mrdavvv

Man i delayed deploying Vorta for like a full year, and now that im up an ready to do it, the image its not longer available!. Ill try installing it without it, hope it works!

Im suspicious of my USB, i bought it trough Amazon (First mistake), and in both Unraid / Ubuntu shows with no ID / Vendor: What do you think guys?, seems legit?, better to send it back?.

This a capture from my file: nano /mnt/user/appdata/nextcloud/nginx/site-confs/default.conf

Solution: Aparently the Nextcloud LSIO image uses this addres for nginx config's: nano /mnt/user/appdata/nextcloud/nginx/site-confs/default.conf Instead of: nano /mnt/user/appdata/nextcloud/nginx/nginx.conf So just adjusted this line in the former and it worked: # 04-11-2022_Increase client_max_body_size, original 512MB. client_max_body_size 16G; After restarting the instance, NX keep insisting on the 413 error. I tried renaming the files, as it has worked for me before. After renaming some files, NX just "unfreezed" and starting uploading my big files. Finally!

Performance Downgrade with docker | What could it be?. Before i was running a LXC Container in Proxmox (Ubuntu 20.04), with 2 Cores available: Average around 40 - 50% And this is the CPU load with docker, in the same 2 cores: (Not running other Docker / VM's at the moment) Average 70 - 98% The setup of Xeoma and load its exactly the same, as the number of cameras and configurations didnt change (Using the export setup method). So.... i find it estrange, i was expecting some changes, but considering that both are running the same APP, in a simillar linux kernel, so having double the load can be right... right? This seems normal?, where should i start to look? Docker has higher overhead than a lxc container?, if so, this much? Can i do something other than upgrading my CPU? Greetings!

My 2TB 5200RPM Drive its having a long death, so time to find its replacement. Im running a Xeoma Docker instance, connected to around 16 IP Cameras, Resolution 4MP, all H265, each has a data load of around 500 - 2MB/s with my current settings, so a total for all the cameras 30 - 40MB/s. My current WD Golds data transfer average its 180MB/s, so that means a 7200RPM drive can handle a lot of cameras (64 Cameras)... Im thinking my numbers are probably way off. But well, the latest Seagate 2TB its having a premature death, so maybe this setup its a little hard on the HDD's.... or not?. Would it be better to setup an small 512 / 1TB SSD as a cache of the recordings?, and then send each day to the HDD?. Not sure if a lot of writes are better handled with a Enterprise SSD, or a spinnning one. -- Are the CCTV Drives any different?. Current Setup: 2TB Seagate, Single Pool Device, BTFRS partition. Requirements: No need to have parity on this data. Try to not kill the HDD / SSD too fast. Able to handle future expansion, maybe 20 - 30 cameras in total Thanks!

Hello guys! Im having a lot of trouble with the syncing of big archives in Nextcloud. It seems like its a common problem, but i have tried a lot of proposed solutions in the web, with no avail. Setup: Unraid 6.11.1 Nextcloud Server: Latest LSIO Docker V25, Maria DB LSIO Container. Nextcloud Client: Latest APPImage 3.6.1 (Kubuntu Linux 20.04) Problem: Nextcloud client in desktop gives the error " 413 Request entity too large", in all my files bigger than around 500MB. Web client / Android with no issues. Attempted Solutions: nano /mnt/user/appdata/nextcloud/nginx/nginx.conf # Original: client_max_body_size 0; #Test 1: client_max_body_size 16G; #Test 2: client_max_body_size 16G; client_body_buffer_size 400m; nano nano /mnt/user/appdata/nextcloud/php/php-local.ini post_max_size = 10G upload_max_filesize = 10G post_max_size = 10G max_input_time = 3600 max_execution_time = 3600 memory_limit = 1024M Restarting the docker service between al the testing. appreciate any help!

Hello. So yesterday i did my first install of Unraid, everything did go very smooth!. Im wondering if my setup for the "out of array" data its correct. Im running the latest 6.9 RC2. The out of array data consist of temporal downloads, cctv recordings, and others. I see 3 methods: Create a pool device with the HDD. In the share settings, select this drive as the cache pool, and use cache pool as "only" (If i dont want the data to overflow to the array in case of the HDD filling up). Its clean. Can do BTRFS raid if needed in the future. Other advantages of using Btrfs? Create a disk share with this specific drive that its out of the array. Use unassigned devices plugin. (I think this method will become deprecated with 6.9v? I ended up going for option 1. But im still in time to change it. What do you think?:

Thanks a lot Energen!. This weekend i did the jump and now im running Unraid, with your repply i was more confident with my data transfers, and it was easier than i expected. Good day!

