Tomo82
Members-
Posts
25 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Tomo82's Achievements
-
I hope it's not too off-topic, it's kind of related to licensing: When can we get rid of USB Key requirement!?!?!?! I hate it, it's the weakest, most annoying part of Unraid for me.
-
Thanks for trying to help @Vr2Io 👍
-
Fixed: I stopped array, went to Network Settings and changed the vlans, applied, then changed them back - now it works. No changes to VMs or switches etc. Unraid networking seems so flakey to me, dissapointed.
-
Hi Vr2lo, Thanks for your reply, I remember the VLAN numbers go above 4000 (it's been some years since I did my CCNA course yikes) - I will try a lower number VLAN later (I can't shut down pfsense to change Unraid network settings at the moment). I made a diagram of the setup I am using, please see attached.
-
Tomo82 started following Networking weirdness - ETH0 is there but no NIC and 2 VMs on Unraid with same VLAN - no comms
-
Hi All, Hope someone can help... (I searched both the Legacy and new Docs and there was not a single entry for VLAN ☹️) I have a pfsense VM and a Windows 10 VM, both on same Unraid host, sharing same VLAN 4000. Pfsense is set to use br0 (with VLAN4000 configured to use LAN) and the Win10 has br0.4000. I have tried assigning both VM dedicated interfaces in Unraid and making sure they are both on the same bridge - but Win10 still refuses to grab a valid IP. And also Win10 on br0 and setting vlan inside - nothing is ever received. I am fairly sure it's not a pfsense config issue, as I have a Unifi docker with a Guest Wifi VLAN, and clients are pulling DHCP and internet through the VLAN 100 from pfsense with no problems. Also in a packet capture I see the unraid docker bridge talking the pfsense VLAN 4000 interface IP. In the Unraid network settings I have just the VLAN 4000 configured...should I remove it? But then I lose the ability to give the win10 VM a VLAN nic directly. Any help appreciated 🙂 ungb-diagnostics-20230907-1746.zip
-
Allow changing SMB settings without stopping array
Tomo82 replied to chimlm's topic in Feature Requests
Old thread - but still relevant! This is totally stupid - @JorgeB (et all) Why is this the case? To have to stop all VMs and Dockers just to change a share is riduculous. -
Thanks Jorge, deleting network-rules.cfg fixed the weird behaviour.
-
Hi All, I've got a weird issue that I can't resolve, hope someone can point me in the right direction. TL;DR: My networking is messed up - how do I reset it? I tried deleting the network.cfg - but ETH0 remains (with no NIC) and is messed up. What I would like: Just use the add-in card ports for Unraid, VMs, Docker etc. Unraid Version: 6.12.3 History: I have an onboard NIC and a dual port PCIe add in card. I added a PCIe VDSL modem card that I wanted to passthrough to a VM. Networking settings said that there were ETH0,1,2,3. MACs were messed up but number of NICs was correct. I had problems with passing through this card, so I removed it and also disabled the onboard NIC, but ETH0 remains and doesn't seem refer to a physical NIC. I would just like ETH0 & ETH1 to refer to the physical ports on the add in NIC card. Thanks for any help 🙂 ungb-diagnostics-20230824-2012.zip
-
Hi All, I am having some trouble acheiving my desired network config. Problems I have right now: No internet Connection for Trial Key to start Array Static IPv4 assigned to Br1 (Bond of eth1 & 2), appears to come from MAC address on eth0 I would like to achieve this: Onboard NIC > Unraid WebGUI Only Static IPv4 Dual port NIC > LACP Bond0 > Br1 & Br1.4000 VLAN Br1: static IPv4 with default bridge for Docker Containers & VMs Br1.4000: static IPv4 bridge for apps that should use a VPN At the moment I am on a Trial Key and the webgui says there is no internet connection - I think it has something to do with me changing the Default GW metric on Bond0. I am not sure how to change the default docker interface for the bridge. Is that possible? This is what I have so far (and I also attached the diagnostics): ungb-diagnostics-20230419-1737.zip
-
Server doesn't boot witha new HP NC523SFP Dual Port 10GbE
Tomo82 replied to bobo89's topic in General Support
Hmm ok, does that new HP card work in another computer? Try BIOS update? Any logs on the Unraid side? -
Server doesn't boot witha new HP NC523SFP Dual Port 10GbE
Tomo82 replied to bobo89's topic in General Support
What motherboard do you have? Is there a BIOS Update for it? What was the old NIC that worked? Any other NICs working? -
@JorgeB Thanks for the info, on that note; I have a quick question - Is it better to roll back to the latest stable release and use the ZFS Plugin(s)? Would I have any problems importing/mounting a 2x4 wide RAIDZ1 pool with metadata and log special vdevs with some of the datasets encrypted?
