NoRaid99

okay, trial and error brought me a bit further. "manual: no auto split" does not what I want, even when I create the top level folder on all the drives. (the structure: share"movie "/folder "movie1"/any subfolders .. and I would like that the folder "movie1" does not get splitted at all.) "auto split only top one level folder" didn't work as well, so I did go with the next possibility, the "auto split only two top level folders" and it started to fill up the secound disk. so as résumé at the first go I would have setted the "auto split top tree level folders" because there was one more folder in the structure befor the actual movie. but I still didn't get what is what level. could someone eplain to me how is the hirarchy... first level is what? (sorry to ask that stupid question, but I don't get it) got even more questions: what will be the level to choose if I want all my movies like "movie1" til "movie255" being stored all over my disks of the share in its unique folder and nothing splitted? maybe it was best, letting me figure it out my self... now I got the cause making me missunderstanding anything from before. that what I want is "manual: no automatic split" and finally it is working. only had to create the main share directory on every disk of the share. my problem was FreeFileSync. this tool did create all the folders as its first action, before copying the datas in them. so all the folders where created on disk one and just got filled up. thats why unraids "high water" could not work. now I was copying trough the file browser and the folders where copied one by one and it works as it should. thanks a lot to the victims. :)

I think the thing is with "automatically split any directory" that I will loose the control of my datas. Actually I dont want any splitting. Slowly I start to understand, hopefully . If I get this done: first I could not create the first level folder, but now I have seen that I have to tick "type" to be able to. I'll try it with "manual split". I'll try. edit: got split level now setted to manually. had to create the folders with mc and changed the owner to nobody. now there is all the space of the 6 drives with 43TB listed in the share. started to fill up the share and will see if it is working now.

okay, sorry. the path of the share is "user/movies_a-z/movies_a-z/..." the name of the share is movies_a-z with a subfolder with the same name. don't really remember why I started with folder the same as the share folder. I think it was because of syncing with freefilesync. but thats allready a long time ago since I had to do it like this. anyways, if I change to "user/movies_a-z/..." and wanting all disks included of the share, what split level I have to choose to not split the folder of a specific movie? I still don't understand why it was not working at first try.

Perhaps I dont understand that spliting feature. If I choose "manual: no automatic splitting" then my share shows only 8TB of space with disk1 only. If I choos automatic split level I get all selected disks and space. edit: could it be because FreeFileSync creates first all the directorys before copying the files? edit2: with setting "split any directory as required" it works. so what split level would I need to set as minimum to make it work with my filesystem?

thanks for reply, just edited my post. path example: user/movies_a-z/movies_a-z/movie1/1.mkv

Hello, hope somebody can point me in the right direction. I'm having problems with the "data-fillup" to my disks. There is one huge share with 6 8TB disks with a total of 43TB, high water and automatically split level only top two directorys. Now first disk 8TB is filled up with more then half (4.3TB) of its space and the datas are copied still to this first disk. (min. free disk space is set to 50GB) I do coppy with freefilesync running in a docker from one unraid server to the other as a backup server. folder structure: share-->movies a-z, then main folder movies a-z, and then every movie in a subfolder (user/movies_a-z/movies_a-z/movie1/1.mkv) But something I must do wrong, because array does not switch to fill up the secound drive. Could it be wrong when I setted disk minimum free space manually to 50GB? Additional infos: First I configured the split level to "top only" and when I realised that this might be wrong with my folder structure I did select "top two" and restarted the server. My parity drive has 10TB and all array disks have 8TB

Thanks a lot for this information. Perhaps it would be a good idea to add this to the tpm licensing faq. Moving the license by moving the tpm module should not work, like I learned from spaceinvaders video. He says that the license is not on the module it self, the modul is only for identification.

Don't know if this is the right place to ask, but I'll try. It's about the TPM license feature. Does fTPM on AMD processors work as well or do we have to get a TPM module then? And if I have to get a dedicated TPM 2.0 module, could this be taken over from MB to MB and the license will be kept/transfered?

I'm looking forward to go with the new internal boot and TPM licensing functionality in comming 7.3.x releases and forget about the quality-pen-drive desaster. imho it's time to change.

I have a question about the process of replacement of the boot device. Just swapped from the Samsung Bar Plus to the JetFlash600 and this worked without any problems so far. In the swap process I got told that the Samsung drive will be blacklisted. Is this drive blacklisted now only for this specific server (license) or in general?

Okay, thanks for this information. But I do not wonder about the performance of the Cruzer, isn't it one of the cheapest, branded pen drives at the market.

