atl-far-east
Members-
Posts
31 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Everything posted by atl-far-east
-
I put this in the site configuration for the Unraid admin site - but it depends on how your Nginx reverse proxy is setup. For my setup, it was /mnt/user/appdata/nginx/nginx/site-confs/default
-
Multiple pool usage question - and apologies if it's been asked before, maybe on a prior beta thread (tried searching but a bit tricky to do across all the posts). With the new pools, will it be possible to do a "raid 0"/brtfs striped pool? Context - I've got a standard pool (parity + 2 spinners), and a cache pool (2 SSDs). When setting up the cache pool I decided to go for the standard duplication vs. striping, for the data security. With the new multiple Unraid pool feature, would I be able to add a second cache-like pool, but instead of a raid 1 style pool, get a speed boost from having a raid 0 style pool setup? Or would that only be a "cache" pool feature, limited to the special cache pool? Let me know if that doesn't make sense. Thanks!
-
Not sure if this is relevant: Mar 31 04:03:04 flower root: Starting Nginx server daemon... Mar 31 04:03:04 flower root: nginx: [emerg] PEM_read_bio_DHparams("/etc/nginx/dhparam.pem") failed (SSL: error:0909006C:PEM routines:get_name:no start line:Expecting: DH PARAMETERS) Mar 31 04:03:04 flower emhttpd: shcmd (22): exit status: 1 Mar 31 04:03:04 flower emhttpd: too many devices Also, given that there are 0 drives and just a USB drive, that last line is confusing?
-
If it helps, I don't see anything listening on any web ports: root@flower:~# netstat -vatn Active Internet connections (servers and established) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:139 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:111 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:21 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:445 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:44833 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp6 0 0 :::139 :::* LISTEN tcp6 0 0 :::111 :::* LISTEN tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN tcp6 0 0 :::445 :::* LISTEN tcp6 0 0 :::46627 :::* LISTEN tcp6 0 0 fe80::1417:8aff:fe4f:22 fe80::102c:cf39:2:50580 ESTABLISHED ...which makes me think that it's emhttp/nginx not listening, rather than the connection?
-
Hey, I'm building a new server with the goal of moving drives across when I know it's working. I'm using a trial version on a USB key for now, and the new system has no hard drives/disks. The server boots OK and I can ssh in, but I can't access the Web UI. Does it need a drive in the system for the Web UI to load, or is it a problem elsewhere in the setup? Thanks
-
Dumb question: mini-PCs with external drives (eSATA?) - how?
atl-far-east replied to atl-far-east's topic in Hardware
Thanks praeses and ken-ji. Super helpful and a lot to think about for planning! -
Dumb question: mini-PCs with external drives (eSATA?) - how?
atl-far-east replied to atl-far-east's topic in Hardware
Got it, no railway spikes. Thanks! -
Dumb question: mini-PCs with external drives (eSATA?) - how?
atl-far-east replied to atl-far-east's topic in Hardware
Great, thanks Squid! Really dumb question: to use an SATA to eSATA cable with an external drive, just find a gap in the case to pull it through? Any other good procedure for that connection? Any advice on an external chassis without needing a port multiplier? -
Dumb question: mini-PCs with external drives (eSATA?) - how?
atl-far-east replied to atl-far-east's topic in Hardware
Replying to myself so I can get notified of replies, which I forgot to select! -
Dumb question: mini-PCs with external drives (eSATA?) - how?
atl-far-east posted a topic in Hardware
Hi all, I'm thinking of upgrading my unRaid server (which is a 2U system that's a little slow and very power hungry). There are lots of mini-PC builds (this is a high-end example of one) that seem to have good specs and use low power, as well as have enough SATA ports for my needs (1 cache, 1 parity, 2 drives). However, most of the mini PC cases don't have space for lots of drives (obviously). How would I go about actually using the SATA ports, then? If I had an external eSATA dock like this, could I connect it somehow? Could I use the on-board SATA port(s) and pass through a cable, or would I need an HBA (?)/RAID card instead and using a PCI-e card (with riser)? I also understand that not all motherboards support acting as a SATA port multiplier too - but not sure exactly what that impacts. Is this a terrible idea in the first place? Any advice appreciated. Thanks! -
For anyone who cares, I think I fixed this! I think it may be due to nginx not working with Websockets by default. I added these lines to the site config: proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; proxy_set_header Connection "Upgrade"; And it worked. E.g., this is the location settings for my unRAID proxy: location / { auth_basic "Restricted"; auth_basic_user_file /config/nginx/.htpasswd; include /config/nginx/proxy.conf; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme; proxy_pass http://192.168.1.106:8080; proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; proxy_set_header Connection "Upgrade"; } And now the CPU stats update in real time! Fingers crossed this is the fix.
