• Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NLS

  1. No I can't. I deleted downgrade files.
  2. Hope it releases before the end of month, because last allowed Win11 install (non-TPM) expires 31 of Oct. I am not sure if I can risk going to RC2.
  3. OK this is weird. I don't know exactly when (and definitely not how or why), because we haven't used crafty server for a few days (but kept it running), but Crafty GUI is dead. No go. Connection refused. Locally and using the IP (not a DNS issue). Crafty itself seems to work (I restarted the container and the world I autostart, works fine), but I have no administration UI and I cannot do any work on the server. I haven't changed a thing in unRAID or Crafty (I do keep everything updated). Any ideas? EDIT: ...aaaaand I fixed it. Although I still don't understand what happened. I switched from bridge to host networking. This made the GUI return. I noticed the GUI used 8000 port instead of 8008 I used to use in the bridge (it bridged 8008 to/from 8000 IIRC). Then I switched back to bridge... and it works too! I noticed that now the bridge bridges 8008 to/from 8008... I am not sure why this change (I haven't touched the ports), but now it works. Still... any ideas? Because this looks very weird.
  4. First of all make sure you just go to the "clean" URL (the IP and the port, no sub-path). If it doesn't work re-start unbalance plugin. It probably is stuck doing something.
  5. I see no mention about TPM (passthrough or virtual) for use in VMs that (more and more) start to need TPM features enabled. According to this: is coming, but is it?
  6. Gotta check latest beta, as I am not sure how to interpret your statement. You know for a fact that they will implement those in the very next update?
  7. You mean you know for a fact that a fix is coming in 6.10? (haven't checked the beta threads)
  8. Yeap... waiting for any news, as my Win11 VM stopped updating and I have deleted the return to 10 option...
  9. I already have a VM Win11 that cannot update further because of this. (also cannot go back to 10 because I deleted the files) I really hope they add it soon. Else maybe help us do it with some guide... pls.
  10. Don't worry about it. Good that it is still on the "list" at least.
  11. About a BBS (any viable BBS). Did this project freeze also? We discussed about it a few months ago, not sure how this discussion concluded.
  12. Nice. So will you post something for us soon?
  13. I'll wait for that update then thanks.
  14. No, with "17" I meant java 17, not MC 1.17. So can we define "17" now in the variable?
  15. So we put 16 even for 17? (see above) Also how about the path in the server config? Revert it to simple "java"? In new installs maybe you should default that key to 16 as most people will try and use MC 0.17.1 and above.
  16. Thanks this worked for me too. I would have found it, but when I ls /usr/lib there was no folder jvm in it... apparently there is.
  17. Something not ok after the update... I am trying to start my world server and when I click ">" it takes me to Virtual Console, where I see no new entries. It just doesn't start it, no errors, no anything. EDIT: In crafty.log I see this: 2021-09-23 22:17:00,862 - [Crafty] - CRITICAL - app.classes.minecraft_server - Minecraft server Java path does not exist... (Server was running fine before the update) EDIT #2: This is the path I have set for java (and again: was working before the update): /usr/lib/jvm/java-16-openjdk/bin/java EDIT #3: I reverted the path to a simple "java" (as it was before 1.17). This allows the server to start... but not really. It is "green" but clients cannot connect to it any more! (the world and clients are 1.17.1)
  18. TPM is required in more and more things nowadays, including installing Windows 11 on a VM. Seems that KVM on unRAID can be done to support a virtual KVM, according to this guide: Can this be implemented natively on unRAID maybe for 6.10?
  19. BTW... for some reason it got back to 180GB free after a few hours. Something that had to do with sparse virtual volumes I believe? (yes cache was empty already when I opened this thread - nothing for mover)
  20. Device size: 465.76GiB Device allocated: 307.02GiB Device unallocated: 158.74GiB Device missing: 0.00B Used: 279.46GiB Free (estimated): 185.37GiB (min: 185.37GiB) Free (statfs, df): 185.37GiB Data ratio: 1.00 Metadata ratio: 1.00 Global reserve: 447.55MiB (used: 0.00B) Multiple profiles: no Data Metadata System Id Path single single single Unallocated -- --------- --------- -------- -------- ----------- 1 /dev/sdd1 305.01GiB 2.01GiB 4.00MiB 158.74GiB -- --------- --------- -------- -------- ----------- Total 305.01GiB 2.01GiB 4.00MiB 158.74GiB Used 278.38GiB 1.08GiB 64.00KiB So, what is the 120GB diff that Krusader does not show me (even showing hidden files). It is not a couple of GB. I also did this: du -h --max-depth 1 /mnt/cache 151G /mnt/cache/system 3.9G /mnt/cache/appdata 141G /mnt/cache/domains 45M /mnt/cache/generic_caching 188M /mnt/cache/seafile 296G /mnt/cache Well the big difference is system. Seems I have no access inside system/docker/docker (I use a folder not a file docker). I am not sure the size is realistic for my dockers, but I also cannot verify it (seemingly) from Krusader as it doesn't have root access. Any ideas how to? EDIT: I tracked it down to /mnt/cache/system/docker/docker/btrfs/subvolumes In there is a huge number of (virtual) volumes, not sure if they are cleaned up properly. Some (plenty) of them seem to be same size, which doesn't look too random to me. I wonder if some dockers could/should share subvolumes.
  21. Here you are. I read two similar threads btw... One "excused" this behavior that the FS supposedly uses more than reported by unRAID (and there is a command to find the actual FS overhead - which if you ask me, unRAID should include in the free space report). The other was fixed (?) by rebooting in maintenance mode (not an easy task on a production server).
  22. Well, the title says it all. unRAID (refreshed) page reports 60% use, 300 of 500GB for my cache. In Krusader, checking the size of all folders (with "show hidden" enabled) shows 181GB in use. Where are 119GB of storage???