melmurp

I have a 5070 TI working with this docker, which Cuda version are you on? Support was added in 12.8 I think Tue Jan 27 21:41:33 2026 +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | NVIDIA-SMI 580.95.05 Driver Version: 580.95.05 CUDA Version: 13.0 | +-----------------------------------------+------------------------+----------------------+ | Processes: | | GPU GI CI PID Type Process name GPU Memory | | ID ID Usage | |=========================================================================================| | 0 N/A N/A 2197523 C /comfy/mnt/venv/bin/python3 336MiB | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Tensor compile is busted but that's an issue with cuda itself I believe.

Can happens if you touched the requirements.txt file and it doesn't match git repo anymore... comfyui then refuses to upgrade properly Quick fix is to update comfyui-frontend-package== to higher version then restart comfyui. I think I just deleted the file then did an update and it pulled fresh

I noticed a new TORCH_LOCK field was added to the template and set to required, the README makes it seem like this is optional. If you disable the required flag it will fail to start but if you delete the parameter it comes up fine. Right now this forces the user to set it correctly or delete it from the template which was confusing to me as that's not stated in the README *EDIT: I also notice on fresh install the config.ini network_mode is set to public instead of personal_cloud so you can't install nodes They also moved it so their wiki is outdated.. I found it under ./user/_manager/ not ./user/default/ComfyUI-Manager/

Blackwell cards are only supported by the open source driver on unraid, so 580.

That was it.. updated to 4 and now got latest Appreciate the tip

There was a recent security bulleting pushed out about driver vulnerabilities... I'm unsure what "driver branch" is in use with this plugin and how would you manually update? This is what I see available to me on 7 beta 2 4060 Ti is the card Thanks!

Different AI tools so it varies Example: OpenedAI Speech <process_info> <gpu_instance_id>N/A</gpu_instance_id> <compute_instance_id>N/A</compute_instance_id> <pid>2093547</pid> <type>C</type> <process_name>python</process_name> <used_memory>3100 MiB</used_memory> </process_info> cat /proc/2093547/cmdlin pythonspeech.py

Sorry, some reason I don't get notifications on replies here... Think I got my answer tho... filtered by app name I'm guessing "appssupp":["plex","jellyfin","handbrake","emby","tdarr","unmanic","dizquetv","ersatztv","fileflows","frigate","Threadfin","codeproject","deepstack","nsfminer","shinobipro","foldinghome","compreface"] nvidia-smi is quite verbose so I attached as txt output.txt

I'm not using it to transcode, the memory in use is over 90% and nvidia-smi returns an active application, python in this case, with a pid but that's not being reflected in the dashboard. Here's another shot showing it using more than just the memory.. is Active app only enabled when transcoding is triggered?

Hi, I was curious why the active apps seems to be always empty on the dashboard. If I run nvidia-smi -q I get a process list with the application and vram in use. I have everything enabled in the nvidia section and general Thanks!

I can confirm and thought the same thing... Proton is just Wine but something is happening under the covers with their game engine that seems to really prefer Proton over Wine as I'm seeing better performance as well.

Yeah, I just realized two are vars not ports I have the dumb *edit Copied over world from wine version and it's all running fine... I'm seeing ~10-15% less cpu with the proton version but yet to have more than a few players (2) to test with.

This happens if I remove and readd them

When I started the docker it tossed an error saying port already allocated and the docker cmd had 4 ports being mapped.. two dupes *edit I had to delete all four and readd them since I use different ports so perhaps that causes it?

I have it running on a dual E5-2630L v2 @ 2.40GHz and it barely touches 35% usage but nose dives after 4 ppl join... yet CPU stays low. I was told... get a newer CPU... which seemed odd as.. well.. it's not bottlenecking on cpu. So now I'm trying it on a Ryzen 5 3600 to see if "newer cpu" does anything. Grabbing the proton one now... something I did see was you have multiples UDP port entries.. guessing one was for config and other for actual ports? Docker tried to allocate them twice so I just removed one set.

Have you tested this with multiple users? Do you see a difference in CPU vs wine? I've only seen this being done via pterodactyl (was about to install redis and that today actually just to see) and they claim proton can run with 16 ppl on the same hardware as wine capping around 4. Again, appreciated all the work you're doing

Just wanted to chime in here as well... was going to use random docker but saw this thread. Manually added the xml and fired it up... works out the box. +1 to adding some vars around Name/Pass so that step can be automated. Unrelated but during a session with 3 people the game went nuts and pegged my server to 80% across 24 cores... lasted 3-5mins. Afterwards dropped to 20%... so do keep an eye out if you see a server overloaded message during the game and report to devs to help optimize :)

Just an fyi, a change in the Docker file looks to have broken this on unraid https://github.com/go-shiori/shiori/issues/546

I was looking at this to replace OpenVPN containers that I set as network type of various dockers but I noticed that any container I set to the wireguard tunnel is using unraid's default DNS routing and not the wireguard provided one. Likely I'm misunderstanding but shouldn't this setting dictate what the tunnel uses? Aside from manually adding -dns to every docker using the tunnel is there some setting I'm not using correctly?

