Jump to content
We're Hiring! Full Stack Developer ×

I don't need the parity disks, and cache pool, I just the raid1 for some disks


Recommended Posts

HDDs go in the array, which doesn't have to have parity. But why not have parity?

 

SSDs go in pool. The first pool is often called cache, but it doesn't have to be called that, and it doesn't have to be used for caching. You can have additional pools.

 

I have a cache pool for caching, and another pool named 'fast' for appdata, domains, system, whatever

Link to comment
1 hour ago, whiteguard said:

i can bear the data lost

1 minute ago, trurl said:

HDDs go in the array, which doesn't have to have parity. But why not have parity?

Parity isn't just about not losing data, and it isn't a backup anyway. It allows a disk to be rebuilt, which is a lot easier than trying to figure out what data is missing.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...