Everything posted by thatsthefrickenlightning
-
[Support] binhex - Plex
I bit the bullet late last night and installed the linuxserver PMS container to see if I could garner more info. Lo and behold, after giving that container access to the Intel iGPU, I could transcode three whole streams of my 4K HDR file to 1080p simultaneously with a speed of ~1.5. How much ram does Plex have available for you, Arturo? Because while it's performing much better, you're still doing better than that. @binhex, unless I'm doing something else wrong, I suspect your container is missing the library and driver to tone map HDR->SDR in hardware with an Intel iGPU (info). I cannot transcode & tone map one 4K HDR file to a 1080p SDR stream on your container without buffering but on linuxserver's container, I can do three. @SloppyG, I think this is relevant to you as well.
-
[Support] binhex - Plex
Thanks for your reply, but subtitles are disabled in my tests.
-
[Support] binhex - Plex
Hi, thanks a lot for your reply. I'm not sure the info you posted demonstrates that tone mapping is working on your system, though. I see no mention of HDR or anything of the sort in the sample file you posted. Since my post I've upgraded from an i3-6100 (Skylake) to an i3-7100 (Kaby Lake, so 10-bit h.265 encode/decode capability is there now), but my sample 4K HDR file still won't play on clients that are not HDR capable. Transcode speed is simply not above 1.0 and my dashboard shows CPU usage is high (66%+ on all 4 cores/threads) and the iGPU is being left largely alone. Files that are h.265 but without HDR are converted by the iGPU without issue. Would love to hear your thoughts. Specifically, I think I need to find out how I can check if the drivers mentioned in the Plex support article are present. Another thought: that Plex support page says 'HDR to SDR tone mapping support is currently available as a Plex Pass preview'. If that info is still up-to-date, shouldn't we be using the container binhex/arch-plexpass? I say that, because binhex says that container will 'allow Plex Pass account holders to get early access to new features'. Am I simply on the wrong container? EDIT: on 2nd though, the option to enable tone mapping is in the settings, so it seems we're on the right version. So it's a driver thing? Thanks. EDIT: to add, I was thinking the i3-7100 simply wasn't strong enough, even with hardware acceleration enabled. This post however says that multiple high-bitrate 4K HDR transcodes & tone maps should work just fine. Jesus, this has me so frustrated.
-
[Support] binhex - Plex
Hello, I've got a problem with tone mapping hdr to sdr. My system (i3-6100) cannot tone map even a single 1080p ~6mbit hdr10 stream to 1080p sdr. Transcode speed does not go over 1.0. Intel Quick Sync is enabled and works (i see 'HW' in Tautulli), but I suspect the necessary dependencies that the Plex devs talk about here are missing, and that the tone mapping is done in software and only the rest of the transcode work is done by QSV. Are my suspicions right? How do I check for the presence of the “libOpenCL” library and “Beignet” GPU driver and how do I install them? Or maybe it would be easier to switch to a different Plex Server container? Many thanks. EDIT: Or my i3-6100 simply does not support hdr->sdr tone mapping in hardware? EDIT 2: I've discovered my i3-6100 doesn't support hardware decoding of 10-bit h.265 files, so that's where the slow transcode speed and high cpu usage is coming from. If anyone can tell me, I'd still like to know if this container is equipped for tone mapping by means of Quick Sync and if my i3-6100 is capable on tone mapping at all. Wikipedia has me suspecting it's not, but the info feels incomplete ('hdr10 tone mapping per qsv 7 but nothing on DV'). Thanks.
-
***GUIDE*** Plex Hardware Acceleration using Intel Quick Sync
Just walked through this guide. I had to enable the ipgu in the bios, which required me to borrow a vga cable from a neighbor, but after that things went pretty smoothly. Thanks a lot! This is a great improvement over software transcoding and will be sufficient for now.
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
My hero. I saw the setting, but somehow forgot to fiddle with it. I feel a bit silly now. I've donated to you again. Thank you!