These nasty errors can drive you nuts. Everybody working some time on hardware has his own, similar experiences making themselves wonder. Reading the last posts made me check one of the pen drives that is a 64GB Samsung Bar Plus with UnraidOS. Manual temp-check didn't look bad. Pen drive was only a bit more then ambient, but definitely not hot at all. Perhaps there are many hardware versions with completely different contollers and nand chips. The max. power draw is 300mA for the Samsung Bar Plus USB3.1. imho that looks okay, especially in combination with the huge metal case. For comparison, the Transcend Jetflash takes max. 200mA at USB 2.0 and is bedded inside a all plastic case. @landS is there a noticeable difference in boot time between the Samsung Bar Plus 3.1 and the SanDisk Cruzer Blade 2.0?

thanks a lot for your help.

when I'm not logged in not. and I don't like to loggin only to check something etc. I think this is a basic and important feature what every homepage needs to have without search for it or logging in before. as an example please check https://9to5linux.com/ . this doesn't hurt anybody and all are happy. only to remind. there are people having big problems with there eyes looking onto a black desktop with red/orange fonts. it's okay for me if others prefer black themes, but please don't make it more complicated.

would it be possible to add a toggle for light theme on https://product.unraid.net/ please.

@Kilrah it's working again, thanks for fixing the template.

Hi, thanks a lot for helping. removing the "-u 99:100" I was trying allready, and as well privileged mode, but it did make no difference. my handycap is that I don't know enought about docker. Somehow it is not very transparent for me to find the changes they make. I will try from time to time and maybe it will work again one day.

I did try to install the older v1.8.3 today, and it ends up with the same permission error. didn't update anything on the unraid system, only updated docker containers. anybody a idea how to find the cause what did break and how to repair? PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/home/libretranslate/.config' mkdir: cannot create directory ‘/app/db/prometheus’: Permission denied usage: gunicorn [OPTIONS] [APP_MODULE] gunicorn: error: argument -w/--workers: expected one argument edit: I wonder if the unraid tool "Docker Safe New Perms" could solve this, but I'm scared to break more than what is now.

since last update libretranslate is not starting any more. PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/home/libretranslate/.config' allready tried to delete and reinstall, run as privileged. doesn't help. @ Kilrah do you have any idea what has changed now? seems to be a bit chaotic.

I was lucky and found the Transcend Jetflash600 (MLC). Controller: Alcor 0xF700 Possible Memory Chip(s): Micron MT29F256G08CEECB *2 Micron MT29F256G08CECCB *2 Memory Type: MLC Flash ID: yes Flash CE: 4 Flash Channels: Single Chip F/W: 950E Group: 98 VID: 8564 PID: 1000 Manufacturer: JetFlash Product: Mass Storage Device Query Vendor ID: JetFlash Query Product ID: Transcend 64GB Query Product Revision: 8.07 Physical Disk Capacity: 61160292352 Bytes Windows Disk Capacity: 61126770688 Bytes Internal Tags: AZWR-SG24 File System: FAT32 Relative Offset: 128 KB USB Version: 2.00 Declared Power: 200 mA ContMeas ID: Microsoft Windows 10 x64 Build 19045 ------------------------------------ http://www.antspec.com/usbflashinfo/ Program Version: 9.4.0.645

imho it is a nice solution with a DOM, never was thinking about. Do you mabe found a pinout of the header to make a diy cable? I wonder if both USB2 connections are used for the DOM. @PoMpIs didn't know before, that this is working... good to know. The weak point of this solution might be the USB to m2 converter from the case, not the SSD. Backup is not a point, because this is realy easy on any device. The price of a good enclosure might be a k.o. kriteria.

LLM is a huge difference, I agree. what and how are you running it? Another thing, yesterday I did create the libretranslate docker new and today unraid offers me a update. but there is no new releases. exactly this happend before and did break the container. do you have a glue whats about that updating error? notification mail: Event: Docker - libretranslate [b3da..e57a] Subject: Notice [QNAP] - Version update b3da..e57a Description: A new version of libretranslate is available Importance: normal edit: did let the update run and the container is still okay. I wonder if the update info shows up tomorrow again.

It is slowly getting better, depends on the languages too. For a enduser- free, self hosted docker container that does respect privacy, I think this is what we can get at the moment. I'm fine with it and pleased, that this exists. don't compare with the real big - ***** - only commercial solutions, respecting nothing and nobody.

@Kilrah thanks a lot for this modification. must be much better now. will these language models stored in appdata be updatet in future automatically by the libretranslate application?

Libretranslate Docker container does not work anymore since update to v1.8.3. Before there where problems when choosing languages and now it completely stucks at boot: ░█░░░▀█▀░█▀▄░█▀▄░█▀▀░▀█▀░█▀▄░█▀█░█▀█░█▀▀░█░░░█▀█░▀█▀░█▀▀ ░█░░░░█░░█▀▄░█▀▄░█▀▀░░█░░█▀▄░█▀█░█░█░▀▀█░█░░░█▀█░░█░░█▀▀ ░▀▀▀░▀▀▀░▀▀░░▀░▀░▀▀▀░░▀░░▀░▀░▀░▀░▀░▀░▀▀▀░▀▀▀░▀░▀░░▀░░▀▀▀ v1.8.3 Booting... any hints what I could do? how can I run a older/specific release? additionally I have to say that it was working before with v1.8.3. but the last days there was a update information in unraid and after updating it got broken. the strange thing is, that v1.8.3 is allready the latest release. edit: after deleting the container with removing the img, restart unraid server and reinstall libretranslate, it is working again. this seems a bit strange. hope it does not show-up a update again, as long there is none, and breaks the container again.