Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Unraid

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

drwatson

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by drwatson

  1. I am having a problem starting the NUT service for my UPS. I am not quite sure what I'm missing, but I've tried to follow other's advice and try different drivers other than usbhid-ups, but none seem to work. Can someone help me figure out what I need to change to get this working? I am running nut-2.8.0-x86_64-2stable.ssl11 on Unraid Version 6.11.5. I have a USB connected CyberPower UPS (cp1500 AVR LCD) only servicing the Unraid server (no master/slave required). When I scan for the ups driver, I get the following: [nutdev1] driver = "usbhid-ups" port = "auto" vendorid = "0764" productid = "0501" bus = "005" This jives with the USB Diagnostics output of: Bus 005 Device 003: ID 0764:0501 Cyber Power System, Inc. CP1500 AVR UPS When I try and start the service, the syslog indicates the following and NUT doesn't start: Jun 6 22:34:37 Ceti rc.nut: Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.47 (2.8.0) Jun 6 22:34:37 Ceti rc.nut: USB communication driver (libusb 1.0) 0.43 Jun 6 22:34:37 Ceti rc.nut: libusb1: Could not open any HID devices: insufficient permissions on everything Jun 6 22:34:37 Ceti rc.nut: No matching HID UPS found Jun 6 22:34:37 Ceti rc.nut: Driver failed to start (exit status=1) Jun 6 22:34:37 Ceti rc.nut: Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.8.0 Jun 6 22:34:45 Ceti ool www[2953]: /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/nut-dw/scripts/write_config Jun 6 22:34:45 Ceti rc.nut: Writing NUT configuration... Jun 6 22:34:48 Ceti rc.nut: Updating permissions for NUT... Jun 6 22:34:48 Ceti rc.nut: Checking if the NUT Runtime Statistics Module should be enabled... Jun 6 22:34:48 Ceti rc.nut: Disabling the NUT Runtime Statistics Module... Here is a screen cap of the settings in the UI:
  2. Hello all! I have worked through a lot of the stumbling blocks I've encountered so far, but I'm stumped on this one. I am trying to get transcoding to work on my Plex media server, but have not been able to get it to work. It always shows Direct Stream. I have unraid version 6.11.5. I have an Nvidia GTX 760 I have version 470.141.03 of the driver (through reading, I discovered that this unraid version and this driver are compatible) When looking in Settings > Nvidia Driver, I see it recognizes the correct card and gives me a GPU uuid. In my Plex container, I have set: NVIDIA_DRIVER_CAPABILITIES = all NVIDIA_VISIBLE_DEVICES = GPU GUID Nvidia Driver displays Extra Parameters = --runtime=nvidia I have Plex Pass I have check marks in "Use hardware acceleration when available" and "Use hardware-accelerated video when encoding" Hardware transcoding device dropdown set to Auto nvidia-smi shows that it sees the card, gets the card temperature and shows the right driver version. Question 1: In Plex transcoding configuration in the Hardware transcoding device dropdown, is it supposed to show my GPU there? If so, it's not there. Question 2: I have looked in a couple of locations to see if the GTX 760 is capable of transcoding. Some show yes and other show no. Does anyone have success in Plex with this card? Question 3: When it shows Direct Stream, does that mean it doesn't think it needs to transcode? I test using a video that is 4K (HEVC Main) showing in a web browser as the Plex client. Shouldn't this trigger transcoding?
  3. Yes, that disk is still being emulated. Unraid detected a full drive failure so it automatically flipped into emulation mode. I went to look at the drive and I couldn't get any SMART information at all. That drive is dead. It doesn't look like there are any files on it though. When I browse to it in the Unraid UI (far right button) it says 0 objects: 0 directories, 0 files (0 B total). So I think technically, I could remove that disk all together and I wouldn't mind. It was only 2TB.
  4. Looking through the log, I see the most recent 4 errors. They all look like this: Error 137 [0] occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 10328 hours (430 days + 8 hours) When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle. After command completion occurred, registers were: ER -- ST COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC -- -- -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- -- 40 -- 41 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Error: UNC at LBA = 0x00000000 = 0 Commands leading to the command that caused the error were: CR FEATR COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name -- == -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- -- --------------- -------------------- 60 04 00 00 a8 00 02 9b be 2c 28 40 00 1d+07:49:43.717 READ FPDMA QUEUED 2f 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 1d+07:49:43.717 READ LOG EXT 61 04 00 00 a0 00 02 9b be 30 28 40 00 1d+07:49:30.714 WRITE FPDMA QUEUED 60 00 30 00 d0 00 02 9b bc 3a e0 40 00 1d+07:49:24.272 READ FPDMA QUEUED 60 00 08 00 b8 00 02 9b bc 3a d8 40 00 1d+07:49:24.271 READ FPDMA QUEUED These are the two lines that seem concerning. Everything else looks ok. 0x03 0x028 4 100435 --- Read Recovery Attempts 0x04 0x008 4 137 --- Number of Reported Uncorrectable Errors So obviously there have been some errors. I just don't know where the tipping point is for replacing the drive. What would you do? Would these errors be enough to warranty-replace the drive?
