hurricanehrndz Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/hurricane/tinymediamanager/ PS it might still be building. Quote Link to comment
krakent3ch Posted November 10, 2014 Share Posted November 10, 2014 Thanks a ton. Works great Quote Link to comment
johnodon Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 Is there a guide that explains how to install containers from the registry? I have only used templates so far and I'm struggling. Hurricane...I saw your instructions on the registry. The thing that confused me was this: Download latest TinyMediaManager from here. Extract to a location such as /tmm on the host and ensure the directory and all files are by uid 99 and gid 100 (nobdy and users on unRAID). I'm comfortable with the docker run commande but can you elaborate on the above? How does this translate in the unRAID world? TIA! John Quote Link to comment
johnodon Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 NM...got it working. Thx for making this! John Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted November 11, 2014 Author Share Posted November 11, 2014 I will create a template shortly. I'm also updating the image from supervisor to circus, because I would like the boot process of the container to be more fail safe. Quote Link to comment
johnodon Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 Sounds like a plan. How do you like TMM? I have never sued it before. Previously I have used MCM and MC. How do you think this fairs? John Quote Link to comment
johnodon Posted November 11, 2014 Share Posted November 11, 2014 Quick question... Is there a trick to setting permissions on downloaded metadata? When I scrape a movie, I cannot modify/delete the files that were downloaded (from my laptop...WIN7). If I run New Permissions script, all is good and I can modify files. John Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted November 14, 2014 Author Share Posted November 14, 2014 Perhaps once I start using circus I can achieve this. In terms of tmm, I really like. It seems to be doing really well. I use it in conjunction with MediaBrowser. Quote Link to comment
johnodon Posted November 15, 2014 Share Posted November 15, 2014 FYI...found some weirdness. Not with the container but with TMM itself: http://forum.kodi.tv/showthread.php?tid=208933 John Quote Link to comment
dalben Posted January 11, 2015 Share Posted January 11, 2015 Is this container working ? I run TMM from my desktop but if I could trigger it via cron /command line running on my server that would be very cool Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted January 11, 2015 Author Share Posted January 11, 2015 Yes you can. Are you running the docker version or just the actual java install? If using docker with the new image https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/hurricane/tinymediamanager/ I would use docker exec -ti containername /scripts/tinyMediaManangerCMD.sh $PARMS replace containername with the name of your container and replace $PARMS with available options, please tinyMediaManager readme or forum for this info. Quote Link to comment
krakent3ch Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 How do i go about updating TMM. I see that a new version (2.6.5) has been released but there has been no notification on the docker so far. Thanks in advance Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted January 15, 2015 Author Share Posted January 15, 2015 I will update it shortly. Thanks for the post. If you wanted to do it manually docker exec would be the best, I will update the image though. unRAID best practice suggest all updating be done by developers and not the containers themselves. Quote Link to comment
krakent3ch Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 I will update it shortly. Thanks for the post. If you wanted to do it manually docker exec would be the best, I will update the image though. unRAID best practice suggest all updating be done by developers and not the containers themselves. Thank you Quote Link to comment
darkside40 Posted February 27, 2015 Share Posted February 27, 2015 Just as an info, v2.6.6 is out introduces trakt.tv 2.0 API. Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted April 15, 2015 Author Share Posted April 15, 2015 Thanks. I will update it soon. Quote Link to comment
krakent3ch Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I just updated to the latest version and it looks like something has gone wrong with the update. Cant seem to connect to the server. Failed to connect to server (code: 1006) EDIT: tried reinstalling the docker and the same issue persists but in the install screen i got this... IMAGE ID [53f858aaaf03]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -6575530100% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [837339b91538]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -7147900% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [615c102e2290]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -68000% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [b39b81afc8ca]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -3200% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [8254ff58b098]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -3200% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [ec5f59360a64]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -3200% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [2ce4ac388730]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -1105000% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [2eccda511755]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -3150900000% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [5a14c1498ff4]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -3200% of -0MB. Download complete. Is this normal? Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted April 24, 2015 Author Share Posted April 24, 2015 This might a docker error. I will double check it, maybe I have to recreate the repository from scratch since I made some major overhaul. Can you please retry again, and report back. Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted April 24, 2015 Author Share Posted April 24, 2015 I just updated to the latest version and it looks like something has gone wrong with the update. Cant seem to connect to the server. Failed to connect to server (code: 1006) EDIT: tried reinstalling the docker and the same issue persists but in the install screen i got this... IMAGE ID [53f858aaaf03]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -6575530100% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [837339b91538]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -7147900% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [615c102e2290]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -68000% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [b39b81afc8ca]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -3200% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [8254ff58b098]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -3200% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [ec5f59360a64]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -3200% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [2ce4ac388730]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -1105000% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [2eccda511755]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -3150900000% of -0MB. Download complete. IMAGE ID [5a14c1498ff4]: Pulling metadata. Pulling fs layer. Downloading -3200% of -0MB. Download complete. Is this normal? Thanks, The pulling layers is fine. I discovered the issue. The problem is I change to using the phusion base image like everyone else, unfortunately I forgot that phusion uses trusty and that the x11vnc release in trusty hates it when you disable ipv6. unRAID by default doesn't have ipv6 enabled for docker and so x11vnc errors out with a buffer overrun. Anyhow I'm trying to resolve the issue while keeping the base image phusion. I promise you I tested the build before the release the problem is that I tested it on a ubuntu virtual desktop were ipv6 is not disabled. So when I release it I thought that issues like this weren't going to happen. My apologies. Just to give you heads up the container also support rdp now, so that another method you might be able to access once I get the issues resolved. Please reply rather than editing your message so that I may get notified. I will try and have this fix as soon as possible. Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 i'm trying to get a video conferencing server in a docker, running and i'm hitting this ipv6 issue too. Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted April 24, 2015 Author Share Posted April 24, 2015 I know, luckily I remember what the issue was. I'm not sure why it only does it in unraid. My ubuntu machine only has ipv4 and the same error doesn't pop up. Maybe it's the way docker is compiled for unraid? Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I know, luckily I remember what the issue was. I'm not sure why it only does it in unraid. My ubuntu machine only has ipv4 and the same error doesn't pop up. i can run the docker in my docker server VM and it works nicely and i can videochat to myself thus far, lol. soon as i try it on my unraid box and it spits out some random errors specific to the app which google says is ipv6 related. Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I know, luckily I remember what the issue was. I'm not sure why it only does it in unraid. My ubuntu machine only has ipv4 and the same error doesn't pop up. Maybe it's the way docker is compiled for unraid? have to ask what the dependencies and configure was i guess ? Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted April 24, 2015 Author Share Posted April 24, 2015 We should really get to the bottom of this because it makes no sense not to have certain images work in unRAID while they work on almost every other issue. Could it be that the kernel in unRAID is not compiled with ipv6? Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted April 24, 2015 Author Share Posted April 24, 2015 Just checked the kerneel config and IPV6 is not set. Wonder if that's the issue. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.