michael123

you're right, I do not need accounts, but 'root' account does not work anymore with V5 (does it?) can I remove the accounts except for 'root', run 'newpermissions' again, ..and which user/pass shall I use to access the SMB shares?

I see in /etc/samba/smb-names.conf the following line map to guest = Bad User and also in /etc/samba/smb.conf there is invalid users = root

thanks indeed, it bothers me.. however, since the drive is already installed and has some data, is it possible to upgrade it? I assume I need to buy some USB cable?

Hi this seems to be consistent. When running the new permissions, it display the progress on the same window below. when I close the window, however, it does two things - I do not see anymore the 'new permissions' and children in 'ps' list - the web interface is gone.. 1) I assume it is a bug.. 2) how can I restart the web gui without restarting the server?

ok, thanks

I just verified that if I create the file from the machine that (above) could not read - the other can now.. (e.g. the opposite way it works) E.g. if the file is created with 'nobody' uid, it will be fine. I just don't understand why is it 'nobody' in one case, and 'michaeln' in another..

It is Seagate Barracuda ST3000DM001

First, at which side is the problem? Machine that created the file? Machines that are accessing? Is it normal that the ownership is 'michaeln' for new files? Is it normal the I can access the directory only when the uid is changed to 'nobody'? Why the accessing machines were authenticated as 'nobody' but 'readonly' access? is it kind of guest? I did not see any guest account..

I added 3TB drive (and that was a trigger to upgrade from 4.7) The led is green all the time. How can I troubleshoot this? Is there any disk activity? If not - what might be the reason?

I was **not** logged as root, but rather 'michaeln' On the other computer, I was trying to access, though, I am not sure at all which user the system was using. But then I logged in via Putty and with smbstatus I saw that these sessions receiving 'access denied' are using uid=99, which is 'nobody' I do not understand what's happening. All my shares are declared as 'public' and I understand that the ACL are not applied in this case...

Since I was not able to playback music.. I ran again NewPermissions (although it was planned to run once, isn't it?) It fixes the issue by changing the owner from 'michaeln' to 'nobody'.. I assume next time I copy files to unRaid server they will acquire ownership of 'michaeln' and I will have the same issue.. What am I doing wrong?

Hi I upgraded 4.7 to most recent 5.0 (rc6-test2) Then I ran 'NewPermissions' I also created two new users, in addition to 'root' Old files - that were created on 4.7 - work However, the files I copied after the upgrade - do not. The difference is that their owner is one of the (new) users I created above. I can only access these new files using the new user. The other problem with Windows is, however, that it somehow authenticates with cached (?) account, unRaid for some reason allows log-in, but do not allow the access to the new files.. thank you guys, this is already 2nd day into this upgrade and my family has no video neither audio :-(

Hi is there a simple way to find any deleted files and restore selectively (in V5)? -- Michael

Thanks!

I have the s3_sleep script (forgot its correct name), I think I have also directory caching script.. I do not run any kind of torrent, http, etc. I am worried about hardware, drivers, .. and mostly - data loss.. I have WD and Seagate 2TB and 1.5TB drives,

It is a "production" system. I would expect from Lime to certify their own hardware..

4.7

Hello Are there any compatibility issues with MD-1510/LL http://lime-technology.com/products/md-1510-server/65 ?? thanks,

Hello did anyone made some - stress test, with mixed write/read scenarios? I expierence lockups for up to a minute (!) in 4.7 even with 2-3 threads.. Is it better in 5.0? - what are raw performance improvements (e.g. requests/sec, MB/sec read/write, ..)? thanks