danielocdh

For anyone googling this, there is a solution

the new path for the image seems to be /mnt/user/system/libvirt/libvirt.img Thanks

I ended up using an ubuntu docker image with wine(to run clrmamepro), I had to map every disk to one folder in the docker (/mnt/disk1/emu, /mnt/disk2/emu, ... instead of single /mnt/user/emu) The downsides of this method I have seen so far are: - I'm getting warnings about some sets: "Set exists in various rompaths", probably could be fixed by manually moving files to the same disk - created/moved files are owned by root with permissions 644, I'm using chmod/chown on unraid terminal to fix this for now As for the speed, scanning seems normal(for multiple rom paths) but I'm guessing the writing/fixing could be slower because of parity I tried to use the same docker but with /mnt/user/emu mapped, it seemed like it didn't freeze but the speed was slower. I used the default options for clrmamepro except that I unchecked: Scanner->Advanced->Deeper check for fixable missing files, it might work with that option checked but it takes longer and I didn't need it.

So a while ago I moved my rom collections to unraid but now I'm trying to scan them to update them but clrmamepro just gets stuck on most files over and over, there is no network transfer or disk reading in unraid besides 100KiB or less every 5-15 seconds. the problem only comes up when scanning the files on unraid from any other computer. I tested scanning the files on computer1 from an unraid vm and it works, I tried scanning the files on computer1 from computer2 and it works, the speed isn't great but it works(1-10mb/s) and it finishes the scans. I already tried all optimizations that I could find for samba, I don't think any made a difference. I also tried uninstalling plugins. Is there any fix for this or something else I can try?

Are folder exclusions recursive? So for example if I exclude folder _abc, will that exclude /mnt/user/x/_abc/some_file.zip ? If not, how can I achieve this, thanks.

Prevent smb users from deleting .Recycle.Bin while allowing the plugin to still work(I assume I'll have to keep testing but seems to work so far). I was wondering/looking for confirmation about the plugin or unraid changing the permissions I set manually. I did some more testing with unraid changing the share security setting, export setting and users with access and it seems my manually set permissions weren't changed

I have been testing a bit and it seems that setting the .Recycle.Bin folder owner/group to root and permissions to 0700 blocks smb users from deleting/accessing it. This works great for me but I'm thinking unraid or even the plugin might change it at some point. Will unraid/the plugin respect the permissions I set for .Recycle.Bin?