heratic

Members
  • Posts

    55
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by heratic

  1. I have started having trouble with my slick vpn. the opvn file has the same key as the SlickVPN.crt in it. getting tls error. Does anyone know how to fix this 2020-05-06 16:02:34,236 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: Wed May 6 16:02:34 2020 SIGHUP[soft,tls-error] received, process restarting 2020-05-06 16:02:34,236 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: Wed May 6 16:02:34 2020 WARNING: file 'credentials.conf' is group or others accessible Wed May 6 16:02:34 2020 OpenVPN 2.4.8 [git:makepkg/3976acda9bf10b5e+] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [LZ4] [EPOLL] [PKCS11] [MH/PKTINFO] [AEAD] built on Jan 3 2020 2020-05-06 16:02:34,237 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: Wed May 6 16:02:34 2020 library versions: OpenSSL 1.1.1f 31 Mar 2020, LZO 2.10 2020-05-06 16:02:39,237 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: Wed May 6 16:02:39 2020 NOTE: the current --script-security setting may allow this configuration to call user-defined scripts 2020-05-06 16:02:39,238 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: Wed May 6 16:02:39 2020 TCP/UDP: Preserving recently used remote address: [AF_INET]151.236.14.29:443 Wed May 6 16:02:39 2020 UDP link local: (not bound) Wed May 6 16:02:39 2020 UDP link remote: [AF_INET]151.236.14.29:443
  2. Getting this error starting the docker at Function.Module._resolveFilename (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:581:15) at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:507:25) at Module.require (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:637:17) at require (internal/modules/cjs/helpers.js:22:18) at Knex (/opt/nginx-proxy-manager/node_modules/knex/lib/index.js:49:15) at Object.<anonymous> (/opt/nginx-proxy-manager/src/backend/db.js:25:33) at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:689:30) at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:700:10) at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:599:32) at tryModuleLoad (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:538:12) at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:530:3) at Module.require (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:637:17) at require (internal/modules/cjs/helpers.js:22:18) at Object.<anonymous> (/opt/nginx-proxy-manager/src/backend/migrate.js:1:78) at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:689:30) at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:700:10) code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND' } [app] starting Nginx Proxy Manager... [3/4/2020] [11:31:18 AM] [Global ] › ✖ error Cannot find module './dialects/mariadb/index.js' { Error: Cannot find module './dialects/mariadb/index.js'
  3. Does anyone happen to know hot to get networking with 10Gb nics. I have tried both <model type='e1000-82545em'/> and <model type='vmxnet3'/> br0 and virbr0 Can't get openfiler to see any NIC.
  4. did you ever get this resolved?
  5. Make sure you boot unraid in legacy mode not uefi
  6. So were you also able to pass through USB controllers in other PCI-E slots. How many GPUs could you pass through? I currently have 3 passed through on my intel system
  7. first time build. Do yourself a favor and just go intel. Unless you love to solve problem after problem and you more interest in fixing your computer and issues rather than using it. Ryzen support has got better I'm told but Intel just works. Out of the box. Like you would expect.
  8. Hi, I'm considering building a new server. Thinking of going Intel again because AMD is a headache that I can't be bothered dealing with atm as I have 2 kids and a busy life. I can't find any solid information online. Does anyone know if hardware passthrough works on EPYC, like you would expect it to for a server platform or is it like threadripper. I wouldn't mind building a EPYC system but not if it going to be 6 months of tinkering and never getting to use it. Like my ryzen system that got thrown in the shed for 3 months. Has anyone Got a EPYC system up and running yet?
  9. I'm just wondering if there's going to be a way to change from the 5.7.2 unstable branch back to the stable branch once 5.7.x is released to stable.
  10. So are you saying you can passthrough GTX geforce cards through on ESXi? I have always read that was not possible. When did that change?
  11. i only stress test in bare metal windows. There's no way i would do it in unraid.
  12. I had to switch to Seabios because OVMF stopped booting. I have Always found Seabios better for windows anyway
  13. 4.8Ghz is all i can get out of my system and keep them temps under 90c during extended stress testing. volts are set to 1.28 but looking at monitoring software its closer to 1.3v. i don't have g-force experience installed it that's what game stream is part of. i have used steam game streaming no problems though. We should find a few benchmarks that have scores. ie 3d mark, tomb raider, LOTR mordor, company of heroes 2, valley, heaven or whatever and compare scores. no driver optimizations and no overclock on the gpu's, 100% power limit, to get a base line of VM performance. if you could get your cpu stable at 4.8Ghz that would be ideal as returning to stock would be a hassle for me. I will hopefully get a chance over the weekend to do this and post them back in this tread. Let me know what games your interested in comparing. My VM will consist of: 4-Core/8-Thread 16GB RAM GTX 1080ti USB Controller Passthrough Installed on Samsung 850 Pro SSD
  14. I have two 1080tis. No third GPU just booting off a rom. I haven't had any issues with the graphics card drivers. Also overclocked the cpu to 4.8 on all cores. so far so good. played PUBG for a few hours last night. 3440x1440 on new map i get around 80 to 99fps. FPS are capped @ 99 on my machine. Old map sits around 60fps. all settings maxed out. gpu power set to 90% no overclock. just what i mine at so left it. Both 1080tis are watercooled.
  15. Woops i have had all my Unraid gaming rigs overclocked. Just not my unraid nas box. Had my 6950x running at 4.4Ghz for ages and never had any issues. 5960x before that. I got 2 gaming VM's running with 4 cores each. HT on. Let me know what game you want to bench and if I have it I will be happy to bench it and put the results up here. So far the performance compared to my 6950x overclocked it better. not sure if being on 6.4 might have made a difference though. Also, the GPUs perform a little better as well.
  16. Also my 7900x is the same performance stock as my 6950x was overclocked to 4.3Ghz on all cores. Can't wait to see how it performs overclocked. Gpu performance also seems to be slightly improved on 6.4 as well
  17. I just upgraded to the prerelease 6.4 and my performance is back to normal. Should hopefully fix your issue as well
  18. I'm in the same situation. Same setup except a msi board. I'm thinking of upgrading to the experimental branch.
  19. Just pass through primary card. That's what i do. I also have 2 1080ti's Edit should add that i only have two 1080ti's installed in my machine. Have been ruining unraid headless for around a year now without any problems. Originally had a 1080. Also install 6.4 if you haven't already. Much better performance in x299 systems. https://forums.lime-technology.com/topic/41951-gpu-passthrough-with-only-one-card/
  20. At the moment it's probably not worth it if your just in it for the money. It's more about supporting the projects in the infancy because you like the idea of encrypted cloud storage. I imagine once they improve there products and gain more main stream market adoption they may become more worth while. If you already have a machine that runs 24/7 and has spare HDD space. SIA is very easily in development Sent from my SM-N930F using Tapatalk
  21. SIA is trustless. There's no centeral organization that distributes the money like Storj Sent from my SM-N930F using Tapatalk
  22. I prefer SIA but they need a better UI Sent from my SM-N930F using Tapatalk
  23. EVGA founders edition but pretty sure it would work for any reference card.