NAS

Moderators
  • Content Count

    5008
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

NAS last won the day on December 18 2020

NAS had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

55 Good

About NAS

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Converted

  • Gender
    Undisclosed

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Suggestion for Update Assistant part of Fix Common Problems. Check all users for any instances of screen running.
  2. This clearly falls within the bounds of the release methodology. I appreciate the conflicting pressures and associated costs but its time, 332 days between security releases is pushing it a bit.
  3. I was indeed agreeing. Just for clarity the normal security reporting methodology is to start with private contact. Normally this is for unpublished vulnerabilities but it holds equally true for published ones where the vendor may just not have noticed or has noticed and something has went wrong and they wrongly assume fixes are in place. It is VERY common for vendors to patch, release but not pen test the actual release after. After a reasonable period of time if unresolved you can and should then post publicly so that users who are vulnerable have the maximum chance t
  4. Do not open 445 to the internet.
  5. It is important that users who choose a non subscription model, even if that is just implicit by the fact they use only the traditional unRAID product, that there be no phone home or other services that reach out of the system by lieu of the subscription services running in "off" mode of or any other mechanism. I cannot stress this enough. Feel free to add value in whatever way suits your business but dont break that trust model whilst doing so.
  6. Whilst it is not ideal that the poster did not follow normal security reporting etiquette it is clear there is an issue and it is off our own making. See versus http://www.slackware.com/security/list.php?l=slackware-security&y=2020 tl;dr we are long overdue an update but we have slipped into the old habit of waiting for the development branch to be ready and ignoring the stable branch. It is not the end of the world but its a habit we need to break again ASAP
  7. @unRate can you post a few representative examples to set context. Nothing should be `fixed over a year ago` but 280-290 days is unfortunately possible.
  8. This is a very interesting poll and I commend the people responsible. I do however question why `SSD Array option with Trim support` is on this poll though. The other items in the poll are feature enhancements, nice to haves or power user edge cases..... but supporting SSDs in 2020 should be a basic capability for a NAS not something we poll to see if its optionally wanted.
  9. NAS

    Better Defaults

    This is a pretty big deal if it is true. I wouldnt know how to pull this off right now though so more details required.
  10. I think I can actually replicate this now. If i mount a USB drive and copy files continuously to my SSD cache drive which also is the location of my docker loopback image then after a few minutes docker starts to not respond which obviously ruins the web GUI as well. I routinely copied files in this way in all previous versions and the cache drive seems fine (its pretty new) and there are no errors in any log that I can see. The SSD is attached to a motherboard SATA port directly. I am pretty sure it is IO WAIT as load sky rockets. Will wait and
  11. Except if you a company or any public body or a registered non profit or anyone with liability cover or any organization that has to comply is ISO accreditation or worldwide equivs or has independent audits or anyone covered by EU GDPR or or.... context is import and whilst most people here are home users plenty unRAID users are not Nice addon. I really mean that. It absolutely has its place but the default advice should always be "be secure unless you really really understand the risks of not being".
  12. yeah i dont think it is there either but i suspect this thread will hang about for years and hit first page on google since its so niche. (anyone else find themselves answering their own question via google in old forum posts... i do more than I care to admit)
  13. I faced an odd issue where the web gui would load but not completely. Specifically the dash wouldnt load but disk view would excluding the action buttons at the bottom. Docker view wouldnt load at all but settings would. Dockers containers did not work or were super slow (hard to say) Manually restarting one container instantly kicked web gui and docker into a working state. I cant replicate.
  14. @limetech can you confirm if this is indeed in `proc` just so I can close this thread down as solved and anyone else that happens upon it knows the definitive answer.
  15. hehe Out of curiusoty i never did find a way to do this by query /proc. Any idea if this data is in there somewhere?