Jump to content

SanDisk USB failed, how do I find which disk is my parity disk?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I tried 2 separate computers and neither of them detect my SanDisk USB flash drive, looks like the thing is dead-dead.  So I got a temporary flash drive for now and loaded up a fresh copy of unraid on it.  When i log into the web ui, its asking me to assign my disks, but i'm not sure which exact drive is my parity disk.  

 

I tried to mount one them with this command but it didn't work

# mount -t reiserfs /dev/sdn /tmp/sdn
mount: /tmp/sdn: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdn, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
       dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.

 

Any tips to make sure I pick the correct parity drive?

Do i need my data drives to be in the exact same order? I would need this info also, would it be in a backup somewhere?

Edited by krodami
Link to comment

got it working

# mount /dev/sdn1 /tmp/sdn

 

So this is what i get from my parity drive

# mount /dev/sdr1 /tmp/sdr
mount: /tmp/sdr: mount(2) system call failed: Structure needs cleaning.
       dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.

 

So the second question is do i just assign the rest of my disks? Is there a way to avoid erasing and rebuilding my parity drive?

Link to comment
1 hour ago, krodami said:

Do i need my data drives to be in the exact same order?

 

Not as long as the parity disk(s) are correctly assigned, from what I gather.

 

The last time I had to replace a flash drive I took the opportunity to intentionally re-number the data disks into a more sensible order.

 

I can't find the article or post I read back then as reassurance so maybe don't take my anecdote at face value until someone weighs in with something more authoritative.

Link to comment
19 minutes ago, u.stu said:

 

Not as long as the parity disk(s) are correctly assigned, from what I gather.

 

The last time I had to replace a flash drive I took the opportunity to intentionally re-number the data disks into a more sensible order.

 

I can't find the article or post I read back then as reassurance so maybe don't take my anecdote at face value until someone weighs in with something more authoritative.

So when i first was assigning the drives it said it was going to erase the parity drive, so i started the array with just the data disks and started it without a the parity disk, I let that run for 10 minutes then shutdown the array, then when i went to add the parity drive I did not see the same warning message so i rolled the dice and started the array, its now doing a parity-sync, so i think we are on the right track.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...