itimpi Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 7 minutes ago, neuronflow said: Will this requirement be lifted with 6.13? Not sure if it is intended to make it into 6.13 or we need to wait for 6.14. Quote Link to comment
neuronflow Posted January 24 Author Share Posted January 24 21 hours ago, JorgeB said: You can use cp to copy the data, move to a temp folder first, then copy back. out of laziness I now copied a folder using the dynamix file manager. It remains at the exact same size as the source (1.11TB). So the compression is either not in effect or completely uneffective? Do I need to copy to another drive first and then back? Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 2 hours ago, neuronflow said: Do I need to copy to another drive first and then back? No, as long as it's really copied, not moved. Quote Link to comment
neuronflow Posted January 24 Author Share Posted January 24 Yes, it is. Ouch, I am not sure what is wrong then. I somehow expected atleast a small effect of compression? Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 It will depend on the files used, media files for example are mostly uncompressible. Quote Link to comment
neuronflow Posted January 25 Author Share Posted January 25 Following your suggestions I now migrated to the following setup: Interestingly this had a significant effect on power consumption - after the change it looks like this: Before it was always >10W: I hope with a future update I can use my cache again, and I will not need the 2GB SD card for my "pseudo array". Even though I can send the SATA SSD to low power mode via the GUI, it is always back online after a while and will never reach it on its own (spindown delay is set to 15min). Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.