So the time finaly has arrive, im moving my server from Proxmox to Unraid this weekend!. Ive read some other post about the same subject an read the whole documentation..., but just wanted to double check if my suppositions are correct: Situation: - Old server has a 8TB drive with around 5Tb of data (Mostly videos and music). - Bought 3 x 8Tb drives for unraid... so with the old one, i will be having 4x8TB + a couple of SSD's for caching. The plan: Remove my old 8TB, just in case. Boot Unraid, and start the array without the parity drive, so i would only have 2 x8TB. Turn off the machine, and plug the old data drive. Boot again, install the "Unnasigned devices" plugin, and mount the old drive. Use MC or Kruzader to move files from /mnt/olddisk to /mnt/specific-user-share Check if the transfer was succesfull, then format the old drive and make it part of the array. Assing parity drive, and its ready!. The questions: Its my method correct?, any recomendation? I should transfer directly to the user share right?... so Unraid can decide how to distribute the files according to the allocation method settings?. I think its a bad idea to transfer from disk to disk (/mnt/olddisk --> /mnt/disk1) I want to update to 6.9... should before doing anything to the server?, or maybe after file transfers?, it doesn't matter? Should i enable the cache drive for this operation?... i think at the end is the same as i will be limited to the final disk speed. Thanks!

Hello @itimpi. Thanks for the feedback, i also like option #3..... and as you mention, it would be better to use nvme for the virtualization, however, that would mean that i cannot do a raid 1, or do one that isn't that effective.... Probably my best option would be to get a better mobo with a second PCI or double m.2 ports... For the time, im probably sticking with single SSD (Cache) + single NVME drive (Virtualization). And just update in the future.

I'm still in the process of getting everything ready for my new Unraid server. With the new drive pools function, i was thinking about what could be the best setup for a cache and virtualization data drive, that would have: Docker and VM data Maybe plex metadata Cache for filesystem. Option 1 Single 500GB SSD - No redundancy, but can backup docker / VM data with a plugin. - Cheap n easy. What lifetime can i expect of an SSD with this task, ive read studies about how they can hold moving TB's of data for years, and all depends of your use case.... not sure if the probability of failure its too high in this case. Option 2 2x500GB SSD Raid 1 - Redundancy thanks to raid1. - Should be fast enough for all task's with a good nvme (3500mb/s)? The only problem its that my Mobo (Asus B350) only has 1 slot for NVME, and no free PCI slots (The single x16 ones its used by a HBA card). So i would need to stick with a regular sata SSD for the second drive. If i have a 3500mb/s nvme in slot1, and a 500mb/s sata in slot 2, my write speeds would be limited all the time for the max speed of the sata drive?, or only while specifically writing / reading at that drive?, would be this problematic for raid 1? Option 3 (I think the best). - 1 x 500GB Nvme for cache duties - 1 x 500GB SSD for docker's, VM's and plex metadata. Backup with plugin, or maybe do a raid1 with a couple of SSD's. Or any other option that you recommend?. As i mention im limited to only 1x Nvme, and no PCi slots. Maybe i should update my MOBO to have the option of Raid1 with 2 x Nvme's?. (Not sure if there is any micro ATX Am4 boards that can do this). Thanks a lot for your time! System: - 4 x 8tb Spinning. + 1 unasigned 2TB (For cctv recordings) + 1 unasigned 2TB (For downloads) - AM4 B350m with a 2400G Ryzen. (One 1 x m2 slot, one x16PCIe, 2 x PCI x1. - Node 804 case Usage: - Plex for max 2 concurrent users. (With the usual plex stack, downloaders, sonnarr, lidarr, etc). - NAS for 2 / 3 users, light load. - CCTV with xeoma - Some experimental dockers, nothing heavy. - Win10 VM for office ussage.

Thanks Jorge, yeah its an IT card so with your confirmation im more confident. The model its a LSI 9207-8i wich comes on IT by default, cheap and PCI 3.0

Hello!. Im in the process of upgrading my server, currently running Proxmox but im changing it to Unraid very soon. Running out of ports on my motherboard, so i just purchased a nice HP H220 HBA to get 8 X Sata's, the question is..... can i do my Unraid installation and use my current drives (Connected to Mobo), and when the time comes, change all the drives to the HBA without getting into trouble?. As the HBA its in IT mode, its supposed to work transparently, for the OS its the same drive, but i don't want to find that for some weird reason the SO doesn't see the drives as the same unit and something fails. How Unraid identify the drives?, UUID?, HD serial?. Thanks a lot for the help, im exited to start testing Unraid and be part of this great community!