June 29, 20179 yr I've always used the white theme, but I noticed that there are a couple new ones. They look great, for the most part, and the animations look quite nice. There appears to be some text sizing issues, but nothing too bad. My question is about the original themes, in particular. I attached a picture to better help me describe what I'm seeing. This looks really awful. The information used to be condensed, now it's spread out to the width of the browser window. It's actually far harder to read this on a large screen than it used to be. All the pages are like this - a lot harder to read, and obtain useful information at a glance. Is it possible to get some settings for width? Or can I adjust it manually? I never thought the theme was pretty, but it was always functional. Now it's far less so, on a large screen. I suppose on mobile it would be fantastic.
June 29, 20179 yr +1 Rather than a setting that forces us to specify a fixed width that may not work in all situations, I would prefer either a setting that allows us to choose whether or not the information is condensed, or just make it always condensed and no setting. Google News just did this to us this week. I'm sure it looks great on a phone, but on my wide screen, high resolution monitor, it is just a bunch of whitespace.
June 30, 20179 yr 4 hours ago, limetech said: This is fixed in the next release. great news, thanks for the info
June 30, 20179 yr hopefully not only max width, but also centered (so your head is not slanted to the left)
July 30, 20178 yr Apparently it's not fixed. Only Statistics section in the Dashboard is thinner, all the rest of the webGui is still taking up the whole 3440 pixel width of my screen, making browsing the webGui very annoying.
July 30, 20178 yr Author I agree, although I have a feeling that was intentional. It's still really ugly, guys. Please address.
September 3, 20178 yr @limetech Ok, in the latest update it's better, but I think 1920px width is still too high. I found 1200px to be the sweet spot.
September 3, 20178 yr 5 minutes ago, Krzaku said: but I think 1920px width is still too high. I found 1200px to be the sweet spot. You can make the display window smaller, GUI will auto adjust between 1080 and 1920 pixels.
September 3, 20178 yr I can, but honestly, who resizes their browser window. We all just maximize it, am I right? I added a patch to /boot/config/go that changes the max-width in the css file to 1200px and that works for me. But I think anyone who uses an ultra wide monitor will agree with me that 1200px (or thereabouts) should be the default. We may have super wide monitors, but it's no fun to move your head around so much.
September 3, 20178 yr Everyone his preferences. I have a WQHD monitor (2560 pixels wide) and find 1920 a perfect match.
September 3, 20178 yr May i ask where to adjust ? Also have 2560 and still pretty full width here.Gesendet von meinem SM-G950F mit Tapatalk
September 3, 20178 yr 5 minutes ago, alturismo said: May i ask where to adjust ? Also have 2560 and still pretty full width here. Gesendet von meinem SM-G950F mit Tapatalk rc8q will use a maximum width of 1920px. Are you still on rc7a ? Also check your scaling. If set higher than 100% it will fill the screen more... Edited September 3, 20178 yr by bonienl
September 3, 20178 yr Urgs, scaling ... Forgot that ... My fault, sorry [emoji41]Gesendet von meinem SM-G950F mit Tapatalk
September 3, 20178 yr 33 minutes ago, bonienl said: Everyone his preferences. I have a WQHD monitor (2560 pixels wide) and find 1920 a perfect match. Like I said, it's more important for users of UW monitors. 16:9 monitors (which WQHD is) usually don't have 35 inch screen sizes, while for UW monitors it's something normal.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.