Jump to content

TechGeek01

Members
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TechGeek01

  1. I haven't yet spun up a second server/instance to test the beta, but wanted to ask. Has the autostart VM issue been fixed from 6.8.3? I have no idea if this hasn't been addressed, or if it was fixed in this, or a previous beta, but on 6.8.3, "autostart" VMs don't actually autostart on boot. I have to manually start them.
  2. I don't use GUI mode often, but I usually set it to boot there by default, so that on the off chance I can't get to the web GUI if it locked up, or if there's a network problem, I can reconfigure it and such. I actually had to downgrade the BMC to 3.77 because 3.80 and up didn't work in GUI mode. When I moved to this new Supermicro server from the Dell R510, the network changed, so I wouldn't have been able to get to it on another computer. It actually looks like it boots normally, and then as soon as the scrolling text goes away and you're supposed to be dumped at the login screen, it's just black. So yeah, if that latest driver could be included with the rest of the Aspeed stuff if it's not already, and verified to work on updated 3.88 on an X10 board, that would be awesome!
  3. Thanks for the addition of the Aspeed driver! On that note, I have a Supermicro X10-DRi running Unraid, and with the latest firmware for the BMC, I can't boot into GUI mode. I just get a black screen after all the scrolling text instead of the login screen that should show up. I actually had to revert to BMC firmware 3.77, as 3.80 and up do not work with GUI mode. This was failing for me on Unraid 6.8.3 after migrating the USB from my old server. Are you guys by chance able to confirm that the latest Aspeed driver you've included works in GUI mode on this latest firmware for the board? For reference, X10 is based on the ASPEED AST 2400 controller. Seems like this same latest driver is required for almost all X10 motherboards, so if you could confirm that a Supermicro X10 board with IPMI firmware 3.80 or later can successfully boot into GUI mode, that would be amazing.
  4. Let me start out by saying, I realize that this doesn't apply as much in enterprise situations. However, given that Unraid has the ability to add arbitrary drives to the array, it's much more common in the homelab community than something like FreeNAS, which pretty much requires you already have all the drives you're using. I believe the homelab community, while not all of Unraid, is a large part of the Unraid community, and would benefit here. A lot of us in this homelab community need, or want, a cheap way to back up data offsite, and probably have other hard drives lying around. The logical conclusion here is to pop a drive into Unraid, format it, and copy data over. And I'm sure a lot of us, myself included, would like to encrypt this data. Given that Unraid uses the key files stored locally to encrypt drives, this makes it dead simple, because you don't have to enter a passkey, or even think. You just mount the drives, and they get decrypted. This is great for security in case these drives fall in the wrong hands if they're being stored elsewhere. Encryption seems to be most commonly encrypted XFS, to match the XFS typically used in the main array. The current solution for encrypted data here is to modify the cache pool. This involves a bunch of steps: Stop the array If you have multiple cache drives in a pool, drop that down to 1 Confirm that you want to start with the missing cache drives, and start the array Stop the array again Stop and disable Docker containers and VMs that live on the cache (and can't run with the legitimate cache drives missing) Change cache filesystem to encrypted XFS (since you can't do XFS on cache with multiple drives) Swap the "cache" drive to the drive you intend to back up to Start the array Format the disk Stop the array Put your cache FS back to what it was before Swap the cache drives back to what they were, in the right order Start the array again From there, you can use Unassigned Devices to mount the now encrypted drive, and copy data to it. This works flawlessly if you do it correctly, but it's a seemingly dangerous process, and is at the risk of losing data that lives on cache if you misstep. I think we can all agree that this is a lengthy, and potentially risky process, to obtain a drive formatted with an encrypted filesystem that Unraid knows how to decrypt. I understand that 6.9 plans to bring multiple pools into the equation, which will help this greatly, but I assume it would be much cleaner to be able to have the option to take an unassigned drive that's not part of the array or cache, and be able to choose a filesystem to format it in. This way, without having to stop the array to reconfigure cache, or another pool (and thus, disrupting Docker, and VMs in the process, as well as any live transfers or work to or from the array itself), we could pop a drive in, and be able to format it as any filesystem Unraid supports.
×
×
  • Create New...