Jump to content

Data loss when 2 drives failed


ToXIc

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, been using unraid since v4 and have replaced many drives since then. recently however was my 1st time 2 drives went bad at the same time. I'm currently on version 6.9.2 and using two parity drives. 
Before i did anything i noticed that one of the emulated drives showed nothing, my data in some folders were missing. 
Not thinking too much about it hoping it was a bug or something i proceeded with my replacement process and got my drives preclearing. I swapped them one by one leaving the badly emulated drive last. 
When i did switch to the 2nd drive the rebuild took over 12hrs and did almost 4tb of write to the drive but unfiortualtely my data still wasnt there.. am i still seeing the emulation or is my data really gone. image.png.d08b3e2da48b909297ab89ce981bd065.png

syslog

fatjoe-diagnostics-20220905-1015.zip

Edited by ToXIc
Link to comment

i click on the check mark in UD and i get 

 

FS: xfs

Executing file system check: /sbin/xfs_repair -n /dev/sdx1 2>&1

Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- zero log...
ALERT: The filesystem has valuable metadata changes in a log which is being
ignored because the -n option was used. Expect spurious inconsistencies
which may be resolved by first mounting the filesystem to replay the log.
- scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
sb_fdblocks 895215175, counted 902030091
- found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan (but don't clear) agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
- agno = 1
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
- setting up duplicate extent list...
- check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
- agno = 0
- agno = 1
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
No modify flag set, skipping phase 5
Phase 6 - check inode connectivity...
- traversing filesystem ...
- traversal finished ...
- moving disconnected inodes to lost+found ...
Phase 7 - verify link counts...
No modify flag set, skipping filesystem flush and exiting.

File system corruption detected!

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, ToXIc said:

i click on the check mark in UD and i get 

 

FS: xfs

Executing file system check: /sbin/xfs_repair -n /dev/sdx1 2>&1

Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
- zero log...
ALERT: The filesystem has valuable metadata changes in a log which is being
ignored because the -n option was used. Expect spurious inconsistencies
which may be resolved by first mounting the filesystem to replay the log.
- scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
sb_fdblocks 895215175, counted 902030091
- found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan (but don't clear) agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
- agno = 1
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
- process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
- setting up duplicate extent list...
- check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
- agno = 0
- agno = 1
- agno = 2
- agno = 3
No modify flag set, skipping phase 5
Phase 6 - check inode connectivity...
- traversing filesystem ...
- traversal finished ...
- moving disconnected inodes to lost+found ...
Phase 7 - verify link counts...
No modify flag set, skipping filesystem flush and exiting.

File system corruption detected!

 

This output suggests that the xfs_repair should be run without the -n option so that a repair rather than a check happens

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...