-
INTERMITTENT SMB ISSUES AFTER 6.10.2 UPGRADE
I am having the same problem as unable to join an active dir domain. This was working fine until i has restore the virtual machine running AD with a backup. the util shows the correct info for reaching AD. All my desktops were able to rejoin the domain and can see each other. root@Tower:~# net ads info LDAP server: 192.168.0.4 LDAP server name: closet.pimmmmmer.local Workgroup: PIMmmmMER0 Realm: PIMmmmMER.LOCAL Bind Path: dc=PIMmmmMER,dc=LOCAL LDAP port: 389 Server time: Fri, 02 May 2025 18:45:18 PDT KDC server: 192.168.0.4 Server time offset: 0 Last machine account password change: Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 PST [global] domain master = no preferred master = no local master = no idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 1000-7999 idmap config PIMMER0 : backend = rid idmap config PIMMER0 : range = 10000-4000000000 added to extra config I am not sure what else to try Thanks , john
-
one array disk failed want to replace with parity and use larger new party disk
There were loose cables for power to the top drive cage. I corrected that and have started a rebuild. Power issues cause strange problems with file system errors that i had not seen before. I did not even touch these recently.
-
one array disk failed want to replace with parity and use larger new party disk
the log was full. It finished but needed to be run a second time to complete. The disk is still showing disabled tower-diagnostics-20220926-0652.zip
-
one array disk failed want to replace with parity and use larger new party disk
New problem when doing a xfsrepair the log get full and it stops Metadata corruption detected at 0x44e910, xfs_bmbt block 0x28d2ea458/0x1000 libxfs_bwrite: write verifier failed on xfs_bmbt bno 0x28d2ea458/0x8 Metadata corruption detected at 0x44e910, xfs_bmbt block 0x28d079b50/0x1000 libxfs_bwrite: write verifier failed on xfs_bmbt bno 0x28d079b50/0x8 Maximum metadata LSN (1095979799:38281785) is ahead of log (1:2). Format log to cycle 1095979802 How do i go forward from here?
-
one array disk failed want to replace with parity and use larger new party disk
New problem with the replacement of drives. The copy was successful but drive 2 which was not involved in the procedure shows wrong or no file system. The system is rebuilding but 500k bytes a second. What do i do next ? tower-diagnostics-20220925-0747.zip
-
one array disk failed want to replace with parity and use larger new party disk
One part of the instructions is missing or i missed it. Do not shutdown after the copy phase and before the rebuild disk part I did that and i forgot or did not remember the copy phase. So i have to do the copy phase again ( 14 hours) on a 10 TB disk. I moved the drives physically in the system after the copy part.
-
one array disk failed want to replace with parity and use larger new party disk
This procedure looks safe as parity is maintained the whole time (the reason for the copy). just time consuming. The array will be offline for the copy process. So a 10 tb replaced 6 tb party then then 6tb party replaces dead drive on second step on basic rebuilt drive operation.
-
one array disk failed want to replace with parity and use larger new party disk
Thank you for your help That was the link i was looking for but could not find. I looked at the smart diag on the drives page and it has many sectors that are pending and unable to then the disk was disable on a unable to read error.
-
one array disk failed want to replace with parity and use larger new party disk
I have a unraid box with 6.9 running with 2 6tb parity drives and 9 6 or 4 tb array drives. One of the 4 tb drives failed and is disabled with many read failures. I bought 10 TB drive to replace one of the parity drives then move it to the dead array drive. What is the safest way of doing this ? Can they be done at the same and is that safer than : Moving the parity drive to replace the array drive and rebuild Then install new party drive . John
-
One drive failed , then one party drive dropped out, then another dropped out
I redid all the power and sata wiring making sure that each 5in3 3in2 gets power from 2 different home cables. found one questionable port/cable changed to one on the marvel controllers. disk 3 is happy and is rebuilding disk 2 and party 1, at about 95 meg bytes per sec. That slower than normal but assume it is because one party and one disk needs building and the disk is need to generated before the party can be calculated.
-
One drive failed , then one party drive dropped out, then another dropped out
Is this a decent replacement card for the controllers ? https://www.newegg.com/p/17Z-010M-00012
-
One drive failed , then one party drive dropped out, then another dropped out
Not in the system as I am copying it to another disk. I tried rebuilding party with out but 3 dropped
-
One drive failed , then one party drive dropped out, then another dropped out
It is still running when drive 3 dropped out. tower-diagnostics-20210910-1019.zip
-
One drive failed , then one party drive dropped out, then another dropped out
How do i get the system back up with disk 3 as told it is good and disk 2 as well ? So far i have copied most of the data off of it with no trouble.
-
One drive failed , then one party drive dropped out, then another dropped out
When drives stopped working the drive light was stuck on, I also tried reseating the drives and removed from the array and restarted and re-added. After doing that disk 2 had real issues in writing. It would go slow then stop then back to med speed. I later tried to just rebuild party 1 and was building fast 140 MBs then disk 3 dropped off. I am copying data off disk 2 now to a Linux machine and so far so good
jpimlott
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited