Jump to content

Parity check extremely slow (< 1MB/s)


tim86

Recommended Posts

Hello guys,

 

in the last couple of months I have become increasingly frustrated with Unraid and the parity algorithm. While it does SOMETIMES work to create or validate parity, most of the time (especially if I haven't done it in a while) the process is just completely broken. I have tried to debug what causes the errors that sometimes appear in the syslog, but I don't know what to do anymore. Obviously, checking 18TB of parity drive would take half a year with this speed, which is kinda stupid. Listening to the system I can also hear drives stopping and restarting (SATA issues?).

 

I have now replaced all SATA cables twice and the problem is still occuring. Any ideas how to debug?

tower-syslog-20220927-1433.zip

Link to comment

Your appdata, domains, system shares have files on the array. You want these shares all on fast pool (cache) so Docker/VM performance won't be impacted by slower array, and so array disks can spin down since these files are always open. Probably you have Dockers/VMs accessing array disks during parity check because of this.

 

Why do you have 50G docker.img?

Link to comment
Just now, trurl said:

Your appdata, domains, system shares have files on the array. You want these shares all on fast pool (cache) so Docker/VM performance won't be impacted by slower array, and so array disks can spin down since these files are always open. Probably you have dockers accessing array disks during parity check because of this.

I have recently replaced the cache disk, which is why they are currently all on the array. I also kinda don't trust the cache disk in terms of inconsistency. I did have some problems with that about 2 years ago. But because of all these stability problems I have moved basically all of my productive Docker containers off of Unraid for now anyway, so the impact shouldn't be too bad.

 

2 minutes ago, trurl said:

 

Why do you have 50G docker.img?

I remember running out of space with the default settings a couple of years ago, so I increased it. Given that my cache disk is large enough, I didn't see why it is a problem.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...