Was hoping someone can explain the settings... Fixed IP address (optional): - If this isn't set it grabs a x.x.x.1 IP ENV6: Container Variable: ServerIP - What is this for if you have the ip above? Also... I'm running the test from cloudflare https://www.cloudflare.com/ssl/encrypted-sni/ The Secure DNS is unknown and SNI fails... I understand why SNI fails but what's happening with the DNS check? If I check the logs or do a lookup I see it's going to 1.1.1.1

@ich777 Seen a lot of back and forth about mods and the Ark container. It took me a few searches and re-reads but if you just update your template with the two extra paths below everything just works out the box. When someone googles "how to add mods to linux ark" the official steps will work with your template. /mnt/cache/appdata/steamcmd/steamapps Container Path: /serverdata/Steam/steamapps /mnt/cache/appdata/steamcmd/steamapps Container Path: /serverdata/serverfiles/Engine/Binaries/ThirdParty/SteamCMD/Linux/steamapps Thanks again for all your hard work! Also thanks to fellow ark players that worked out this pathing issue

Thanks guys, seems they fixed it so just need to wait for the next release https://github.com/netdata/netdata/pull/9107

Started getting fork errors and tons of odd behavior... turned out something was creating a massive amount of processes. That something is netdata I've ran this for months and no issue but since the switch it seems things aren't working the same Note that I'm using the default config and haven't touched any settings. 201 is netdata and I waited 5s between commands... if I leave this going it'll just keep creating processes until my machine starts to throw errors after a few days. ps --no-headers auxwwwm | cut -f1 -d' ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n 2 100 2 daemon 2 message+ 3 ntp 4 102 4 avahi 4 rpc 5 103 27 472 33 101 168 nobody 194 sshd 260 201 1677 root ps --no-headers auxwwwm | cut -f1 -d' ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n 2 100 2 daemon 2 message+ 3 ntp 4 102 4 avahi 4 rpc 5 103 27 472 33 101 168 nobody 194 sshd 352 201 1672 root I check what the processes are and I see hundreds of these 201 12273 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct> 201 12470 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct> 201 12711 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct> 201 12895 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct> 201 13054 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct> 201 13235 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct> 201 13415 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? ZNs 21:08 0:00 [timeout] <defunct> I'm not sure where netdata logs are so I don't know what it's trying to do that keeps spinning... any thoughts?

Tue May 5 18:59:24 2020 PUSH: Received control message: 'PUSH_REPLY,dhcp-option DNS 10.51.0.1,dhcp-option DNS fd54:20a4:d33b:b10c:01B1:33::1,redirect-gateway def1,redirect-gateway ipv6,sndbuf 524288,rcvbuf 524288,explicit-exit-notify,comp-lzo no,tun-ipv6,route-gateway 10.51.0.1,topology subnet,ping 10,ping-restart 60,ifconfig-ipv6 fd54:20a4:d33b:b10c:1b1:33:0:1002/112 fd54:20a4:d33b:b10c:1b1:33:0:1,ifconfig 10.51.0.4 255.255.0.0,peer-id 0,cipher AES-256-GCM' Tue May 5 18:59:24 2020 Pushed option removed by filter: 'dhcp-option DNS 10.51.0.1' Tue May 5 18:59:24 2020 Pushed option removed by filter: 'dhcp-option DNS fd54:20a4:d33b:b10c:01B1:33::1' Tue May 5 18:59:24 2020 Pushed option removed by filter: 'redirect-gateway ipv6' Tue May 5 18:59:24 2020 Pushed option removed by filter: 'tun-ipv6' Tue May 5 18:59:24 2020 Pushed option removed by filter: 'ifconfig-ipv6 fd54:20a4:d33b:b10c:1b1:33:0:1002/112 fd54:20a4:d33b:b10c:1b1:33:0:1' I figured out the issue... the NS I was using is one I got from the provider but it only works on their network (I just realized it's a private ip) and seems only on specific networks. They must've moved things around causing the NS I was using to have no route for the server I was using. I'll keep in eye on it and adjust it accordingly... for some services I use I need the DNS and the IP to resolve to the same country while others work fine if they differ. Sorry for the hassle

Actually.. I think my provider is misbehaving... pull-filter ignore "dhcp-option DNS6" They have DNS for both the ipv4 and ipv6 in the push Removing the dhcp would probably work for most providers... unfortunately it would break for mine as they don't have a static list and it changes based on which server you select. They have a multiple ovpn files per zone that has 10 or so servers listed... all reply back with different DNS. I'd probably have to run the docker once to pull the DNS then plug that ip in and rerun it.