tiny-e Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 (edited) What I was able to observe: Tried to install a new container (beets, 100ish MB) Container downloaded quickly (gigabit connection) 10 minutes passed to get to this: A few minutes later, it finally finished. During all of this, my server webui was super unresponsive. It's been happening a lot lately, I'm wondering if it's anything to do with recent Unraid OS updates (as I don't remember this issue before them, but that is pretty subjective) The container shows up in the gui as not knowing if it's up to date or not. If I force update it, it then figures it out. Force update happens pretty quickly as (I'm guessing) all downloaded/extracted items are cached. Diagnostic logs attached. I'm kinda at a loss here. nimbus-diagnostics-20240316-1046.zip Edited March 16 by tiny-e Quote Link to comment
strike Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 I'm seeing this as well since updating to 6.12.8. Looks like at least some of my containers are considerably more slow/unresponsive as well. And like you the unraid webui is unresponsive whenever updating a container and takes longer time then usual. Quote Link to comment
tiny-e Posted March 20 Author Share Posted March 20 Yeah, I'm not sure what's going on. Quote Link to comment
tiny-e Posted April 5 Author Share Posted April 5 Nearly a month goes by.... The behavior still exists. As my system is unresponsive as I try to pull a docker container now... Quote Link to comment
Kilrah Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Check your Docker image is really on an SSD. Quote Link to comment
tiny-e Posted April 5 Author Share Posted April 5 (edited) Thanks for the reply -- It is: ... You know, the cache was originally part of a ZFS pool, and one drive died and I've yet to replace it. Could that be the issue? If so, can I un-pool the cache temporarily until I have a replacement in place? Edited April 5 by tiny-e Quote Link to comment
Kilrah Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Wouldn't know. Is the cache working as expected otherwise? Also it seems you're using an XFS Docker image, can't make use of the features of the default btrfs, might be contributing. Was there a specific reason to change the default? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.