-
-
Fix Common Problems: Your server has detected hardware errors.
Hi all, FCP said to post diagnostics here. There wasn't any other info other than that. All help appreciated. Cheers, Roy nexus-diagnostics-20251217-2105.zip
-
[Support] binhex - General
Hi all, I'm using the delugeVPN container and successfully routing my arr's via it. But it got me wondering. With Tailscale now baked into unraid, is there a way to configure the VPN in this container as my exit node? Just a thought... Roy
-
Corneloues started following VM Templates
-
Corneloues started following Unraid 6.11.1 - virtiofs with Windows 10 VM , Machine Check Events detected on your server , SMB Shares not showing since adding a new NIC and 1 other
-
Machine Check Events detected on your server
The Fix Common Problems plugin has reported this error and suggested uploading my diagnostics. So this is what I've done. Any help would be greatly received. Cheers, Roy nexus-diagnostics-20250820-1921.zip
-
SMB Shares not showing since adding a new NIC
The server was appearing, but not the shares! I think the witchcraft includes reading these forums, because without change, they all started to appear again! Cheers, Roy
-
SMB Shares not showing since adding a new NIC
Low and behold - they've now started working!
-
SMB Shares not showing since adding a new NIC
@Frank1940 done... Thanks
-
SMB Shares not showing since adding a new NIC
I've recently migrated my unraid drives to new hardware - an HP Z820 to be exact. This has two onboard ethernet ports. I decided to add a 3rd as I also have two Q509 NAS which have two ports each: 1 connected to the LAN, the other direct to the Z820. Shares between the Q509's and the Z820 are working fine, but the unraid shares are no longer visible on the LAN. For reference: eth0 - new single NIC connected to LAN eth1 & 2 - Q509's The SMB config is as follows: Enabled: Yes Hide "dot" files: No Enable SMB Multichannel: Yes enhancedMac: No NETBIOS: yes WSD: Yes I have the following in my SMB Extra Config [global] server multi channel support = yes bind interfaces only = yes interfaces = eth0 eth1 eth2 // I've tried br0 instead of eth0 min protocol = SMB2 max protocol = SMB3 I'm guessing the server multi channel support = yesin the extras shouldn't really be there. The server can see the LAN and access the internet. While were at it. I only want internet traffic going in/out over eth0, not via the NAS (eth1 & 2) Any help would be appreciated. TIA, Roy tower-diagnostics-20250724-1243.zip
-
Remote Access
Hey @JorgeB , that didn't change anything, still get the same routes listed. This is what has presented on Terminal when the restart had finished. Cheers, Roy
-
Remote Access
Hi all, I've had a quick scan of this forum, but appears to show up for my issue. I was having problems with remote access, but then fond out my provider was using CGNAT, so I upgraded to a static IP. I now see a UPnP rule on my router for Unraid Connect. However, that new route never appears in my list of routes. To add to that, the IP address shown here, is not actually my server address. But the eth0 interface in Network Settings does have the right IP. The IP address above IS a previous address for the server, which changed after running some dedicated ethernet and moving the server to another room. The UPnP rule does have the right IP address. Is there something I can change, or would I be better off uninstalling and re-installing the UC plugin? Cheers, Roy
-
Unraid 6.11.1 - virtiofs with Windows 10 VM
Just set up my first Windows VM using VirtIO-FS I only appear to be able to access one share at a time. I can access any share I like as long as it's only 1! I changed to order, deleted, re-added, but it appears whatever the last share in the VM config, is the one that the VM sees. I've checked in Device Manager, and I'm seeing a VirtIO FS system device for each share I've added. I've tried uninstalling, re-installing. Adding/removing shares, but no joy. And I have added the dependency for VirtioFsSvc to WinFSP.Launcher, as per SpaceInvaderOne's video. Am I missing something?
-
[Support] binhex - DelugeVPN
Ah bugger... My skills don't stretch that far yet... Maybe easier to use a different VPN client.
-
[Support] binhex - DelugeVPN
Run a Soulseek client over the VPN
-
[Support] binhex - DelugeVPN
Yes, and this is what I have configured. But one of my containers needs a port open to the outside world. So I'm trying to use a PIA port to do that. Can that be done?
-
[Support] binhex - DelugeVPN
So got DelugeVPN back up and running. I'm looking to route other containers through this one, but confused by the definitions of VPN_INPUT_PORTS and VPN_OUTPUT_PORTS... The container I want to pass through, requires an external port opened. If I connect to PIA on the desktop to Berlin, I get a port back consistently, so assume this would be the same port I get when connecting via delugevpn. I am adding the necessary port to VPN_OUTPUT_PORTS. I've tried testing to see if the port is open as per the PIA FAQ's: nc -l {PORT} http://{VPN IP}:{PORT} But I don't get the expected output back. I haven't routed the container yet, just looking to make sure I have a port and it's open. Am I missing something?
-
[Support] binhex - DelugeVPN
Corneloues
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited