ZappyZap Posted January 29 Author Share Posted January 29 8 minutes ago, NLS said: Thanks - but no thanks. I moved to another that is self contained. That said, if I get more containers that need a stand-alone DB, I might revisit. Understandable!!! i am just the maintainer of the template not the app dev.... I could build a container self contained (with app+db) with same app tho... (unless already exist) but taht's a whole other story Quote Link to comment
NLS Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 28 minutes ago, simcole said: Which did you move to? Quote Link to comment
ZappyZap Posted January 29 Author Share Posted January 29 7 minutes ago, NLS said: I use this one as well my only concern, is , it is not maintain since 3 years ....... seems abandoned but seem still working fine .... even if i have some dicrepency when i cmpared to some others. anyway , there is option beauty of Selfhosting and Opensource 2 Quote Link to comment
NLS Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 (edited) On 1/29/2024 at 4:03 PM, ZappyZap said: I use this one as well my only concern, is , it is not maintain since 3 years ....... seems abandoned but seem still working fine .... even if i have some dicrepency when i cmpared to some others. anyway , there is option beauty of Selfhosting and Opensource Yes. On the other hand, getting support = getting lucky, when self hosting and open source. As for this container, no you are wrong. Last update was last summer (less than 6 months), which is "okayish" in my book. On other news, I was forced to delete my docker folder and reinstall everything (where everything = 42 containers ...) because a couple got messed up last night... Couldn't start, couldn't be removed... Even using portainer... Anyway. Edited January 30 by NLS Quote Link to comment
ZappyZap Posted January 29 Author Share Posted January 29 21 minutes ago, NLS said: As for this container, no you are wrong. Last update is this summer, which is "okayish" in book. will give you that one 😀 Quote Link to comment
Majrdestroy Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 Been trying to get this up and running for a day or two just out of wanting to try something and play with Docker more. I finally got a MariaDB up and running and logged into it through Adminer, I gave me user account all priviliges for the Speedtest DB I created (which is empty). I however am getting this output when I can connect now. Any direction on where this problem might be? Quote Link to comment
jchaven Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 (edited) For anyone coming here after an upgrade broke it with errors similar to this: In Connection.php line 829: SQLSTATE[HY000] [2002] Connection refused (Connection: mysql, SQL: delete f rom cache) In Connector.php line 65: SQLSTATE[HY000] [2002] Connection refused See this support thread on the developers site: https://github.com/alexjustesen/speedtest-tracker/issues/1088 Essentially, you just need to override the config change to using a "DB" back to using "file" by adding a variable with the key "CACHE_DRIVER" and a value "file". Edited February 3 by jchaven added image Quote Link to comment
jdmhammer Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Just a heads up, the issue with the cache as been resolved. It's still recommended to use the `database` driver but if your permissions are correctly configured you can use the `file` driver. Quote Link to comment
jdmhammer Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 @ZappyZap we're making progress testing a LinuxServer image instead of the one I've been building. Once it's been tested and rolled out to production I'll drop another post here as we'll want to update the template. It'll be a drop in replacement, much much faster using less memory and cpu and the image size is roughly 1/2 of what it currently is (~298MB down to ~154MB). https://github.com/alexjustesen/speedtest-tracker/issues/837 2 1 Quote Link to comment
ZappyZap Posted February 8 Author Share Posted February 8 Great @jdmhammer waiting to see it! Quote Link to comment
jdmhammer Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 @ZappyZap looks like the gents over at LSIO published their Unraid template when they built the image. To reduce duplication what's your opinion on deprecating your template? Quote Link to comment
ZappyZap Posted February 13 Author Share Posted February 13 Hi @jdmhammer i am open for that, no issue at all. can you let me know the link to the template and i will point this thread to it. Quote Link to comment
Emphatic6264 Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 Q; What is the best way to transition to the LSIO Image from the Alex one this template uses, if it is already set-up? Alex has announced he will no longer be updating his container after v17, and it will only be the LSIO one - can I just amend the repository field in this template to point the the LSIO container rather than the Alex one? Quote Link to comment
ZappyZap Posted February 23 Author Share Posted February 23 I am waiting Alex for either deprecated this template or switch to the new image. @jdmhammer Quote Link to comment
te5s3rakt Posted February 24 Share Posted February 24 (edited) this container just deleted my entire database for it, and now I've lost all my history for it! Edited February 24 by te5s3rakt database Quote Link to comment
ZappyZap Posted February 24 Author Share Posted February 24 25 minutes ago, te5s3rakt said: this container just deleted my entire database for it, and now I've lost all my history for it! what ? which container ? Quote Link to comment
clincher Posted February 24 Share Posted February 24 18 hours ago, te5s3rakt said: this container just deleted my entire database for it, and now I've lost all my history for it! You probably want to look at this: https://github.com/alexjustesen/speedtest-tracker/releases/tag/v0.16.0 It looks like your data just got moved to another table. Quote Link to comment
te5s3rakt Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 On 2/25/2024 at 5:30 AM, noties said: You probably want to look at this: https://github.com/alexjustesen/speedtest-tracker/releases/tag/v0.16.0 It looks like your data just got moved to another table. this looks like it was the issue. confused about the missing data I went digging through all the tables and found the one mentioned. thinking it was odd, I checked through recent release notes and found this. crisis averted lol Quote Link to comment
R34nimator Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 Can someone assist me and tell me why when I installed the Speedtest Tracker that when I want to activate using the webui firefox says it's unable to connect? Thank you Quote Link to comment
ZappyZap Posted April 11 Author Share Posted April 11 11 hours ago, R34nimator said: Can someone assist me and tell me why when I installed the Speedtest Tracker that when I want to activate using the webui firefox says it's unable to connect? Thank you you will need to provide more details Quote Link to comment
jim80z Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 (edited) Hi Disregard the below question........however leaving it here in case someone else finds this useful. I have never had APP_KEY defined but somewhere along the line it must have become mandatory......so when I managed to check the logs (redefined port to map host=8943 to container=80 note this has never been a problem before??) the init had stopped due to the lack of APP_KEY. Once I obtained a generated APP_KEY from https://speedtest-tracker.dev and inserted it, the docker started up no problems. Thx ---------------- Hi guys Im using the following repository "lscr.io/linuxserver/speedtest-tracker:latest" for the speedtest-tracker docker. Somewhere in the last 1.5 months one of the updates broke something and now the webui does not come up "....cant connect to the server.....". Prior to that all worked flawlessly using a seperate mysql docker instance, and the last time I used the web was the end of April. When the docker starts up (successsfuly) in unraid I have the following info (nothing has changed in many months from a parameter POV): docker run -d --name='speedtest-tracker_new' --net='bridge' -e TZ="Australia/Sydney" -e HOST_OS="Unraid" -e HOST_HOSTNAME="XXXXX" -e HOST_CONTAINERNAME="speedtest-tracker_new" -e 'DB_CONNECTION'='mysql' -e 'APP_KEY'='' -e 'DB_HOST'='x.x.x.x' -e 'DB_PORT'='3306' -e 'DB_DATABASE'='YYYYYY' -e 'DB_USERNAME'='ZZZZZZZZ' -e 'DB_PASSWORD'='AAAAAAAAAAAAA' -e 'PUID'='99' -e 'PGID'='100' -e 'UMASK'='022' -l net.unraid.docker.managed=dockerman -l net.unraid.docker.webui='http://[IP]:[PORT:8943]/' -l net.unraid.docker.icon='https://raw.githubusercontent.com/linuxserver/docker-templates/master/linuxserver.io/img/speedtest-tracker-logo.png' -p '8943:8943/tcp' -v '/mnt/cache/.Apps/appdata/speedtest-tracker':'/config':'rw' 'lscr.io/linuxserver/speedtest-tracker:latest' AAABBBCCCDDEEEE I have tried to: change the network from bridge to host.....no joy I have deleted the container and reinstalled it fresh......no joy changed the port just in case.....no joy I can open the docker CLI for speedtest and can ping out to other machines in my network Any thoughts? Anyone else with the same issues? Thanks Edited June 19 by jim80z Quote Link to comment
grsnow Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 For anyone that is using this template and wondering why your docker instance is no longer doing it's scheduled Speedtest runs, here is why. There is no longer a settings page in the docker app itself and all settings are now handled with Environment Variables. Per this webpage: https://github.com/alexjustesen/speedtest-tracker/releases/tag/v0.20.0 you now have to specify all of your settings in the template by creating each of the following variables (with examples): APP_TIMEZONE=America/New_York DISPLAY_TIMEZONE=America/New_York SPEEDTEST_SCHEDULE= # can be represented as a cron schedule same as before. SPEEDTEST_SERVERS= # you can add one or many servers separated by a comma (i.e. "123456,654321,987654"). PRUNE_RESULTS_OLDER_THAN=0 # the default is 0 which disables result pruning, this value is in days. Mine stopped working on June 8th and I only just today noticed that there were no new data points being generated until I made these changes. When v0.20.0 first came out, I did update to LSIO's version, but I don't remember seeing the remarks about the Environment Variables at the time. I recommend that the Unraid Template also be updated with these Environment Variables by the maintainer as well. Good luck out there... 1 Quote Link to comment
ZappyZap Posted June 19 Author Share Posted June 19 2 hours ago, grsnow said: I recommend that the Unraid Template also be updated with these Environment Variables by the maintainer as well. Good luck out there... I will have a look and update 1 Quote Link to comment
ZappyZap Posted June 19 Author Share Posted June 19 Actually , i completly forgot. @alex.justesen asked me to deprecate my template..... so i still update this template anyway but please use the LSIO template - Goodluck Quote Link to comment
jim80z Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 7 hours ago, grsnow said: For anyone that is using this template and wondering why your docker instance is no longer doing it's scheduled Speedtest runs, here is why. There is no longer a settings page in the docker app itself and all settings are now handled with Environment Variables. Per this webpage: https://github.com/alexjustesen/speedtest-tracker/releases/tag/v0.20.0 you now have to specify all of your settings in the template by creating each of the following variables (with examples): Thank you! After getting it to run and web properly I checked and found regular tests had stopped and I couldn't find the settings page but did find your post! Agree with you comment to update the template and @ZappyZap thankyou for looking into it!! Quote Link to comment
.thumb.jpg.bec61e4e919a9235cc4475f8cb53d5e3.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.