-
Thanks FreeMan. In general the WebUI works, so the situation is OK - it's literally just the CPU stats that don't show 'live'.
-
Guessing there may not be a quick solution here... last bump in case. Thanks!
-
Hey all, Odd problem that I can't seem to troubleshoot. I have letsencrypt setup so that outside of my network I can access the unRAID web GUI from admin.domain.tld. When I'm on the network, and I access directly the server IP, the CPU loads update and show the current CPU load. When I'm using the admin.domain.tld address, everything works, except the CPU usage doesn't show/update. See screenshot attached - memory shows (but does not update, obviously) but CPU usage doesn't even load. Here's the relevant bit of my nginx config (with the actual IP). I've added all the proxy_set_header lines from Googling but they're not helping. server { listen 443 ssl; # listen 80; root /config/www; index index.html index.htm index.php; server_name admin.*; ssl_certificate /config/keys/letsencrypt/fullchain.pem; ssl_certificate_key /config/keys/letsencrypt/privkey.pem; ssl_dhparam /config/nginx/dhparams.pem; ssl_ciphers 'ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-DSS-AES128-GCM-SHA256:kEDH+AESGCM:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-GCM-SHA384:AES128-SHA256:AES256-SHA256:AES128-SHA:AES256-SHA:AES:CAMELLIA:DES-CBC3-SHA:!aNULL:!eNULL:!EXPORT:!DES:!RC4:!MD5:!PSK:!aECDH:!EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA:!EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:!KRB5-DES-CBC3-SHA'; ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on; client_max_body_size 0; location / { auth_basic "Restricted"; auth_basic_user_file /config/nginx/.htpasswd; include /config/nginx/proxy.conf; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme; proxy_pass http://192.168.1.IP:8080; } } Any ideas? Thanks!
-
Problem with WebUI / file permissions?
atl-far-east replied to atl-far-east's topic in General Support
Hmm, so I think it was related to the avahi-daemon permissions, per other searches on this forum. At least that's fixed the WebUI responsiveness! Not sure on the init permissions, will debug that separately. Thanks Squid for the help! -
Problem with WebUI / file permissions?
atl-far-east replied to atl-far-east's topic in General Support
So in the pursuit of debugging (not solved yet): In safe mode, permissions were still off I re-imaged the flash drive (well, unzipped the Zip file again) Booting to safe mode then worked Booted to normal mode and... /sbin/init lots it's +x again Seems like it's one of the plugins/dockers doing it. Any suggestions on how to debug? Anything aside from turning one off at a time? -
Problem with WebUI / file permissions?
atl-far-east replied to atl-far-east's topic in General Support
Never mind, found the safe mode option at boot! Will give the debugging suggestions a go. Thanks! -
Problem with WebUI / file permissions?
atl-far-east replied to atl-far-east's topic in General Support
Will give that a go. Excuse my ignorance (and lack of a quick answer while Googling, and not being patient enough to check every page since the WebUI is really slow..) - how do I restart in safe mode? -
Hi all, Since I added a cache drive a couple of weeks ago (and also decided to uninstall several plugins that I wasn't using), the unRAID WebUI's been really slow - it takes 20-30 seconds to load any page. I decided to reboot today just to see, and then also noticed this: shutdown: cannot execute /sbin/init When I check out init, it doesn't have execute permissions: root@Tower:~/.ssh# ls -altr /sbin/init -rw------- 1 root root 36992 Aug 6 2015 /sbin/init I'm not sure if that's a problem, and if it's a related problem. I've attached the diagnostics run. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance. tower-diagnostics-20170722-1516.zip