February 27, 201214 yr I am using 4.7 I have attached a syslog. It seems to transfer very slow for some reason. My other 2 towers are fine. Anyone have any ideas why? Thanks syslog.txt
February 27, 201214 yr http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php?title=Troubleshooting#Obtaining_a_SMART_report
February 27, 201214 yr Author I will run it on /dev/sdk as soon as I get home tonight and post the results
February 28, 201214 yr Author I just replaced the drive and now it says Upgrade disk. I started the array and the drive has an orange dot and it says it is starting. It has been starting for 15 minutes or so. Is this normal?
February 28, 201214 yr Hard to read the picture - resolution is too low. However, did you preclear the drive before trying to add it to the array? If not, then unRaid will take a while (hours) to initialise the drive before it adds it into the array. So this *could* be normal, depending on what you did.
February 28, 201214 yr Author ah yes... I did not preclear it so that explains it. Oh well. I will wait
March 1, 201214 yr Author The web page does not seem to be loading for me so I cannot tell if the upgrade of the disk is done or not Is there a process I can check in putty? What should I do?
March 1, 201214 yr The web page does not seem to be loading for me so I cannot tell if the upgrade of the disk is done or not Is there a process I can check in putty? What should I do? tail -f /var/log/syslog In most releases, the progress is written to the system log depending on the size of the disk, the writing of zeros to it can take many hours, during which the array will not be accessible. Most disks write at a rate of between 65 and 100MB/s. At 100MB/s it will take 10 seconds to zero a Gigabyte. That is 6 GB per minute, and (assuming) with a 2TB drive you have 2000GB to zero. 2000/6 = 333.3 minutes, or 5.55 hours... Most drives cannot sustain writing 100MB/s on inner cylinders, so expect it to take 6 hours or more.
March 1, 201214 yr Author This is what I see Mar 1 12:18:36 Tower login[12498]: ROOT LOGIN on `pts/0' from `192.168.1.50' Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: BMDMA2 stat 0xd0009 Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: failed command: READ DMA EXT Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: cmd 25/00:00:9f:4f:02/00:04:ae:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 524288 in Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: res 51/40:7f:15:52:02/00:01:ae:00:00/f0 Emask 0x9 (media error) Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: error: { UNC } Mar 1 12:19:35 Tower kernel: ata14.00: configured for UDMA/100 Mar 1 12:19:35 Tower kernel: ata14: EH complete Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: ata14.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: ata14.00: BMDMA2 stat 0xd0009 Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: ata14.00: failed command: READ DMA EXT Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: ata14.00: cmd 25/00:00:9f:4f:02/00:04:ae:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 524288 in Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: res 51/40:7f:1d:52:02/00:01:ae:00:00/f0 Emask 0x9 (media error) Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: ata14.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: ata14.00: error: { UNC } Mar 1 12:19:51 Tower kernel: ata14.00: configured for UDMA/100 Mar 1 12:19:51 Tower kernel: ata14: EH complete
March 1, 201214 yr The web page does not seem to be loading for me so I cannot tell if the upgrade of the disk is done or not Is there a process I can check in putty? What should I do? tail -f /var/log/syslog In most releases, the progress is written to the system log depending on the size of the disk, the writing of zeros to it can take many hours, during which the array will not be accessible. I thought upgrading an existing disk just rebuilt the data from parity + rest of drives, expanded the partition if there was extra space, and zeroed the newly allocated portion. So it zeros the entire space first? I've always upgraded drives with precleared spares, so I don't know from experience.
March 1, 201214 yr This is what I see Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: failed command: READ DMA EXT Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: cmd 25/00:00:9f:4f:02/00:04:ae:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 524288 in Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: res 51/40:7f:15:52:02/00:01:ae:00:00/f0 Emask 0x9 (media error) Did you reconfigure anything physically when you replaced the bad drive? That message is telling me that you have another failed drive, but from that snippet I can't tell which one. If my sleuthing skills are good, it should be the drive that's plugged into port 4 of a controller. I think it might be a PCI 4 port card, I'm not good enough at reading syslogs to be confident about it though. In any case, I hope you have the contents of this server backed up elsewhere, because it's looking like a second drive failed while you were in the process of trying to rebuild the first failed drive. Are you sure you removed the correct drive to replace?
March 2, 201214 yr Author I did nto change anything. Just took out the bad drive and put in the new one for disk5 Then it has been rebuilding for the last couple of days. A parity check is scheduled to run on the first of the month. Do you think it is causing an issue? BTW, the rebuild is very slow... running at 40 KB/sec and sitting at 99.8%
March 2, 201214 yr This is what I see Mar 1 12:18:36 Tower login[12498]: ROOT LOGIN on `pts/0' from `192.168.1.50' Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: BMDMA2 stat 0xd0009 Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: failed command: READ DMA EXT Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: cmd 25/00:00:9f:4f:02/00:04:ae:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 524288 in Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: res 51/40:7f:15:52:02/00:01:ae:00:00/f0 Emask 0x9 (media error) Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Mar 1 12:19:29 Tower kernel: ata14.00: error: { UNC } Mar 1 12:19:35 Tower kernel: ata14.00: configured for UDMA/100 Mar 1 12:19:35 Tower kernel: ata14: EH complete Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: ata14.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: ata14.00: BMDMA2 stat 0xd0009 Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: ata14.00: failed command: READ DMA EXT Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: ata14.00: cmd 25/00:00:9f:4f:02/00:04:ae:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 524288 in Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: res 51/40:7f:1d:52:02/00:01:ae:00:00/f0 Emask 0x9 (media error) Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: ata14.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Mar 1 12:19:45 Tower kernel: ata14.00: error: { UNC } Mar 1 12:19:51 Tower kernel: ata14.00: configured for UDMA/100 Mar 1 12:19:51 Tower kernel: ata14: EH complete UNC + "media error" = uncorrectable read error. (unreadable sector... marked for possible re-allocation)
March 2, 201214 yr The rebuild will have errors and may totally fail. All of the other disks must be read successfully to perform a rebuild. Post a new syslog.
March 4, 201214 yr Author OK so the rebuild finished but when I restarted the unraid system it said it was doing the rebuild again. Here is the current syslog. The rebuild gets to 98.9% and then seems to really slow down. I ran a smart report on all drives and they reported as fine. I have no idea what is going on. please help me get my tower back to normal. How can I tell unraid to just skip the rebuild process and leave the drive empty. There were only a few files on it anyway. Thanks syslog.txt
March 4, 201214 yr OK so the rebuild finished but when I restarted the unraid system it said it was doing the rebuild again. Here is the current syslog. The rebuild gets to 98.9% and then seems to really slow down. I ran a smart report on all drives and they reported as fine. I have no idea what is going on. please help me get my tower back to normal. How can I tell unraid to just skip the rebuild process and leave the drive empty. There were only a few files on it anyway. Thanks Simple. Stop the array Un-assign the disk Set a new disk configuration (depending on unRAID version, either use the "initconfig" commanf or use the New Config button on the utilites page.) Start the array without the disk in the array. Parity is instantly invalidated when you set a new disk configuration. It will be calculated again when you next start the array.
March 4, 201214 yr Author Joe, The parity seems to build find up until near the last few %, then it really slows down to a crawl Here is a screenshot
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.