AKC Server

Members
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AKC Server

  1. 21 hours ago, EDACerton said:

    An off switch does not currently exist, I’ll look at adding one. 

    +1 for this. Would be nice to quickly turn off & on the node, since I don't need this up all the time. Will be just that little extra bit of security. FYI I do realize I could just logout in the interim.

     

    Thanks for making & maintaining this plugin BTW!

  2. On 4/30/2023 at 3:14 PM, mplogas said:

     

    LiquidCTL can read the sensors attached to the control unit, but it seems it's not possible to read other sensors (e.g. cpu, mainboard or hdds). 

     

    Is your Commander XT actually a Core XT? This unit allows up to two temp sensors, you could place them very close to your HDDs. It's what I did with my Commander Pro and it works quite reliable.  

    Yes. Commander Core XT is the official name. I just shortened as XT was the key differentiator... No I get it. I have the 2 temp probes setup but the accuracy is not as finite as I'd like. For example the probe near/touching my HDDs shelf reads 29c white the other near the back of the case reads 26c while SMART reads 35c on the drives itself.

     

    This is why I was curious if you've come up with a way to use userscripts to send script chnages to the docker config file based on Unraid system parameters. Seems might not be possible at the moment I guess

  3. thanks for this great plugin to get fan control and other sensor for my Supermicro H12. Question, the fan control area is grouping only fans 1-4 and then FANA. This doesn't work well for my board as I have 7 Fan headers. 1-5 and then FANA & FANB. Is it possible to break these out all into their own control? To get even more granular it would be great if we could also choose the sensor which affects which group (ie CPU for CPU fans).

     

    Maybe I overlooked it. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

  4. @bonienl Thanks for your work on these plugins. Have been a great help!

     

    Curious. Would it be possible to incorporate the liquidctl drivers into your System Auto Fan. Would add some great fan control hardware abilities. For example, Corsair Commander Pro is native but The Commander Core XT is not and doesn't show in the plugin. This is the successor to the Pro (as that's been discontinued), and it's available through their drivers. There's a couple ported dockers for it, but the problem is these will only allow temperature rules from the included probes or manual percentage setting vs lie your native plugin which takes readings from the drives and applies rules/curves based on them.

     

    Just a thought/feature request. Not sure how hard it'd be to implement. Thanks!

  5. Thanks @mplogas for creating this container. I wonder, is there a way to script this to get temperatures from the hard drives themselves from unraid?

     

    I have the Commander XT which I've found out is not native to unraid (vs the pro) and can't be controlled by dynamix fan auto control. Therefore your plugin has been a great workaround, but the temperature sensors aren't the most accurate to how hot the actual drives are getting.

     

    Thoughts?

  6. On 1/10/2023 at 5:20 PM, limetech said:

    ... Finally, a future release will permit adding hot spares and special vdev's such as L2ARC, LOG, etc. and draid support.

     

    @limetech You mention that a future update will allow adding special vdev's from the Unraid GUI ZFS solution, but will this mean on 6.12 release pools which have special vdev's (ie Metadata) won't import into the official implementation? Or they'll import fine, but you just can't create them though the GUI?

     

    Thanks for all that your doing on this btw!

  7. Hey @ljm42,

     

    Thanks for all the work you do on your plugin! 10 seconds per and 50s overall is not a big delay, so thanks for fixing. Only thing is, I'm still seeing 30s in the logs on version 2022.11.02.0859. Do you know why that would be?

     

