want to create it (Y/N)? Exception in thread "main" java.util.NoSuchElementException at java.util.Scan
  6. I have a "SoNNeT G10E-1X-E3" (Chipset: Aquantia AQC-107S) and it's running fine. I got it for ~110 EUR (amazon)
  7. Update1: I can still see some RX drops, but the iperf3 performance is fine again now. I may play a little more with the RX buffers ... Update2: All Rx-drops are gone!! Setting the Rx-Buffer from 256k to 1024 did the trick.
  8. Finaly i got it: In the plugin "Tips and Tweaks" the setting of the "CPU Scaling Governor" was set to "Power Save". I don't know whether I set it that way or whether it came with the beta29. This was the reason for the drops. When I switch to "On Demand" or "Performance" everything is fine again. No RX drops. toskache@Hacky ~ % iperf3 -c 192.168.2.4 Connecting to host 192.168.2.4, port 5201 [ 5] local 192.168.2.26 port 50768 connected to 192.168.2.4 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 9.38 Gbits/sec [ 5] 1.00-2.
  9. With 6.9.0-beta30 i can observe a performance-issue with my "SoNNeT G10E-1X-E3" network card. It is based on the chipset "Aquantia AQC-107S". With 6.9.0-beta25 i got the following iperf3 results: toskache@10GPC ~ % iperf3 -c 192.168.2.4 Connecting to host 192.168.2.4, port 5201 [ 5] local 192.168.2.199 port 50204 connected to 192.168.2.4 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.15 GBytes 9.90 Gbits/sec [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.15 GBytes 9.89 Gbits/sec [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.15 GBytes 9.89 Gbits/sec [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.15 GBytes
  10. You are completely right! I Testet with various combinations of bs and count. The last one I copied in the thread realy not reasonable. With dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/cache/testfile.img bs=32K count=32000; sync I get 490 MB/s which is the ca. 90% of the double-performance of one single SATA-SSD. So the cache performance seems to be fine. For more performance i have to go with M.2/NVMe. The only problem now are the dropped RX packets. With 6.9.0-beta25 i did not see any droped rx-packets. I posted it in the beta-thread.
  11. With 6.9.0-beta30 i can observe a performance-issue with my "SoNNeT G10E-1X-E3" network card. It is based on the chipset "Aquantia AQC-107S". With 6.9.0-beta25 i got the following iperf3 results: toskache@10GPC ~ % iperf3 -c 192.168.2.4 Connecting to host 192.168.2.4, port 5201 [ 5] local 192.168.2.199 port 50204 connected to 192.168.2.4 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.15 GBytes 9.90 Gbits/sec [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.15 GBytes 9.89 Gbits/sec [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.15 GBytes 9.89 Gbits/sec [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.15 GBytes
  12. That is crystal clear, but my Router (Fritz!Box 6591 Cable) doesn‘t support jumbo frames MTU 1518 is the maximum. But the MTU-Size is not the reason for the drops!?
  13. Sorry for the late response. @JorgeB I performed a retest with iperf: unraid as iperf3-Server: toskache@Hacky ~ % iperf3 -c 192.168.2.4 Connecting to host 192.168.2.4, port 5201 [ 5] local 192.168.2.26 port 53229 connected to 192.168.2.4 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 519 MBytes 4.35 Gbits/sec [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 504 MBytes 4.22 Gbits/sec [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 491 MBytes 4.12 Gbits/sec [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 498 MBytes 4.17 Gbits/sec [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 499 MBytes 4.18 Gbits/sec [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec
  14. Ok, it was probably a mistake of mine. I was just surprised that files> 2G were never generated during the performance tests with "dd".