sparklyballs Posted July 21, 2015 Author Share Posted July 21, 2015 Isengard went final within the last 15 minutes or so. running a test build to see if the patch still works, or whether i have to wait for an updated patch. Sparkly I had a thought. I might be the only one using the "feature" but I added a mapping for a UDP port 9777 to the ES service. It means I can add your headless container to Yatse and use my Android device to trigger a manual update if I need to. Worth adding to the template or too fringe a use case? freaky, i was talking to the linuxserver guys on irc and one of them wants a build with nothing disabled so they can use yatse and stream stuff to their android (ugh, rinses mouth) with it. Quote Link to comment
CHBMB Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 Isengard went final within the last 15 minutes or so. running a test build to see if the patch still works, or whether i have to wait for an updated patch. Sparkly I had a thought. I might be the only one using the "feature" but I added a mapping for a UDP port 9777 to the ES service. It means I can add your headless container to Yatse and use my Android device to trigger a manual update if I need to. Worth adding to the template or too fringe a use case? freaky, i was talking to the linuxserver guys on irc and one of them wants a build with nothing disabled so they can use yatse and stream stuff to their android (ugh, rinses mouth) with it. Android rules, iOS is for wimps Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted July 21, 2015 Author Share Posted July 21, 2015 Isengard went final within the last 15 minutes or so. running a test build to see if the patch still works, or whether i have to wait for an updated patch. Sparkly I had a thought. I might be the only one using the "feature" but I added a mapping for a UDP port 9777 to the ES service. It means I can add your headless container to Yatse and use my Android device to trigger a manual update if I need to. Worth adding to the template or too fringe a use case? freaky, i was talking to the linuxserver guys on irc and one of them wants a build with nothing disabled so they can use yatse and stream stuff to their android (ugh, rinses mouth) with it. Android rules, iOS is for wimps if you gauge your machismo by your phone, you have issues or no dial tone... Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted July 21, 2015 Author Share Posted July 21, 2015 Isengard went final within the last 15 minutes or so. running a test build to see if the patch still works, or whether i have to wait for an updated patch. Sparkly I had a thought. I might be the only one using the "feature" but I added a mapping for a UDP port 9777 to the ES service. It means I can add your headless container to Yatse and use my Android device to trigger a manual update if I need to. Worth adding to the template or too fringe a use case? the port has been in the expose command of the dockerfile since the beginning i think (either that or very early on someone asked for it, i can't remember) Quote Link to comment
CHBMB Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 Isengard went final within the last 15 minutes or so. running a test build to see if the patch still works, or whether i have to wait for an updated patch. Sparkly I had a thought. I might be the only one using the "feature" but I added a mapping for a UDP port 9777 to the ES service. It means I can add your headless container to Yatse and use my Android device to trigger a manual update if I need to. Worth adding to the template or too fringe a use case? the port has been in the expose command of the dockerfile since the beginning i think (either that or very early on someone asked for it, i can't remember) Yeah, just not in the template. Took me a while to work out as I was mapping it as TCP instead of UDP Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted July 21, 2015 Author Share Posted July 21, 2015 Isengard went final within the last 15 minutes or so. running a test build to see if the patch still works, or whether i have to wait for an updated patch. Sparkly I had a thought. I might be the only one using the "feature" but I added a mapping for a UDP port 9777 to the ES service. It means I can add your headless container to Yatse and use my Android device to trigger a manual update if I need to. Worth adding to the template or too fringe a use case? the port has been in the expose command of the dockerfile since the beginning i think (either that or very early on someone asked for it, i can't remember) Yeah, just not in the template. Took me a while to work out as I was mapping it as TCP instead of UDP patch didn't fail and the compile is continuing , a good sign normally. Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted July 22, 2015 Author Share Posted July 22, 2015 Bumped to 15.0 final. Quote Link to comment
CHBMB Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 Bumped to 15.0 final. Working great here. Thanks Sparkly Quote Link to comment
skank Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 Couple of questions 1. This is kodi isengard version right? Its a headless version? 2. Does this work with crossplatform kodi? so one kodi windows machine, one kodi android machine etc etc? 3. Do i need a cache drive? 4. Can the library also populate from nfo files? 5. when does it auto update? as soon as files are added? Cause i dont use couchpotato or sickbeard.. Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted August 19, 2015 Author Share Posted August 19, 2015 Couple of questions 1. This is kodi isengard version right? Its a headless version? 2. Does this work with crossplatform kodi? so one kodi windows machine, one kodi android machine etc etc? 3. Do i need a cache drive? 4. Can the library also populate from nfo files? 5. when does it auto update? as soon as files are added? Cause i dont use couchpotato or sickbeard.. 1. yes and yes 2. yes 3. no, but a cache is preferred in general for dockers 4. it can read nfo files 5. it doesn't autoupdate by default. there is a web interface of sorts (pretty useless) that can trigger updates or there is kodisend https://www.mankier.com/1/kodi-send Quote Link to comment
