NLS

Sorry, I forgot to "close" this subject. You are right of course. I just considered this should probably be core functionality. Didn't notice that plugin until recently. (for someone using UNRAID almost since initial releases 20 years ago)

So, my parity check is schedules monthly and split over a few days, because I want it to happen during lower "house traffic" hours. I was two days in, server was just idling (it was not during the parity check hours - but I did reach around 36% the previous nights) and area power went down. My UPS held fine, I happened to be at home, so I made a nice clean early shutdown. Power came up. Server booted fine. But now the system reported that I canceled the parity check - not that it would continue in the next scheduled time of day. Weird since there was no reason not to resume. I didn't actually stop the parity check - it was not happening when I shut down and I shut down cleanly. Is there a way, or should I report this as a bug?

So this doesn't need the separate container approach. I trust that I could migrate from the other one by backing up config or something, right?

Can anybody compare this one with Linuxserver's one? Which is lighter, more maintained, easier to set up? (tag me if you reply to me please)

...and I fixed it again. Seems my docker network was using ipvlan... I switched to macvlan and it worked... Is this ok to leave it like that? (also I disabled, applied and re-enabled "host access" setting again... could it be this that fixed it?)

I want to re-open this thread. Since Monday, I again cannot use my fetchmail container. My Technitium DNS is working (it uses its own separate IP), my PC is resolving things using it. BUT again fetchmail cannot ping it (container-to-container), although "host access to custom networks" is still enabled since last time (that worked fine). Weirdly enough UNRAID itself (as host) ALSO cannot ping my DNS. My PC pings my DNS. I am in 7.1.2 UNRAID, but I am since way more than the beginning of the week. I feel something else changed. Maybe some plugin update? Could it be something related to tailscale? (which I don't actively use but have installed) Any ideas?

Thanks for the help, no it wasn't that. My container was proper time and timezone. BUT I found a solution nevertheless. My authenticator acted like it wasn't seeing a QR code at all (it is not that it failed to add it... it didn't even scan it). Not sure if it is an issue with latest Google Authenticator update. I then scanned it using my camera, it asked me where to open the URL in the QR and said in authenticator and this way it DID add it. That said, can you also help me please with the apparent wrongful ban I have in Crafty Controller discord? If yes please tell me so that I PM you my username there.

So, Crafty Controller added 2FA. But for some reason my Authenticator does not scan the QR properly (only this QR, not any QR... I use Authenticator fine with other systems). And I cannot manage my own server! Any ideas? Also can someone help me with something else (that relates to this)? I seem to be banned from Crafty Controller's discord. I think it happened years ago (!) when I had a chatbot virus (so I got auto-banned). Since then I haven't been unbanned because I don't know someone to ask for ops to unban me. Can someone contact them for me? Please PM me if you can, to tell you my full discord user name.

...and since nobody gave any feedback (which is a bit sad), I have to say I fixed it by clearing cookies for the address.

After last update (?), my container shows empty. Although it shows that I have 501 torrents (most seeding). What's up???

Thanks. But still would be nice to have the same functionality (with lock icon and arrows) like the default docker page.

Glad new version is out. I am missing an important thing (that I don't know if it can be fixed). I miss the ability to define the start sequence of containers, for the containers that are INSIDE a folder (like we can for containers outside folders). This is the reason I still don't use this plugin. Also, I would love a default set of folder icons (or at least the default to be A FOLDER not a question mark!).

I remember this. Yet, a rare occasion. (I am using UNRAID for several years). 7.0.1 is fine. While I was to move from 6.X to 7.X my whole server (hardware-wise) crashed and took me weeks to fix and ended up keeping only my array storage and RAM! EVERYTHING else, changed. Motherboard changed twice. (you can find the relevant threads THREE OR FOUR of them -as new issues kept pilling up- in the forum here) In other words, sh*t happens. In any case, this is FolderView2 thread, so... let's hope for good news about that soon.