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
Hello everyone, hope you're all well. I'm having an issue with this docker container. Until a few days ago, I could access the webui while away from home by way of the Wireguard access server built into Unraid. Lately though, requests to the webui are timing out, but only when Wireguarding into my home. If I'm not on Wireguard but am connected to my home wi-fi, I can reach the webui just fine. It's not a firewall issue; if I change the port of for example Radarr to 8080, it connects fine, even through Wireguard. So it seems to be the QBVPN docker that's giving clients the cold shoulder if they VPN into the home via Wireguard. Can anyone help me out with regards to what changed or what I need to change to give my away-from-home devices the green light? Many thanks.
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
This is a bit of a side question, but since you can only see the web UI in this form of QB, I'm having an issue. I can't find torrents with tracker status 'not registered with this tracker' (i.e. deleted from site) easily. I need to click every torrent and check manually. Does anyone know of a better way to do this?
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Sonarr
You're very welcome! Perhaps this is a bit of hillbilly tech, but if you have your entire library in your torrent client and in your plex server and they should be hardlinked, you could just delete your whole Plex library. If the files are hardlinked, there should be no change in the drive space indication in unraid.
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Sonarr
I left /data and /config alone, deleted /media and created /mnt ( = /mnt) for Sonarr, Radarr and qBitTorrentvpn.
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
I'll have a go at that. No clue why one server would work and the other would not if the port forwarding api was down. Unless servers have their own api. E: current-gen Vancouver works like a charm. So either the error is untrue (no hate) or there are multiple port forward apis.
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
Doubt it. On august 25th PIA said 'Next Generation servers do not currently offer port-forwarding outside of the application'. Without port forwarding, I can't get any traffic going at all, neither in nor out.
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
Getting this now: '[warn] PIA VPN port assignment API currently down, terminating OpenVPN process to force retry for incoming port...' Will wait a bit but maybe this is the end of QBVPN until the migration to next gen is complete?
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
Switched to this endpoint on the legacy network. Working for now. Not ideal, because trackers expect me on a different ip (range), but it'll do for now. Thank you!
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
Thanks for the info. What would your alternative be? I'm impressed. If I hadn't donated already, this would get me to.
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
Thank you very much for this. I had to turn my server off for some maintenance and I thought that was the problem, but it was this. Next-gen config files work for me, but no actual torrent client activity until port forwarding is supported. Any ideas when that will be?
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
That is awesome. Thank you for the speedy reply!
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
Pardon my noobiness, but is there a way to downgrade to the previous version? I'm not connectable since 4.2. I downloaded through CA.
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
All of a sudden I can't access the webui via ip:port, but I can via hostname:port. What gives? Edit: reinstalled with new /appdata/, copied over resume data. Working again. Whatever.
-
[Support] Djoss - dupeGuru
Alright, so basically I need to point dupeGuru to drives and not shares, then? Noted. Thank you!
-
[Support] binhex - DelugeVPN
On QB, I solved it by enabling only TCP under the connections tab in the settings. Bally12345 and I discuss a fix for Deluge here, but it's less effective than the QB fix:
-
[Support] Djoss - dupeGuru
You're right. When checking out the two files with stat in an unRaid terminal, the system returns the same inode. Strange that Krusader returns something different. I suppose I'll believe unRaid over Krusader, though. Doubly so because deleting one of the two hardlinks yields no extra free drive space, as one would expect from working hardlinks. Here's my next puzzle, then. When I 'unleash' dupeGuru on my cache drive, where there currently resides a downloaded file and a hardlink to that same data in another folder, dupeGuru says there are no dupes. So far, so good. Now when I have dupeGuru scan the share that those two files are in, among the results are the two hardlinks that dupeGuru previously said were not dupes. How come? Appreciate the replies.
-
[Support] Djoss - dupeGuru
I check the inodes in Krusader by opening a terminal and entering 'stat file.ext' for both files.
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
Knowing you need to re-apply a bunch of settings on each start of the container?
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
Wow, that tweak does work on Deluge! Very nice. However, on each launch, I need to enable the plug-in, apply the settings and pause & resume the torrents for it to work. Does it do that for you as well? As for QB, I'm not sure which settings you're disabling exactly. Set Proxy Server Type to (none)? It's already on that for me. Edit: however, in QB, simply changing 'Enabled protocol' from 'TCP and UTP' to 'TCP' has unlocked my speeds. But that wasn't what you were referring to, right? I'm sorry, it's late and I'm tired and I should go to bed instead of wrestling my server, but I don't wanna.