Aldamir

Also had the issue that i had to update manually, your command fixed it, thanks!

So, maybe this is helpful for someone down the line. Currently i run this setup: AsRock H570M-ITX , i5-11400, 8GB Ram (1 Stick) - previously 16GB with 2 sticks 1 Cache SSD SN570 1TB (previously 2 SSDs) 3x Seagate IronWolf 8TB, PSU: Corsair RM650x (previously SF450 Platinum, SFX) I managed to reduce my C-state from C7 to C10 and reduce idle power consumtion (meaning HDD spun down but with various docker containers running) from 21W to 11W. With a Reddit guide that utilizes AMISCE, i manage to reach C8, but only leading to 1-2W less Removing the SSD of the CPU PCIe-lane, got me to C10 and another few Watts Removing a Ram slot lead to a neglible difference What really changed a lot was using the ATX-PSU RM650x which performs way better than the SF450 Platinum (which was already tested for the RM550x, for other low wattage PSUs check Wolfgangs PSU db. Maybe that helps someone down the line

Thanks for the quick fix!!

I tested mobile (Android 14) with Firefox, on Macbook (maxOS 14.6.1 (23G93) with Firefox and Safari, on Linux Mint 22. Also got the error in the attached image.. But i will probably just roll back to a stable unraid version UPDATE: Well i downgraded to 6.12.13 and still have the issue, see the second image... Thanks for any idea and help!

I tried to use the plugin in Unraid 7 beta 2 and the UI freezes - in the dev tools i see an "unsupported OS" message. Thanks for any help! thonas-diagnostics-20240922-0923.zip

Ok, danke - ich dachte vielleicht muss ich Molex auf 2xSATA und Sata auf 2xSATA nehmen, da es der Pico nicht packt, aber zeigt einmal mehr, dass ich nicht so viel Plan hab. 😅 Danke für die ganze Hilfe!! 😍

Klingt gut, danke! Dann werde ich das Inter-Tech PSU mit dem Leicke Netzteil nehmen! Kann ich einen Sata auf 4xSata Splitter nehmen oder muss ich da aufpassen? Danke vielmals!

Das hab ich scheinbar nicht richtig kappiert, danke fürs nochmals erklären! Das macht natürlich viel Sinn, dann noch lieber die 160W Variante! Leider war das Angebot, welches du ursprünglich verlinkt hattest, nicht mehr verfügbar, daher hätte ich alternativ das von Inter-tech genommen https://geizhals.de/inter-tech-mini-itx-psu-200w-88882190-a2364184.html , https://www.inter-tech.de/files/images/psu/88882188/Mini-ITX_PSU_160W.pdf - das hat laut Datenblatt auch 8A auf der 12V Schiene. Das dürfte dann doch passen, oder habe ich da etwas falsch verstanden? Danke vielmals für eure ganze Hilfe!

Top, danke dann werd ichs auch mal so und mit dem 120W Pico probieren

Leider leider wird ohne zusätzliches Tweaken 120W bei mir nicht reichen. Wenn ich fio (für HDD Auslastung) und prime95 laufen lasse, kommt mein System auf gut 160W (auch wenn ich PL2 auf 65W begrenze). Nur wenn ich Turbo Boost deaktivieren, bleibe ich mit bis max 100W gut im Bereich. Ist die Frage, wie groß der Unterschied in einem Home Nas mit einigen Docker Containern und vor allem Plex Server wirklich ist. Weiß da jemand mehr? Die Pico's mit 120W sind schon recht attraktiv, da günstiger und im Idle wohl auch minimal effizienter bei den gleichen Idle-Watt. Danke euch!

Ok thanks a lot for all your help @JorgeB @itimpi - would have struggled a lot longer or not be able to rescue my stuff if you didn't help!!

Ah yeah, makes sense! I only have three drives (2 data drives, 1 parity) and i double checked now. The mounted disk is used with 75%, which should explain why it showed it this way. Thanks for explainig So can i start the parity check now, right?

This was when the disk was unmountable, yes! But since i only have three disks, one of which parity, it should show a bigger difference, i guess? But i guess, i would have to live with the loss of data anyway Since the disk is mountable again, should i start the parity check now? Thanks for all the support!

Checked the filesystem and it seemed to do the trick - the Disk 1 (the one that actually mounted) reported a fatal error during the process with the comment to rerun the check, the second run had the attached output. I think some files were put in a lost+found share. I'm not entirely sure but i think the connect plattform showed me 75% usage of the array and now only 70% - is it possible that some data was completely lost apart from the lost & found? Should i run a parity check now? Thanks for the quick help! Disk2_sdc_output.rtf Disk1_sdd_output.rtf thonas-diagnostics-20240916-1530.zip

Logs are attached, please don't mind the key error - i had to reassign the key to the new flash drive - thanks for checking and helping! thonas-diagnostics-20240916-1530.zip