Jump to content

lovingHDTV

Members
  • Content Count

    498
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About lovingHDTV

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Converted

  • Gender
    Undisclosed

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I have two subnets that I would like access to. My LAN subnet 192.168.1.0 and AUG subnet 10.10.1.0. Unraid is on the LAN and I can access this fine, however I cannot access the AUG subnet via wireguard. I can access it fine when I'm on my LAN. Can this be done? For clarification: I can ping 10.10.1.116 from the Unraid box, but I cannot get access to it via WG. thanks david
  2. Played a bit more. It doesn't have anything to do with br0.10 as it doesn't work for br0 either. david
  3. In case this helps. some additional routing information for nzbgetvpn. sh-5.0# ifconfig eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.10.52 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.10.255 ether 02:42:c0:a8:0a:34 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet) RX packets 2744 bytes 689060 (672.9 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 1374 bytes 799401 (780.6 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback) RX packets 35 bytes 148888 (145.3 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 35 bytes 148888 (145.3 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 tun0: flags=4305<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 172.21.90.31 netmask 255.255.254.0 destination 172.21.90.31 unspec 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 txqueuelen 100 (UNSPEC) RX packets 12 bytes 950 (950.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 12 bytes 852 (852.0 B) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 sh-5.0# iptables --list Chain INPUT (policy DROP) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT all -- 192.168.10.0/24 192.168.10.0/24 ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp spt:openvpn ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:radg ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp spt:radg ACCEPT tcp -- 192.168.10.0/24 anywhere tcp dpt:radg ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere anywhere icmp echo-reply ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy DROP) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT all -- 192.168.10.0/24 192.168.10.0/24 ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:openvpn ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:radg ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp spt:radg ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere 192.168.10.0/24 tcp spt:radg ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere anywhere icmp echo-request ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere
  4. Played a bit more. 1. installed linuxserver nzbget (as it doesn't integrate VPN). This worked fine. 2. with nzbgetvpn - I can ping it, but if I do a curl command it times out I can successfully run the curl command from my PC on the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet so my router is routing to the docker. I cannot ping the br0.10 docker from a tower command prompt. The tower is on the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet also. something is amiss and I can't figure it out. david
  5. Ok, set it back up. I can ping plex and can notify plex, so I was mistaken there. I then tried nzbgetvpn and delugevpn and I can ping them also, but cannot connect. It is making me wonder if the routing within the docker is handling the LAN setting correctly. Here are the routes in delugevpn, they look OK to me, but I'm not an expert: sh-5.0# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 172.21.90.1 128.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 128.0.0.0 172.21.90.1 128.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0 172.21.90.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.254.0 U 0 0 0 tun0 173.245.203.252 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 Here they are in sonarr: sh-5.0# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 routes for nzbget when on bridge: (this works with Sonarr on bridge) sh-5.0# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 172.21.90.1 128.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0 0.0.0.0 172.17.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 128.0.0.0 172.21.90.1 128.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0 172.17.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 172.21.90.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.254.0 U 0 0 0 tun0 192.168.1.0 172.17.0.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 209.197.16.148 172.17.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
  6. Yes, in sonarr for example, I change Plex's IP to the new one for notifications. I hit test and it cannot find plex. I moved it all back, change all the IPs in docker and applications and it works. Which is why I statically set the IP in the docker setup, so I know how to set them in each application. david
  7. Yes, I did that. I actually set the IPs in the docker setup so I know them.
  8. I put 5 (sonarr, nzbget, deluge, plex, emby) dockers all on the same network br0.10. But when I do that they cannot talk to each other. That is the gist of the problem. If they are all on bridge they work. david
  9. I just tried using br0.0, thinking it would help since it is just the 192.168.1.0 net, which is what the Tower belongs to, but no go. It cannot ping the tower IP either, but can ping everything else. david
  10. Today I have several dockers on br0.10 including plex and emby. I have several dockers on bridge, including deluge, nzbget, sonarr, couch potato. I would like to move the dockers from bridge to br0.10. When I do this, they kind of work. I can get to their web interfaces, they can get to the internet, but sonarr cannot get to deluge or nzb. I can open a bash in the sonarr docker and ping the br0.10 ip for deluge, but for whatever reason sonarr cannot find deluge. This obviously breaks everything. Is there something I have to do differently with the br0.10 setup to get this to work? Currently I have plex and emby on br0.10 because that is the vlan my TV/nvidia shild is on and it makes network traffic a bit better. However, sonarr and couch potato cannot notify them of updates as they are on bridge. Is this even possible? Does my question make sense? thanks david
  11. When I connect to a VM using noVNC, I can't cut-n-paste. Is there a way to do this? thanks david
  12. For a specific question. I have the <WebUI>http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/</WebUI> set in my template.xml, but when I click on the Docker Icon I only see _console, no WebUI option. The webserver is running and I can connect to it. Is there something else I need to add to get the WebUI option for the context sensitive menu? thanks david
  13. gotify looks really interesting. I was able to run its docker command and it ran, though I have no idea what happens under the hood of UnRaid. It appears in the docker page under some name. I think this is a very interesting piece of the solution. Still interested in documentation on how to make an UnRaid compatible dockerfile/xml. EDIT: https://wiki.unraid.net/index.php/DockerTemplateSchema david
  14. I just started using a Hubitat Elevation for my home automation. They dropped SMS support for Twilio, but someone created a nice add-on to restore this functionality. It needs a linux (most people use an rPi) with node-js, npm and sendmail installed. https://github.com/adsavia/Hubitat-DoNS I'd like to make a docker so that I can run this service on my UnRaid box, but really have no idea how to go about it. I thought there was a post here somewhere that taught you how to do this. Any pointers/help much appreciated. thanks david
  15. Ok not an issue with Sonarr. Everything works fine if I run through a VPN, or if I setup Sonarr on br.10 or br.20. I think it is something wrong with my new ISP. david