    ### [PREVIOUS LINE REPEATED 1 TIMES] ###
    Nov 17 22:29:00 Westcotts root: Executing hook script: post_plugin_checks
    Nov 17 22:29:00 Westcotts root: plugin: installing: dynamix.unraid.net.plg
    Nov 17 22:29:00 Westcotts root: Executing hook script: pre_plugin_checks
    Nov 17 22:29:00 Westcotts root: plugin: running: anonymous
    Nov 17 22:29:00 Westcotts root: Installing dynamix.unraid.net.plg 2022.11.02.0859 with Unraid API 2.53.0
    Nov 17 22:29:00 Westcotts root: plugin: running: anonymous
    Nov 17 22:29:00 Westcotts root: Checking DNS...
    Nov 17 22:29:03 Westcotts kernel: igc 0000:01:00.0 eth0: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
    Nov 17 22:29:03 Westcotts kernel: br0: port 1(eth0) entered blocking state
    Nov 17 22:29:03 Westcotts kernel: br0: port 1(eth0) entered forwarding state
    Nov 17 22:29:05 Westcotts  ntpd[990]: Listen normally on 2 br0 192.168.10.222:123
    Nov 17 22:29:05 Westcotts  ntpd[990]: new interface(s) found: waking up resolver
    Nov 17 22:29:30 Westcotts root: ⚠️ Warning: Your DNS server (1.1.1.1) is unable to resolve 'unraid-dl.sfo2.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com'
    Nov 17 22:30:00 Westcotts root: ⚠️ Warning: Your DNS server (1.1.1.1) is unable to resolve 'registration.unraid.net'
    Nov 17 22:30:30 Westcotts root: ⚠️ Warning: Your DNS server (1.1.1.1) is unable to resolve 'mothership.unraid.net'
    Nov 17 22:31:00 Westcotts root: ⚠️ Warning: Your DNS server (1.1.1.1) is unable to resolve 'wanip4.unraid.net'
    Nov 17 22:31:30 Westcotts root: ⚠️ Warning: Your DNS server (1.1.1.1) is unable to resolve 'backup.unraid.net'
    Nov 17 22:31:30 Westcotts root:   Recommend navigating to Settings -> Network Settings and changing your DNS server to 8.8.8.8
    Nov 17 22:31:30 Westcotts root: Validating /boot/config/plugins/dynamix.my.servers/dynamix.unraid.net.txz...  ok.
    Nov 17 22:31:33 Westcotts root: Validating /boot/config/plugins/dynamix.my.servers/unraid-api.tgz...  ok.
    Nov 17 22:31:33 Westcotts root: plugin: checking: /boot/config/plugins/dynamix.my.servers/dynamix.unraid.net.txz - SHA256
    Nov 17 22:31:33 Westcotts root: plugin: skipping: /boot/config/plugins/dynamix.my.servers/dynamix.unraid.net.txz already exists
    Nov 17 22:31:33 Westcotts root: plugin: checking: /boot/config/plugins/dynamix.my.servers/unraid-api.tgz - SHA256
    Nov 17 22:31:33 Westcotts root: plugin: skipping: /boot/config/plugins/dynamix.my.servers/unraid-api.tgz already exists
    Nov 17 22:31:33 Westcotts root: plugin: running: anonymous
    ### [PREVIOUS LINE REPEATED 1 TIMES] ###
    Nov 17 22:31:33 Westcotts root: 🕹️ Installing JavaScript web components
    Nov 17 22:31:42 Westcotts root:  Finished installing web components
    Nov 17 22:31:42 Westcotts root: plugin: running: anonymous
    ### [PREVIOUS LINE REPEATED 1 TIMES] ###
    Nov 17 22:31:42 Westcotts root: 
    Nov 17 22:31:42 Westcotts root: +==============================================================================
    Nov 17 22:31:42 Westcotts root: | Installing new package /boot/config/plugins/dynamix.my.servers/dynamix.unraid.net.txz
    Nov 17 22:31:42 Westcotts root: +==============================================================================
    Nov 17 22:31:42 Westcotts root: 
    Nov 17 22:31:42 Westcotts root: Verifying package dynamix.unraid.net.txz.
    Nov 17 22:31:42 Westcotts root: Installing package dynamix.unraid.net.txz:
    Nov 17 22:31:42 Westcotts root: PACKAGE DESCRIPTION:
    Nov 17 22:31:43 Westcotts root: Package dynamix.unraid.net.txz installed.
    Nov 17 22:31:43 Westcotts root: 
    Nov 17 22:31:43 Westcotts root:  Installation is complete
    Nov 17 22:31:43 Westcotts root: 
    Nov 17 22:31:43 Westcotts root: plugin: dynamix.unraid.net.plg installed
    ### [PREVIOUS LINE REPEATED 1 TIMES] ###

     

    westcotts-diagnostics-20221117-2254.zip

  8. @NLS I think it was an oversight about people not having internet during boot. There's probably a decent amount between the people (like myself) who use a VM to run router software, people who have an offline box, or other networking or other small blockages until boot. 

     

    For the VM group, I'm sure it wouldn't be too tough to add a setting to delay these checks until system boots, or some other possible workarounds.  Guess it depends on if they see this as something worth solving or not. In their defense, this is only an issue during testing times or a power blip because I leave my box on 24/7 (as do the majority I think).

     

    Good to hear I'm not the only one having these issues though. Cheers!

    • Like 1
  9. I agree. Ive noticed this check adds at least 3 mins to the boot time if internet is down because it's being run from a VM from the same server. @ljm42 Is there another method, which is possible, without these long delays?

     

    Also, it seems that I'm getting a 5min jump between these 2 steps: emhttpd: shcmd (21): /etc/rc.d/rc.nginx start and Starting Nginx server daemon... So does this also mean nginx is timing out too?

     

    Any help/insight would be appreciated as I'd love to get my boot times to something reasonable if possible. Thanks!

  10. 21 hours ago, Atoz said:

    I have just migrated from truenas Core to Unraid, enjoying the platform thus far;

    i have completed my ZFS Setup on unraid via Space Invaders one - 'setting up a native ZFS pool on unraid - youtube guide' (method one via terminal without installing truenas as a vm) - 

     

     

    I have followed his steps verbatim, and i can confirm my zfs companion confirms my zfs pool is healthy and online. 

     

    Setup:

    USB: Boot drive

    Array Drive: 1 x 500gb SSD 

    ZFS drive(s): 6 x 4tb raidz1

     

    i can confirm i have access to the array drive within windows, & and i can read and write to the drive. 

    However, when i try to write any data to the ZFS folder (simlink directory that was added as per steps shown in the attached youtube video @ 31.50) windows advises : "you need permission to perform this action" 

     

    what steps are required so i can write data to my ZFS dataset within windows?

    i will be installing plex shortly. In Truenas Core, users had the option of allowing Jails to have read only access to the data within the ZFS, is this possible with unraid?

     

    Thanks in advance 

     

    Hey Atoz,

     

    I followed the same video too and had the same permissions issues you did on the shares of symlinks he recommends. Not sure if something changed in the plugins after @SpaceInvaderOne created his awesome tutorials. I solved it by changing the permissions of my ZFS top level mount to 775 vs 755 (it is now by default) through Unpaid terminal. This allowed it to get read & write permissions vs just read over SMB. Not 100% this is the right thing I should be doing to make it work, but it is a quick solution.

     

    There has to be a better way to share these pools though, as the other gotcha I came into is that the symlink (therefore ZFS storage pool) is limited by the size of the array drive space vs the actual size of the pool. ie 250GB vs 50TB