melmurp
-
Posts
47 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by melmurp
-
-
15 minutes ago, Nodiaque said:
It's because you create 4 port forward. You are deleting 2 that you must NOT delete that are variables and crucial for it to work. Restart from the template
Yeah, I just realized two are vars not ports
I have the dumb
*edit
Copied over world from wine version and it's all running fine... I'm seeing ~10-15% less cpu with the proton version but yet to have more than a few players (2) to test with. -
This happens if I remove and readd them
-
4 minutes ago, Nodiaque said:
Just checked and there's 2, 1 for gameport and 1 for query port.
There's 2 of each entry, 1 is for the config file, the other is for the port forwarding.
Where did you see dual port allocation?
I'm using 2 container hence the different ports
When I started the docker it tossed an error saying port already allocated and the docker cmd had 4 ports being mapped.. two dupes
*edit
I had to delete all four and readd them since I use different ports so perhaps that causes it? -
I have it running on a dual E5-2630L v2 @ 2.40GHz and it barely touches 35% usage but nose dives after 4 ppl join... yet CPU stays low. I was told... get a newer CPU... which seemed odd as.. well.. it's not bottlenecking on cpu. So now I'm trying it on a Ryzen 5 3600 to see if "newer cpu" does anything.
Grabbing the proton one now... something I did see was you have multiples UDP port entries.. guessing one was for config and other for actual ports? Docker tried to allocate them twice so I just removed one set. -
28 minutes ago, Nodiaque said:
I just created a new docker for enshrouded running on proton.
PLEASE DO NOT USE THE SAME PATH AS THE OTHER DOCKER.
This new docker will use variables from the unraid template to create the config file. Do not modify the config file as it will be overwriten.
It should appear in the CA as Enshrouded_Proton.
It is very experimental. I've taken information from another docker that is running it under Proton and adapt to make it work like my other docker. I'm not knowledgeable with Proton at all. Use at your own risk.
If you want to transfer your savegame, just wait for the server to properly start, stop then copy file in savegame over.
Have you tested this with multiple users? Do you see a difference in CPU vs wine?
I've only seen this being done via pterodactyl (was about to install redis and that today actually just to see) and they claim proton can run with 16 ppl on the same hardware as wine capping around 4.Again, appreciated all the work you're doing
-
Just wanted to chime in here as well... was going to use random docker but saw this thread.
Manually added the xml and fired it up... works out the box.+1 to adding some vars around Name/Pass so that step can be automated.
Unrelated but during a session with 3 people the game went nuts and pegged my server to 80% across 24 cores... lasted 3-5mins.
Afterwards dropped to 20%... so do keep an eye out if you see a server overloaded message during the game and report to devs to help optimize :) -
Just an fyi, a change in the Docker file looks to have broken this on unraid
https://github.com/go-shiori/shiori/issues/546 -
I was looking at this to replace OpenVPN containers that I set as network type of various dockers but I noticed that any container I set to the wireguard tunnel is using unraid's default DNS routing and not the wireguard provided one.
Likely I'm misunderstanding but shouldn't this setting dictate what the tunnel uses? Aside from manually adding -dns to every docker using the tunnel is there some setting I'm not using correctly?
-
54 minutes ago, Squid said:
Only thing fundamentally changed was that the system necessitates a re-download of the icons for the containers when first hitting either the Docker or Dashboard tab. If it's unable to do that, then it's going to keep on trying every time you hit it.
Ok, let me try hardcoding the DNS... I don't see it being blocked but it's something to try.
Thanks!
edit... even with straight to google or cloudflare slow.
If I disable dockers everything loads fine
-
This is still an issue... do I need to contact support via email directly?
-
Was hoping someone can explain the settings...
Fixed IP address (optional): - If this isn't set it grabs a x.x.x.1 IP
ENV6: Container Variable: ServerIP - What is this for if you have the ip above?
Also...
I'm running the test from cloudflare
https://www.cloudflare.com/ssl/encrypted-sni/The Secure DNS is unknown and SNI fails... I understand why SNI fails but what's happening with the DNS check?