I suggest NOT spending time to make compatible with 6.X. Really, the base should be 7.X for 99.99% of users. People that are scared to move, just do it. Yes 7.1 is a nice point to switch, it is "any day now". I also waited for 7.0.1 so I don't blame you. In the meantime I waiting to finally SEE this in apps.

@laromicasI hope you still support this. I have the following issues if you can help. 1) In container configuration, I changed the paths of datroot, romroot and tosort (to somewhere with more space not my cache disk). But the container again created all three folders in appdata/ROMVault! (although I deleted them before restarting container) 2) I need an extra path to see the rest of my array, so I added it in the container configuration to have /UNRAID to my /mnt/user. Yet, when I start the container, I only see "personal" (which I think is ROMVault's home directory) and three SAME NVMe devices. I have two NVMe devices, I don't have my data there (this is why I added /UNRAID) and also they show empty. How can I make the container actually mount /UNRAID? 3) I would LOVE if RomVault3cfg.xml was in some folder that is accessible to me even outside the container (maybe a copy somewhere that start and stop of container copy from and to?), so that it can be edited manually (I have SEVERAL folders etc. and I don't want to add them from the GUI but instead use my Windows RomVault3cfg.xml and edit the paths). Possible?

I don't care even if it is called Pinocchio. As long as it gets released in CA and maintained.

Oh I feel you so much man. I have two boys, 9 and 17...

...when it is released in "Apps" (hopefully), else is for few of us willing to manually install (which I suspect is a tiny percentage of UNRAID users).

Thanks for the reply, of course Real Life (tm) takes precedence.

This conversation makes me uneasy with the progress of this plugin. I mean don't get me wrong, someone takes over, then is not taking much part in the discussion about the evolution of what he has taken over, Squid publicly points out what has to be done (where someone would expect the guy who took over to reach Squid and push and silently resolve whatever issue to make it to Apps), then someone elese (not the guy who took over?) replies... looks weird. Maybe I just misunderstood what is happening though. Anyway. I guess this is what happens sometimes with free things. Hope for the best, to me (and my own setups) is not super vital, but it is functionality that could be "stock" functionality of UNRAID.

Did you check if you have set a schedule?

@alturismo thanks for the reply. This plugin will be useful to me when I can control the fans individually or ok in groups but have plenty of groups. You need to be able to cover all possibilities. For example a rack mount server could have 3 (small) fans per disk group (like 5 disks). My own "hand-made" server has a single 12" fan for every 4 disks - plus the CPU and pump (pump is always 100%). So in a future version of the plugin better be able to detect fans individually AND allow user to make a number of groups (it would be better if the groups are not a preset number, allow the user to define it). Another improvement is to use UNRAID's own numbering of fans. UNRAID in dashboard shows FAN 1, FAN 2 (which is the CPU fan!), FAN 3, FAN 4, FAN 5, FAN 6 (which is the pump). I understand that your plugin uses Linux naming of fans, but would be very helpful for the users to actually match pwm devices to UNRAID's "FAN #". Keep up the good work.

Yes very detailed explanation. I definitely need more groups indeed. (people will indeed probably need individual fan control instead of grouping) You could split the sections dynamically according to number of detected fans. I removed autofan plugin (although it is "semi-official"), as I didn't see it maintained much and also I don't think I could split controls per fan (or maybe I didn't know how). So your plugin needs the help of user scripts to work after every reboot? (to take control from BIOS first) Anyway, keep up the good work.

[about PWM fan plugin] 1) I do not understand what is this "HDD EXTRA FAN Setup (split HDD/FAN setup if wished)". What is the purpose of this. 2) I do not understand why this has even less settings than the other sections. 3) I don't understand the extra parameter for "seconds" if you say with cron you cannot control seconds and why it is only for first section (CPU?)... So, I have 4 fans + pump in my setup. - One fan is for CPU. - Pump is always full speed. - Each of the other 3 fans is for a set of 4 disks (12 disks total). I know which 4 disks are connected to which fan. Can I make this control each fan separately based on the temperature of the 4 disks it covers? (I don't think I can right now) (tag me if you reply to me please)