Everything posted by Stokkes
-
[Plug-In] Community Applications
I have a build ready that *should* be completely popup free when in appFeed mode (at least it doesn't trigger Chrome / Firefox / IE's popup blocker -> unable to test in Safari). It actually significantly simplified the rendering code, so it will become standard on the next release. If you (anyone) wants to try it out, let me know. Definitely interested in trying it out. As it stands, I can't get it to work at all unless I disable all pop-up blocking in Safari. Not quite sure what's going on.
-
[Plug-In] Community Applications
Don't worry about it for now. Will do some more testing tomorrow, and on a clean Mac user profile to see if it's something I have installed in Safari.
-
[Plug-In] Community Applications
Actually, even with appFeed it doesn't seem to work on Safari. Will try on a different Mac.
-
[Plug-In] Community Applications
Safari doesn't have site specific popup blocking / whitelisting. Even the iPad didn't work unless I disabled all popups from the settings. This isn't ideal though.
-
[Plug-In] Community Applications
Update Seems to be an issue with Safari on the Mac, Chrome works. Maybe have a look for a future update? Cheers, --- Hello, Just setting up a new v6 box after not using unRAID for a good 2-3 years. I installed the CA plugin, but when I click "Add" on any of the applications, nothing happens. There is no visual cue in the UI, nothing in the syslog. None of the "Add" buttons seem to work. Any way I can start troubleshooting this? Thanks,
-
cache_dirs - an attempt to keep directory entries in RAM to prevent disk spin-up
I'll preface this by saying I haven't read the entire thread.. But for Joe.. I'm noticing that executing a cache_dirs -q will sometimes result in the process not fully getting killed or taking a VERY long time to kill all the spawned processes. I'm using an rc.cache_dirs with your unraid_addon_control.sh which works fine for everything I use it for (notify, sab, sickbeard, lighttpd, etc.) but with the cache_dirs, it executes the command to -q but I would say 50% of the time, it won't fully quit, requiring me to ssh/telnet into the unraid box and force kill the "orphaned" processes. Any idea why this is happening?
-
[SOLVED] Headless System - Beep When Booted sucesfully
Slightly longer version (make sure this is 1 line... don't use nano, use vi if you do it via the shell). beep -f 330 -l 137 -n -f 330 -l 275 -n -f 330 -l 137 -d 137 -n -f 262 -l 137 -n -f 330 -l 275 -n -f 392 -l 550 -d 550 -n -f 262 -l 412 -n -f 196 -l 137 -d 275 -n -f 164 -l 137 -d 137 -n -f 220 -l 275 -n -f 247 -l 137 -d 137 -n -f 233 -l 137 -n -f 220 -l 275 -n -f 196 -l 205 -n -f 330 -l 205 -n -f 392 -l 275 -n -f 440 -l 275 -n -f 349 -l 137 -n -f 392 -l 137 -d 137 -n -f 330 -l 275 -n -f 262 -l 137 -n -f 294 -l 137 -n -f 247 -l 412 -n -f 262 -l 412 -n -f 196 -l 137 -d 275 -n -f 164 -l 275 -d 137 -n -f 220 -l 275 -n -f 247 -l 137 -d 137 -n -f 233 -l 137 -n -f 220 -l 275 -n -f 196 -l 205 -n -f 330 -l 205 -n -f 392 -l 275 -n -f 440 -l 275 -n -f 349 -l 137 -n -f 392 -l 137 -d 137 -n -f 330 -l 275 -n -f 262 -l 137 -n -f 294 -l 137 -n -f 247 -l 412 -d 275 -n -f 392 -l 137 -n -f 370 -l 137 -n -f 349 -l 137 -n -f 311 -l 275 -n -f 330 -l 137 -d 137 -n -f 207 -l 137 -n -f 220 -l 137 -n -f 262 -l 137 -d 137 -n -f 220 -l 137 -n -f 262 -l 137 -n -f 294 -l 137 -d 275 -n -f 392 -l 137 -n -f 370 -l 137 -n -f 349 -l 137 -n -f 311 -l 275 -n -f 330 -l 137 -d 137 -n -f 523 -l 275 -n -f 523 -l 137 -n -f 523 -l 550 -n -f 392 -l 137 -n -f 370 -l 137 -n -f 349 -l 137 -n -f 311 -l 275 -n -f 330 -l 137 -d 137 -n -f 207 -l 137 -n -f 220 -l 137 -n -f 262 -l 137 -d 137 -n -f 220 -l 137 -n -f 262 -l 137 -n -f 294 -l 137 -d 275 -n -f 311 -l 275 -d 137 -n -f 294 -l 275 -n -f 262 -l 550 -d 550 and another (I prefer this one): beep -f 659 -l 460 -n -f 784 -l 340 -n -f 659 -l 230 -n -f 659 -l 110 -n -f 880 -l 230 -n -f 659 -l 230 -n -f 587 -l 230 -n -f 659 -l 460 -n -f 988 -l 340 -n -f 659 -l 230 -n -f 659 -l 110 -n -f 1047-l 230 -n -f 988 -l 230 -n -f 784 -l 230 -n -f 659 -l 230 -n -f 988 -l 230 -n -f 1318 -l 230 -n -f 659 -l 110 -n -f 587 -l 230 -n -f 587 -l 110 -n -f 494 -l 230 -n -f 740 -l 230 -n -f 659 -l 460 Credit isn't mine.
-
The Enclosure Thread
What a beast! I'll keep that in mind once I reach my 15 drive limit in this case.
-
The Enclosure Thread
Too bad it only has 9 5.25" bays.. The antec 1200 has 12 5.25" bays which can support 4x 5in3's, giving you a total of 20 bays in a tower. I think this may be the maximum for a tower.. Anything more, you'll have to go to a Norco.
-
The Enclosure Thread
Bit overkill? Even with the current limit of 21 drives, you can climb up to about 40TB of usable raw space with today's technology. That's a whole heap of space. With 3TB drives coming down the pipeline in 2011, and looking like unRAID 5.1 supporting these drives (as long as current crop of motherboards support them), we could potentially see 60TB raw space.. I've only got about 7.5 so far.