Jump to content

Smart status errors?


skank

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have 2 disks with smart status reports:

 

- disk 1 says: current pending sector 196 click for context menu

- disk 4 says current pending sector 88, offline uncorrectable 8 click for context menu

 

what does it mean?

Posted

Disk 4's report shows that it failed the test with a read error. You need to replace it. Disk 1 passed the test and might be reliable enough to allow you to rebuild disk 4, assuming you have single parity. Disk 4's (sorry, I meant disk 1's) SMART report would give some indication of its health. If you have dual parity then you can rebuild disk4 without needing disk1 to be readable. In fact, with dual parity I would simply replace both disks 1 and 4.

 

Posted
Quote

SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
Num  Test_Description    Status                  Remaining  LifeTime(hours)  LBA_of_first_error
# 1  Extended offline    Completed: read failure       90%      8903         3487182761

 

Posted
30 minutes ago, skank said:

i did qdd disk 4 smart report

 

Yes, sorry. I meant you should post disk 1's latest SMART report. I've updated my original post. Also confirm whether you have single or dual parity. In fact, post your diagnostics zip then we won't have to guess.

Posted
1 minute ago, skank said:

lol yes you said that

but what to do with it then

garbage?

If you have someone you are not fond of and wish to cause them grief you could give it to them.

Using it will cause data loss, sooner rather than later.

Take it apart and play with the strong magnets, they can be quite fun (and painful if not careful)

Posted
1 minute ago, jonathanm said:

If you have someone you are not fond of and wish to cause them grief you could give it to them.

Using it will cause data loss, sooner rather than later.

Take it apart and play with the strong magnets, they can be quite fun (and painful if not careful)

lol k

Posted
10 minutes ago, skank said:

or wait till it completely crashes?

No. Any disk with problems puts data at risk since all bits on all other disks must be reliable in order to rebuild a disk. Parity alone cannot reconstruct data without all other disks.

 

You really need to be working toward replacing both disks sooner rather than later.

 

Disk 1 already makes rebuild of disk4 uncertain, and vice versa.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...