MJFox

thank you for this great plugin! currently the process is: -) stop all the containers -) backup all the containers -) start all the containers I let the plugin create individual zip-files for each container wouldn't it be better to change the process like this in such a case: -) stop the first container -) backup the first container -) start the first container -) stop the second container -) backup the second container -) start the second container etc. this would greatly reduce the downtime for each container

did you ever find something? I'm getting tired of Fing and looking for a replacement as well

so what is the best alternative to mount a (share-)folder from the host into the VM if you want to avoid 9p? I tried to mount the share over SMB and over NFS and set an apache web root to the mounted folder and I got very weird problems like the files disappearing and re-appearing randomly, apache offering the files for download instead of serving them, apache didn't see the latest version of a file until I opened the file on the VM-console etc.

thank you very much for this great script, it works very well! 👍

thanks for your suggestion I just tried and tested my script and it works well in the background, I just changed "tail -F " to "tail -n 1 -F " so my script only checks the last line of the log-file give it a try Cheers MJFox

Hi! Great little plugin, thanks a lot. I have a question though: I want to start a script that runs in background after the disk array starts. This is the content of the script: #!/bin/bash tail -F "/mnt/cache/appdata/plex/Library/Application Support/Plex Media Server/Logs/Plex Media Server.log" | \ while read line ; do echo "$line" | grep "authenticated user" if [ $? = 0 ] then mdcmd spinup 0 mdcmd spinup 1 mdcmd spinup 2 sleep 30 fi done what it does is it spins up the disks whenever somebody opens plex obviously I want to keep the script running in the background when unraid boots up... is it ok to just start the script with the "At Startup of Array"- option? will it keep running in the background then? thanks MJFox