fiR3W4LL

I have an issue with managing Docker. It seems it's not starting correctly. I'm encountering this error: "Error: failed reading provided config file: /etc/netbird/management.json: read /etc/netbird/management.json: is a directory." I haven't made any changes. Any ideas?

Hi @Landermark I have a custom bridge in the DMZ so yes im Bridgeing Do you maybe have changed in the Settings? Did you try it from scratch? Regards

Hi @Landermark Do you have changed something? i created a Server right now and it works whitout problems. Regards

I'll check that myself. Not realy sure about that. Some of the Mods where not working for me to, wasnt a big deal for me, they where more esthetic I'll try to find this out. I did not have this Problem. Maybe you changed the Permission folder in the Appdata/SpaceEngineers? Regards

Hi @King Issei Could you please send me the error message? Log? Thank You

Could you be more specific? Is the Server not running at all or just your friend cant connect? Regards

Hi @Landermark Did you try it without the GPU? i Just changed back to unraid and just setting the things up..... Next things are Space and Empi Server again. But the last time i did this, it was working without GPU. Why are you trying to get it work with the GPU? It does not need one Regards

I understand your concerns. Over the past few weeks, I've migrated all three of my systems from Proxmox back to UnRAID. Although I already had licenses, I had to replace the sticks. Then the relevant information came out. From my experience, Proxmox offers many possibilities, including backup. However, it requires a considerable amount of time. Therefore, I ultimately opted for the convenience of switching back to UnRAID. None of the systems are as straightforward to manage as UnRAID. While you could run MergeFS and Snapraid on OMV, which I've done and works well, you'd have another system to manage aside from Proxmox, and updating the LXCs and their respective containers takes a lot of time. Not to mention if the SMB connections don't work correctly or if errors occur over time. Additionally, not all systems have as clear a GUI as UnRAID. But for now, we're just speculating. We'll have to wait and see. Even for me, it's not easy to consider another change after a weekend of migrating from Proxmox to UnRAID. However, even if the price for a lifetime license is overly high, I'll still consider purchasing it. It shouldn't be too long now; I'm also eagerly awaiting the relevant information.

Are there any? DonT think so. No NAS OS is like UnRAID. My System does not consume much Power due to spinndown of the HDDs and has that easy Interface for Docker.

If that would be true, i think no one will not be upset to pay this. But we have to w8 on the official statement. I don’t think it will be long before we get it. The information is out, and many users on Reddit are upset, so the tension is rising.

I think that's correct from the company's point of view. Currently, the purchase of the software is based on a one-off payment and somehow perhaps you’ve reached a juncture where one-time payments are no longer sufficient.. That's why I see the step with a kind of subscription model as the right way. But you just can't forget the users who have been with us for a long time. It's possible that some of them might jump ship if the price is too high or simply out of principle. As B1scu1T describes it: Unraid is only what it is thanks to the community. If the community turns away because of the price and model then it can quickly go down the drain.

"I think it will be interesting to see what kind of pricing these will have (‘Starter’, ‘Unleashed’, ‘Lifetime’) and what it will be for those who bought basic, plus, or pro licenses for their servers in the past. Thinking about the community. I switched back to Unraid because it's just easy to use and requires less administration than Proxmox. I don't know if I'm willing to switch back now because of this. I think it depends on the pricing."

Hoi DataCollector Besten Dank für deine Zeit und Antwort. Ich habe zuerst denn Array erstellt, die Daten über LuckyBackup vom 2. Server kopieren lassen und danach die Parity Festplatte hinzugefügt. „Ich mag mich von früher erinnern, dass diese Variante denn vollen Speed ausschöpft, um Daten von 2 Server zu syncen.“ Wo kann ich den reconstruct write forcieren? Und würde dies nun bei laufendem Sync auch funktionieren? Meine Hauptsystem konnten damals auch fast permanent mit fullspeed syncen, dies dennoch über 24H, 16TB Platten.

Hoi Zusammen nun bin ich doch wiedermal hier unterwegs. Lang langer Pause hab ich mich entschieden auf UnRAID zu setzen. Es ist hald um einiges einfacher ich habe einen kleinen Server für backups erstellt. 1x 10TB als Parity Seagate Ironwolf und 2x 8TB als Pool. Soweit funktioniert alles wie immer. Nun habe ich den Sync gestartet damit die Daten auf die Parity übertragen wird, aber erreiche nur die im Bild angezeigte gewchwindigkeit: ich weiss dass alle 3 Festplatten 250mbs erreichen können. Darum frage ich mich, warum kastrieren sie sich auf 100mbs? was habe ich verpasst? Besten dank für eure Rückmeldung

It's been a while since I had Unraid as a server. I keep looking back and sometimes miss the simplicity of it. The advantage of Proxmox is that the VMs and LXCs automatically take over the IP from Opnsense. Now I wanted to ask, do the containers now also get the iPs from the DHCP server or is everything still entered manually? Kind regards