Niellles
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Niellles
-
Hi guys, I am trying to get a new PCI-e NIC to work. No luck so far, and honestly I think the card may be a bust. I've attached a diagnostics file, where you can see that the NIC doesn't show up as a PCI-e device. The NIC is a 2.5Gb Delock 89564 Realtek RTL8125B inside), which based on the chip, should work with version of Unraid. I've tried: 2.0 x1 as well as 3.0 x16 slots. Tried with my on board NIC unplugged. Tried with the 2.5Gb NIC plugged in to a switch and not plugged in at all. Tried NIC in another PC (will give this a shot tomorrow). So one interesting (i.e. scary) thing that happened; first time I booted with the new NIC (not plugged in), Unraid booted correctly. I then plugged in a cable that's directly attached to another machine (not turned on at the time). The onboard NIC somehow went down, or Unraid crashed (was getting connection refused on the GUI). I've not yet been able to create this behavior again. Any ideas? After a bit more reading, found out that other people are having tons of issues with drivers for similar cards. However, they at least have their card detected. themachine-diagnostics-20221219-2247.zip
-
I am doing a parity swap: replacing my old 3TB parity drive with a 4TB drive and replacing one of my data drives with the former parity drive. Currently all my parity data is being copied from the old drive to the new one and the following read/write speeds are being reported: The reported speeds seem to be stuck at the values shown in the screenshot. The progress on the copy is about 1% every 5 minutes. I am not sure whether this is 1% of 3TB or 1% of 4TB. However the progress that I am seeing equates to roughly 100 Mb/s, which corresponds to speeds I am used to during parity checks. I am assuming that the speeds shown are actually the speeds of the disks before I started the swap procedure (when my array was idling). It would be more helpful if a) the correct speeds were shown or b) no speeds were shown (no speeds beats incorrect speeds IMO).
-
I'll try to contribute some translations. I've now done two small files and will probably do some more in the coming weeks. Would you like them all as one big pull request or should I submit them as I go. (The first might cause a situation where others do translations that I've already stored locally.) Unfortunately I won't be able to test my translations (at the moment), since I only have my main server running on 6.8.3. I might try to setup a test server in VMWare, but that would have to run inside of an Unraid VM. What could go possibly go wrong? I reckon this won't be too much of a problem since @SpencerJ and @bonienl will still be reviewing the PR's. I'll also be reviewing the translations that've already been done. I'd like to suggest an alternative translation for 'Share' which is now translated as Map. Netwerkschijf or Netwerkmap seems more appropriate and maybe even keeping it as 'Share' would also be an option. Should I file a GitHub issue for this?