If I check the logs or do a lookup I see it's going to 1.1.1.1 -
Was anything relating to docker presentation or the UI changed from 6.8 to 6.9?
This started happening after I upgraded
Dashboard
Spoiler
Docker screen
Spoiler
-
@ich777 Seen a lot of back and forth about mods and the Ark container.
It took me a few searches and re-reads but if you just update your template with the two extra paths below everything just works out the box. When someone googles "how to add mods to linux ark" the official steps will work with your template./mnt/cache/appdata/steamcmd/steamapps
Container Path: /serverdata/Steam/steamapps
/mnt/cache/appdata/steamcmd/steamapps
Container Path: /serverdata/serverfiles/Engine/Binaries/ThirdParty/SteamCMD/Linux/steamapps
Thanks again for all your hard work!
Also thanks to fellow ark players that worked out this pathing issue
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, primeval_god said:
@melmurp @muslimsteel You might want to consider raising an issue over at https://github.com/netdata/netdata/ where the developers of Netdata and the Docker container reside.
9 hours ago, muslimsteel said:@primeval_god Thanks, looks like they might have an issue open for this same thing on GitHub:
https://github.com/netdata/netdata/issues/9084
Thanks guys, seems they fixed it so just need to wait for the next release
-
Started getting fork errors and tons of odd behavior... turned out something was creating a massive amount of processes.
That something is netdata
I've ran this for months and no issue but since the switch it seems things aren't working the same
Note that I'm using the default config and haven't touched any settings.
201 is netdata and I waited 5s between commands... if I leave this going it'll just keep creating processes until my machine starts to throw errors after a few days.
ps --no-headers auxwwwm | cut -f1 -d' ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
2 100
2 daemon
2 message+
3 ntp
4 102
4 avahi
4 rpc
5 103
27 472
33 101
168 nobody
194 sshd
260 201
1677 rootps --no-headers auxwwwm | cut -f1 -d' ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
2 100
2 daemon
2 message+
3 ntp
4 102
4 avahi
4 rpc
5 103
27 472
33 101
168 nobody
194 sshd
352 201
1672 rootI check what the processes are and I see hundreds of these
201 12273 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct>
201 12470 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct>
201 12711 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct>
201 12895 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct>
201 13054 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct>
201 13235 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct>
201 13415 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct>I'm not sure where netdata logs are so I don't know what it's trying to do that keeps spinning... any thoughts?
-
What does the docker log show?
I had this happen to me once and it was because suddenly plex switched to https on my lan so ignore http requests. -
2 hours ago, binhex said:
yeah i wasnt suggesting removing all dhcp options, just dns, but as you pointed out its already filtered in the ovpn config file, so im a bit perplexed as to why the option still gets pushed!.
did you put in the ipv6 filter options in the ovpn file, im assuming so, right?.
can you try changing the filter in the ovpn file from:-
pull-filter ignore "dhcp-option DNS6"to:-
pull-filter ignore "dhcp-option DNS"See if that successfully filters the pushed option, you dont need dns ipv4/ipv6 pushed in any manner tbh, this is defined by you in the name_servers env var value, so you are in control of this (and rightly so).
Tue May 5 18:59:24 2020 PUSH: Received control message: 'PUSH_REPLY,dhcp-option DNS 10.51.0.1,dhcp-option DNS fd54:20a4:d33b:b10c:01B1:33::1,redirect-gateway def1,redirect-gateway ipv6,sndbuf 524288,rcvbuf 524288,explicit-exit-notify,comp-lzo no,tun-ipv6,route-gateway 10.51.0.1,topology subnet,ping 10,ping-restart 60,ifconfig-ipv6 fd54:20a4:d33b:b10c:1b1:33:0:1002/112 fd54:20a4:d33b:b10c:1b1:33:0:1,ifconfig 10.51.0.4 255.255.0.0,peer-id 0,cipher AES-256-GCM'
Tue May 5 18:59:24 2020 Pushed option removed by filter: 'dhcp-option DNS 10.51.0.1'
Tue May 5 18:59:24 2020 Pushed option removed by filter: 'dhcp-option DNS fd54:20a4:d33b:b10c:01B1:33::1'
Tue May 5 18:59:24 2020 Pushed option removed by filter: 'redirect-gateway ipv6'
Tue May 5 18:59:24 2020 Pushed option removed by filter: 'tun-ipv6'
Tue May 5 18:59:24 2020 Pushed option removed by filter: 'ifconfig-ipv6 fd54:20a4:d33b:b10c:1b1:33:0:1002/112 fd54:20a4:d33b:b10c:1b1:33:0:1'I figured out the issue... the NS I was using is one I got from the provider but it only works on their network (I just realized it's a private ip) and seems only on specific networks. They must've moved things around causing the NS I was using to have no route for the server I was using.