skank Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 Maybe its useful to let it autoupdate as soon as unraid is alive? For me it would be handy if autoupdates as soon as files are added to the server... isnt that possible? Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted August 19, 2015 Author Share Posted August 19, 2015 Maybe its useful to let it autoupdate as soon as unraid is alive? For me it would be handy if autoupdates as soon as files are added to the server... isnt that possible? not everybody wants that setting....... if your drives aren't ready for some reason and the library tries to update it can remove things from the library. Quote Link to comment
skank Posted August 19, 2015 Share Posted August 19, 2015 sorry for my questions, but whats difference between mariadb and mysqldb? Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted August 19, 2015 Author Share Posted August 19, 2015 sorry for my questions, but whats difference between mariadb and mysqldb? for day to day operation not a lot, if anything. both are suitable for kodi setup. Quote Link to comment
steini84 Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 I have many dockers installed, but when I try to install this one nothing happens. I put in all the settings but there is nothing happening when I press create. Nothing in syslog and nothing on screen. Any idea where to start debugging ? Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted August 20, 2015 Author Share Posted August 20, 2015 I have many dockers installed, but when I try to install this one nothing happens. I put in all the settings but there is nothing happening when I press create. Nothing in syslog and nothing on screen. Any idea where to start debugging ? toggle advanced and fill in the variables there. Quote Link to comment
steini84 Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 That was it. Thanks! Quote Link to comment
skank Posted August 27, 2015 Share Posted August 27, 2015 Not to start a war between both but which way is better? This kodi isengard headless version with mysql or emby server and kodi plugin https://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=41207.0 Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted August 27, 2015 Author Share Posted August 27, 2015 Not to start a war between both but which way is better? This kodi isengard headless version with mysql or emby server and kodi plugin https://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=41207.0 better is subjective at best.......... Quote Link to comment
skank Posted August 27, 2015 Share Posted August 27, 2015 Not to start a war between both but which way is better? This kodi isengard headless version with mysql or emby server and kodi plugin https://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=41207.0 better is subjective at best.......... thats not an answer lol Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted August 27, 2015 Author Share Posted August 27, 2015 Not to start a war between both but which way is better? This kodi isengard headless version with mysql or emby server and kodi plugin https://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=41207.0 better is subjective at best.......... thats not an answer lol it is absolutely an answer to the question. if an app A does what i want then in my opinion its better than another app B that doesn't if app B does what you want and app A doesn't , then app B in your opinion is better. better is subjective. Quote Link to comment
skank Posted August 27, 2015 Share Posted August 27, 2015 Not to start a war between both but which way is better? This kodi isengard headless version with mysql or emby server and kodi plugin https://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=41207.0 better is subjective at best.......... thats not an answer lol it is absolutely an answer to the question. if an app A does what i want then in my opinion its better than another app B that doesn't if app B does what you want and app A doesn't , then app B in your opinion is better. better is subjective. But not if "does what i want" is both the same... It both does the same no? Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted August 27, 2015 Author Share Posted August 27, 2015 Not to start a war between both but which way is better? This kodi isengard headless version with mysql or emby server and kodi plugin https://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=41207.0 better is subjective at best.......... thats not an answer lol it is absolutely an answer to the question. if an app A does what i want then in my opinion its better than another app B that doesn't if app B does what you want and app A doesn't , then app B in your opinion is better. better is subjective. But not if "does what i want" is both the same... It both does the same no? better would still be subjective. Quote Link to comment
skank Posted August 27, 2015 Share Posted August 27, 2015 well can you say which are both pros and cons of both? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.