  5. ceti-smart-20220107-1050.zip Thanks for all your help. Here's the report.
  6. SMART extended self-test finished and completed without errors. Is the SMART test result something that can be relied on? Does this mean the disk is fine?
  7. Ok, I'm letting it run now and it's up to 50%. I'll see what the results are for that once it's done and post here. I'd say another 5 hours until it's done.
  8. I have stopped the SMART extended self-test, set spin down to Never and then restarted the extended self-test. It jump straight to 10% and then stops. Been there for about 40 minutes so I stopped the test. Then I ran the short test with the spin down still set to never and that completed with "Completed without error". I have another identical drive to this one in the server. I started a SMART extended self-test on that one and it too sat at 10% complete for about 45 minutes. I then turned the spin down on that drive to Never and started the SMART extended self-test again. It too sits at 10% and doesn't move on after 40 mins of waiting. Not sure what to do here. I'm leaning toward replacing the drive and then doing a pre-clear on it and see what happens. Thoughts?
  9. That's great news! Can you explain why there are 5916 errors listed for that drive on the main dashboard? What do these error messages mean then if there isn't a problem? Jan 6 00:51:27 Ceti kernel: blk_update_request: critical medium error, dev sdc, sector 11202867192 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 6 prio class 0 I am running a SMART extended self-test, but seems to be sitting at 10% for a long time (like 15 minutes). Is that normal?
  10. Sorry about that. I thought I attached them. Guess not. ceti-diagnostics-20220106-0816.zip
  11. I have a failed data drive that is in emulation mode. I went out and purchased a larger (and equal in size as parity) drive to replace it. I was doing a preclear on the new drive and I started noticing errors on my parity drive. (I only run a single parity drive.) Here are the diagnostics on it: The log for the disk repeats these lines: Jan 5 22:02:16 Ceti kernel: blk_update_request: critical medium error, dev sdc, sector 11083279656 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 66 prio class 0 Jan 5 22:02:40 Ceti kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdc] tag#7962 UNKNOWN(0x2003) Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08 cmd_age=6s Jan 5 22:02:40 Ceti kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdc] tag#7962 Sense Key : 0x3 [current] [descriptor] Jan 5 22:02:40 Ceti kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdc] tag#7962 ASC=0x11 ASCQ=0x0 Jan 5 22:02:40 Ceti kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdc] tag#7962 CDB: opcode=0x88 88 00 00 00 00 02 94 9d c7 e0 00 00 04 00 00 00 Jan 5 22:02:40 Ceti kernel: blk_update_request: critical medium error, dev sdc, sector 11083303424 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 60 prio class 0 Jan 5 22:35:38 Ceti kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdc] tag#8485 UNKNOWN(0x2003) Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08 cmd_age=6s Jan 5 22:35:38 Ceti kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdc] tag#8485 Sense Key : 0x3 [current] [descriptor] Jan 5 22:35:38 Ceti kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdc] tag#8485 ASC=0x11 ASCQ=0x0 Jan 5 22:35:38 Ceti kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sdc] tag#8485 CDB: opcode=0x88 88 00 00 00 00 02 8f da ee 90 00 00 04 00 00 00 Jan 5 22:35:38 Ceti kernel: blk_update_request: critical medium error, dev sdc, sector 11003425248 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 22 prio class 0 I've done a bunch of looking around and have gathered information but I just want confirmation that I have the right answers. My questions are these: 1) Does this parity drive look like it needs replacing? (I think yes) 2) When replacing a parity drive, is a pre-clear necessary? (I think no. I think preclear is recommended to replace data drives.) Is it bad to do it? (I don't think so.) 3) Is it ok to do a parity-swap procedure with a drive that is reporting read errors like this? (I think yes.) If not, what's the alternative? (I don't have any idea.) 4) Maybe a dumb question, but the errors started on the parity drive when I removed the bad data disk from the array. I don't suppose having a bad data disk could make the parity read go bad, could it? I don't think so, but I thought I'd ask anyway.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.