I'll keep in eye on it and adjust it accordingly... for some services I use I need the DNS and the IP to resolve to the same country while others work fine if they differ.
Sorry for the hassle
-
6 minutes ago, binhex said:
i personally think we should filter out all dhcp-options for dns, as we want to be in control as to what name servers we use, what do you think?.
Actually.. I think my provider is misbehaving...
pull-filter ignore "dhcp-option DNS6"
They have DNS for both the ipv4 and ipv6 in the push
Removing the dhcp would probably work for most providers... unfortunately it would break for mine as they don't have a static list and it changes based on which server you select. They have a multiple ovpn files per zone that has 10 or so servers listed... all reply back with different DNS. I'd probably have to run the docker once to pull the DNS then plug that ip in and rerun it.
-
32 minutes ago, binhex said:
any chance you can attach the log, i can put in exclusions for ipv6 options if i know what they are.
I see the filters are already in the openvpn cmd and it does remove and binds to an ipv4 dns ip but the resolves timeout... perhaps that dns server on their end is down or not working.
pull-filter ignore "dhcp-option DNS6"
pull-filter ignore "tun-ipv6"
pull-filter ignore "ifconfig-ipv6"
pull-filter ignore "redirect-gateway ipv6"Attached working and non working logs
-
37 minutes ago, binhex said:
can you do the following, i would like to see the full log:-
https://github.com/binhex/documentation/blob/master/docker/faq/help.md
That gave me the info I needed... it's the vpn server causing it...
I switched nodes and it didn't push down any ipv6 while the previous one didI'll follow up with my provider.. seems they have at least one box forcing an ipv6 dns regardless of client support
-
Did openvpn change their defaults? I'm seeing this now but I don't see anything in the scripts with these flags.
I have ipv6 disabled in unraid and tried adding filters to my ovpn but still hung up
Tue May 5 10:01:27 2020 GDG6: remote_host_ipv6=n/a
Tue May 5 10:01:27 2020 ROUTE6: default_gateway=UNDEF
Tue May 5 10:01:27 2020 OpenVPN ROUTE6: OpenVPN needs a gateway parameter for a --route-ipv6 option and no default was specified by either --route-ipv6-gateway or --ifconfig-ipv6 options -
4 hours ago, GuildDarts said:
Im fairly certain that this issue is the same one that @capt.asic report (like they suggested)
are you on version '2020.04.22' thats the one with the fixInteresting, plugin says 2020.04.16 but app repo says 2020.04.22 and no option to update... lately I've seen "Backup in use" banner for Apps and it's been really slow to populate. Guess I'll just wait and see
Tks
EDIT: Looks like it was tied to those issues github has been having the last couple days... it updated and looks good!
-
1 hour ago, melmurp said:
That was it... tks!
Wasn't obvious to me they needed to be added one by oneSpoke too soon
I have them in my list but all of them resolve to the last docker in the list
If I select WebUI for any of these it always goes to netdata
-
2 hours ago, GuildDarts said:
im guessing you're referring to multiple buttons.
When you press "edit folder" there is a blue button called "Add another Button" press it and you should get a popup with options for buttons
That was it... tks!
Wasn't obvious to me they needed to be added one by one
I've ran this for months and no issue but since the switch it seems things aren't working the same
[Support] Nodiaque - Gameserver docker
in Docker Containers
Posted
I can confirm and thought the same thing... Proton is just Wine but something is happening under the covers with their game engine that seems to really prefer Proton over Wine as I'm seeing better performance as well.