Jump to content

Pending Sector Count Went Back to Zero


Recommended Posts

Noticed yesterday that the Pending Sector count on my parity disk (2TB Seagate LP drive that I bought on Black Friday) was 24.  This surprised me because the drive successfully passed 3 preclear cycles only 2 weeks ago...

 

To troubleshoot, I did this (nevermind the risk of running without a parity disk temporarily...):

Stopped the array

Unassigned the parity disk

Restarted the array without parity disk

Stopped the array

Reassigned parity disk

Restarted the array, selecting that I wanted to rebuild parity.

 

When the parity sync was done, I noted that the drive showed 0 pending sectors.  Wanting to now read all the sectors on the drive, I ran a nocorrect parity check.  The parity check is complete and the drive still shows 0 pending sectors.

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment

on read they become "pending sectors" Sectors pending reallocation at the next write.

 

So when you recreated parity, the sectors were written to and thus reallocated somewhere else.

 

I would do a periodic smart test -t long during an idle period. (disable spin down).

I would make sure I had monthly parity checks enabled.

 

If pending sectors grows, then consider RMA'ing the drive

you'll need the SEATOOLS boot cd.

 

Link to comment

Do you now have 24 reallocated sectors?

 

I guess I should have mentioned in the original post, no, there are no reallocated sectors...

 

SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate     0x000f   118   099   006    Pre-fail  Always       -       181165264
  3 Spin_Up_Time            0x0003   093   092   000    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  4 Start_Stop_Count        0x0032   100   100   020    Old_age   Always       -       75
  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   036    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  7 Seek_Error_Rate         0x000f   061   060   030    Pre-fail  Always       -       1477444
  9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       664
10 Spin_Retry_Count        0x0013   100   100   097    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
12 Power_Cycle_Count       0x0032   100   100   020    Old_age   Always       -       22
183 Runtime_Bad_Block       0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
184 End-to-End_Error        0x0032   100   100   099    Old_age   Always       -       0
187 Reported_Uncorrect      0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
188 Command_Timeout         0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
189 High_Fly_Writes         0x003a   092   092   000    Old_age   Always       -       8
190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022   074   064   045    Old_age   Always       -       26 (Lifetime Min/Max 21/35)
191 G-Sense_Error_Rate      0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       13
193 Load_Cycle_Count        0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       75
194 Temperature_Celsius     0x0022   026   040   000    Old_age   Always       -       26 (0 21 0 0)
195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered  0x001a   031   017   000    Old_age   Always       -       181165264
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0010   100   100   000    Old_age   Offline      -       0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count    0x003e   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
240 Head_Flying_Hours       0x0000   100   253   000    Old_age   Offline      -       19091129630976
241 Total_LBAs_Written      0x0000   100   253   000    Old_age   Offline      -       2913237044
242 Total_LBAs_Read         0x0000   100   253   000    Old_age   Offline      -       3694510915

 

ScreenShot2011-12-10at122039PM.png

 

ScreenShot2011-12-10at122021PM.png

Link to comment

I suppose that since you wrote and refreshed them, the were not weak sectors any longer (by the firmware's standards).

 

I would still suggest periodic smart tests.

Definitely a monthly parity check.

 

I might even institute monthly a badblocks readonly test.

The only problem with that is /dev/md0 does not exist without doing a manual mknod.

 

 

Link to comment

Other people have had that happen. There's no real explanation for it.

 

Peter

Actually, there is.

 

Before re-allocating a sector, the SMART firmware will attempt to write to the original sector and verify it can them be read from there.  If successful the original "write" was faulty and there is no need to re-allocate the sector.

 

If there are lots of sectors that are un-readable,  but can be successfully re-written, keep an eye on the drive.  It might indicate a bad drive, or bad voltage regulation from the power supply.

 

Good that it now works.

 

Was this a drive that had been  pre-cleared???  It would help if I read what you wrote.  I'd suspect it wrote the sectors improperly when it write the initial parity.

 

What power supply (specific make/model) and what number of green/non-green drives are you running??

 

Joe L.

Link to comment

Thats very curious.  I just replaced an Antec 650w PSU several months ago with a new OCZ 850w modular PSU.  I had a lot of drive issues and ended up RMA'ing drives and bought a new one to replace drives with a lot of errors including Pending Sectors.  Two of my new drives were ticking up re-allocated sectors - several every few days.  Once I changed out the Antec PSU for the new OCZ 850w PSU, all errors immediately stopped.  Haven't had a single issue with any of the eight drives in my server since.  Wonder if the Antec PSU has an issue?

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...