-
That worked, thank you. But now I am questioning my sanity - could the upgrade to RC3 do that or is the only way this can happen through a user action(s) and I litterally forgot I did it?!
-
I just double checked and the gui will not let me start the array without entering a passphrase.
-
Hi Jorge, this is the output: root@UNGB:~# blkid /dev/sda1: LABEL_FATBOOT="UNRAID" LABEL="UNRAID" UUID="272C-EBE2" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="vfat" /dev/loop1: TYPE="squashfs" /dev/sdf2: LABEL="Data" UUID="4425326131143143847" UUID_SUB="4653481705694029441" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="0d701f1c-0ceb-43a3-80ae-3e233f4f960c" /dev/nvme0n1p1: LABEL="Data" UUID="4425326131143143847" UUID_SUB="7980830101821951246" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="c4023445-40d6-4e80-bda6-490ed40292ce" /dev/sdd2: LABEL="Data" UUID="4425326131143143847" UUID_SUB="4014620395716939300" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="d0c86c4f-5222-415d-9d93-ea8f8aa48fee" /dev/sdb2: LABEL="Data" UUID="4425326131143143847" UUID_SUB="16148661145758674678" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="6e6dfbe8-3bec-48f3-ad4e-18631cd80eb0" /dev/sdi2: LABEL="Data" UUID="4425326131143143847" UUID_SUB="2371367520519899344" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="d1273b47-cf72-41c2-a638-2f53226e4177" /dev/nvme2n1p1: LABEL="Data" UUID="4425326131143143847" UUID_SUB="11107764850259308245" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="96d66c53-3314-4ea7-bbae-34f5a5375a6f" /dev/sdg2: LABEL="Data" UUID="4425326131143143847" UUID_SUB="2181119398401058338" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="1787b7cb-f97a-4867-92d4-7d2ee1870031" /dev/loop0: TYPE="squashfs" /dev/sde2: LABEL="Data" UUID="4425326131143143847" UUID_SUB="2653561897780408385" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="c06d4061-3a52-4521-9748-812482e60b7c" /dev/sdc2: LABEL="Data" UUID="4425326131143143847" UUID_SUB="11490087289074098495" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="da8b6e6b-1bd6-43a8-a211-4bc2baabcbf5" /dev/nvme1n1p1: LABEL="disk1" UUID="677435318427908930" UUID_SUB="2878345105989975532" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="518dd946-cec7-47bb-b3fd-a8903cd7b5a4" /dev/sdh2: LABEL="Data" UUID="4425326131143143847" UUID_SUB="1008136221314140058" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="16a8b497-07ff-4a53-9055-e7a919e30829" /dev/md1p1: LABEL="disk1" UUID="677435318427908930" UUID_SUB="2878345105989975532" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" /dev/sdf1: PARTUUID="f14197b3-e7b4-4d56-a1de-0f1b368c2404" /dev/sdd1: PARTUUID="62a7f470-dcd7-475e-aa56-7e51d2e81453" /dev/sdb1: PARTUUID="fa190476-92a9-4a22-86f7-8738009f6050" /dev/sdi1: PARTUUID="dd1f69c3-30b0-464b-9899-a559daf04563" /dev/sdg1: PARTUUID="ad0d9f54-d177-4019-b9ba-21eaaf726993" /dev/sde1: PARTUUID="51279591-c29a-4ac8-abda-cb87130f5737" /dev/sdc1: PARTUUID="fa7d96b1-490b-42b2-9f79-d560ab009532" /dev/sdh1: PARTUUID="49237ae0-dd30-468d-b3d3-ee0f46853926" I have had to insert the passphrase for this drive many times, I have not removed the encryption so it should be still on it...