March 4, 201214 yr Author Also, here is the current syslog There has to be something wrong. The smart reports say that the drives are all good syslog.zip
March 4, 201214 yr Also, here is the current syslog There has to be something wrong. The smart reports say that the drives are all good Please post a smart report for disk11 (I think it is /dev/sdm) Based on your syslog, that disk is experiencing UNC media-errors (un-correctable media errors) Those would show in the smart report as sectors pending re-allocation, or sectors already-re-allocated. ar 4 07:42:52 Tower kernel: ata14.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Mar 4 07:42:52 Tower kernel: ata14.00: BMDMA2 stat 0xd0009 Mar 4 07:42:52 Tower kernel: ata14.00: failed command: READ DMA EXT Mar 4 07:42:52 Tower kernel: ata14.00: cmd 25/00:90:7f:14:24/00:03:ad:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 466944 in Mar 4 07:42:52 Tower kernel: res 51/40:ff:0c:16:24/00:01:ad:00:00/f0 Emask 0x9 (media error) Mar 4 07:42:52 Tower kernel: ata14.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Mar 4 07:42:52 Tower kernel: ata14.00: error: { UNC } Mar 4 07:42:57 Tower kernel: ata14.00: configured for UDMA/33 Mar 4 07:42:57 Tower kernel: ata14: EH complete Mar 4 07:43:00 Tower kernel: ata14.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Mar 4 07:43:00 Tower kernel: ata14.00: BMDMA2 stat 0xd0009 Mar 4 07:43:00 Tower kernel: ata14.00: failed command: READ DMA EXT Mar 4 07:43:00 Tower kernel: ata14.00: cmd 25/00:90:7f:14:24/00:03:ad:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 466944 in Mar 4 07:43:00 Tower kernel: res 51/40:ff:0c:16:24/00:01:ad:00:00/f0 Emask 0x9 (media error) Mar 4 07:43:00 Tower kernel: ata14.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Mar 4 07:43:00 Tower kernel: ata14.00: error: { UNC } Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: ata14.00: configured for UDMA/33 Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: sd 14:0:0:0: [sdm] Unhandled sense code Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: sd 14:0:0:0: [sdm] Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08 Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: sd 14:0:0:0: [sdm] Sense Key : 0x3 [current] [descriptor] Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: Descriptor sense data with sense descriptors (in hex): Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: 72 03 11 04 00 00 00 0c 00 0a 80 00 00 00 00 00 Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: ad 24 16 0c Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: sd 14:0:0:0: [sdm] ASC=0x11 ASCQ=0x4 Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: sd 14:0:0:0: [sdm] CDB: cdb[0]=0x28: 28 00 ad 24 14 7f 00 03 90 00 Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdm, sector 2904823308 Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: ata14: EH complete Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: md: disk11 read error Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: handle_stripe read error: 2904823240/7, count: 1 Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: md: disk11 read error Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: handle_stripe read error: 2904823248/7, count: 1 Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: md: disk11 read error Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: handle_stripe read error: 2904823256/7, count: 1 Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: md: disk11 read error Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: handle_stripe read error: 2904823264/7, count: 1 Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: md: disk11 read error Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: handle_stripe read error: 2904823272/7, count: 1 Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: md: disk11 read error Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: handle_stripe read error: 2904823280/7, count: 1 Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: md: disk11 read error Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: handle_stripe read error: 2904823288/7, count: 1 Mar 4 07:43:05 Tower kernel: md: disk11 read error
March 4, 201214 yr Author Joe, Here is the smart report for disk11 I appreciate your help smart_report_disk11.txt
March 4, 201214 yr Joe, Here is the smart report for disk11 I appreciate your help That drive is dying, the sooner you can replace it the better.
March 4, 201214 yr What in the report tells you that? I am curious. Mostly the Reallocated Sector count and the Current Pending Sector count
March 4, 201214 yr What in the report tells you that? I am curious. There have been 64 sectors re-allocated as they were un-readable 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 192 192 140 Pre-fail Always - 64 and there are 1459 more un-readable sectors pending re-allocation when next written. 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 195 195 000 Old_age Always - 1459 As already described, that drive is rapidly dying... RMA ASAP. DO NOT PERFORM A PARITY CHECK... (in fact, best if you un-assign the drive now) Joe L.
March 5, 201214 yr Author Here are smart reports from all disks Please tell me what drives are failing. I know about disk11. Thanks smart_reports.zip
March 5, 201214 yr The other drives look ok. There are 2 failed drives and unRAID cannot recover the contents of these disks. You may be able to recover most of disk 11 using recovery software on a Mac or PC. Remove disk11 and reset the array to build new parity.
March 5, 201214 yr Author I ordered a new drive to replace disk11. Should be here this week disk11 is actually empty. It only has 2 folders on it, no data I will reset array when replaced and then rebuild parity.
March 5, 201214 yr You can reset and rebuild parity now. When the new disk comes pre-clear it and then add it to the array. Also, A Mac can only be used for reiserfs data recovery if Linux is installed.
March 5, 201214 yr Author I want to unassign disk11 and then start the array without it. There is nothing on disk11. How do I do this and still have parity be ok Then when I get the new drive I will remove the bad one and then preclear the new one and then assign it
March 5, 201214 yr Remove the drive and follow this procedure: OK so the rebuild finished but when I restarted the unraid system it said it was doing the rebuild again. Here is the current syslog. The rebuild gets to 98.9% and then seems to really slow down. I ran a smart report on all drives and they reported as fine. I have no idea what is going on. please help me get my tower back to normal. How can I tell unraid to just skip the rebuild process and leave the drive empty. There were only a few files on it anyway. Thanks Simple. Stop the array Un-assign the disk Set a new disk configuration (depending on unRAID version, either use the "initconfig" commanf or use the New Config button on the utilites page.) Start the array without the disk in the array. Parity is instantly invalidated when you set a new disk configuration. It will be calculated again when you next start the array.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.