nexusmaniac

Ok, I'll change the name servers I'm pretty comfortable with it haha Here's the output of the command: root@Raptor:~# docker exec -it Transmission ifconfig eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 172.17.0.2 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 0.0.0.0 ether 02:42:ac:11:00:02 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet) RX packets 122 bytes 19717 (19.2 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 104 bytes 12202 (11.9 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 loop txqueuelen 1 (Local Loopback) RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 tun0: flags=4305<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 10.32.10.6 netmask 255.255.255.255 destination 10.32.10.5 unspec 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 txqueuelen 100 (UNSPEC) RX packets 13 bytes 5890 (5.7 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 30 bytes 3699 (3.6 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

root@localhost:# /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix.docker.manager/scripts/docker run -d --name="Transmission" --net="bridge" --privileged="true" -e TZ="Europe/London" -e HOST_OS="unRAID" -e "VPN_ENABLED"="yes" -e "VPN_USER"="BLANK" -e "VPN_PASS"="BLANK" -e "VPN_REMOTE"="nl.privateinternetaccess.com" -e "VPN_PORT"="1194" -e "VPN_PROTOCOL"="udp" -e "VPN_PROV"="pia" -e "ENABLE_PRIVOXY"="no" -e "LAN_NETWORK"="192.168.0.0/24" -e "WHITELIST"="*.*.*.*" -e "DEBUG"="false" -e "PUID"="99" -e "PGID"="100" -e "VPN_DEVICE_TYPE"="tun" -e "STRONG_CERTS"="no" -e "PHP_TZ"="Europe/London" -e "NAME_SERVERS"="192.168.0.254" -p 9091:9091/tcp -p 8118:8118/tcp -v "/mnt/user/Media/Transmission/":"/data":rw -v "/etc/localtime":"/etc/localtime":ro -v "/mnt/cache/appdata/transmission/":"/config":rw activ/arch-transmissionvpn

Neither 1.0 or latest work on unRAID 6.3 rc9. The version you uploaded yday did work for me (I just had to add the extra config options) The logs seem normal: ErrorWarningSystemArrayLogin usermod: no changes [info] Env var PUID defined as 99 [info] Env var PGID defined as 100 [info] Permissions already set for /config [info] Starting Supervisor... 2017-01-29 11:41:40,184 CRIT Set uid to user 0 2017-01-29 11:41:40,184 INFO Included extra file "/etc/supervisor/conf.d/transmission.conf" during parsing 2017-01-29 11:41:40,187 INFO supervisord started with pid 15 2017-01-29 11:41:41,189 INFO spawned: 'checkproc-script' with pid 18 2017-01-29 11:41:41,191 INFO spawned: 'start-script' with pid 19 2017-01-29 11:41:41,192 INFO spawned: 'transmission-script' with pid 20 2017-01-29 11:41:41,194 INFO spawned: 'privoxy-script' with pid 21 2017-01-29 11:41:41,199 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] VPN is enabled, beginning configuration of VPN 2017-01-29 11:41:41,199 INFO success: checkproc-script entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 0 seconds (startsecs) 2017-01-29 11:41:41,199 INFO success: start-script entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 0 seconds (startsecs) 2017-01-29 11:41:41,199 INFO success: transmission-script entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 0 seconds (startsecs) 2017-01-29 11:41:41,199 INFO success: privoxy-script entered RUNNING state, process has stayed up for > than 0 seconds (startsecs) 2017-01-29 11:41:41,201 DEBG 'transmission-script' stdout output: [info] VPN is enabled, checking VPN tunnel local ip is valid 2017-01-29 11:41:41,202 DEBG 'privoxy-script' stdout output: [info] Privoxy set to disabled 2017-01-29 11:41:41,202 DEBG fd 24 closed, stopped monitoring <POutputDispatcher at 47749247123608 for <Subprocess at 47749247226944 with name privoxy-script in state RUNNING> (stderr)> 2017-01-29 11:41:41,202 DEBG fd 20 closed, stopped monitoring <POutputDispatcher at 47749247125336 for <Subprocess at 47749247226944 with name privoxy-script in state RUNNING> (stdout)> 2017-01-29 11:41:41,202 INFO exited: privoxy-script (exit status 0; expected) 2017-01-29 11:41:41,202 DEBG received SIGCLD indicating a child quit 2017-01-29 11:41:41,207 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] VPN default certs defined, copying to /config/openvpn/... 2017-01-29 11:41:41,209 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] VPN config file (ovpn extension) is located at /config/openvpn/openvpn.ovpn 2017-01-29 11:41:41,211 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [warn] VPN provider remote port incorrect, overriding to 1198 2017-01-29 11:41:41,249 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] Default route for container is 172.17.0.1 2017-01-29 11:41:41,251 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] Adding 192.168.0.0/24 as route via docker eth0 2017-01-29 11:41:41,252 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] ip route defined as follows... -------------------- 2017-01-29 11:41:41,253 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: default via 172.17.0.1 dev eth0 172.17.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.0.2 192.168.0.0/24 via 172.17.0.1 dev eth0 2017-01-29 11:41:41,253 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: -------------------- 2017-01-29 11:41:41,256 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] iptable_mangle support detected, adding fwmark for tables 2017-01-29 11:41:41,284 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] iptables defined as follows... -------------------- 2017-01-29 11:41:41,285 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: -P INPUT DROP -P FORWARD ACCEPT -P OUTPUT DROP -A INPUT -i tun0 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -s 172.17.0.0/16 -d 172.17.0.0/16 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i eth0 -p udp -m udp --sport 1198 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 9091 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -m tcp --sport 9091 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p udp -m udp --sport 53 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p icmp -m icmp --icmp-type 0 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A OUTPUT -o tun0 -j ACCEPT -A OUTPUT -s 172.17.0.0/16 -d 172.17.0.0/16 -j ACCEPT -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p udp -m udp --dport 1198 -j ACCEPT -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 9091 -j ACCEPT -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp -m tcp --sport 9091 -j ACCEPT -A OUTPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A OUTPUT -p icmp -m icmp --icmp-type 8 -j ACCEPT -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT 2017-01-29 11:41:41,285 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: -------------------- 2017-01-29 11:41:41,285 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] Starting OpenVPN... 2017-01-29 11:41:41,299 DEBG 'start-script' stdout output: [info] OpenVPN started But I cannot connect the the webUI

Yeah, I understand what you want, it's just a bad idea unless you know exactly what you are doing. The VPN service does not firewall the endpoint connection, so theoretically connecting to them allows other vpn users on the same network node free access to your system totally bypassing your router, since unraid doesn't have a built in firewall. I personally would never risk it. Binhex's dockers go to great lengths to ensure isolation and security, to make sure VPN traffic doesn't leak out of the docker, or vice versa. Network security is hard. Too many ways for things to go wrong, and not many ways to do it right. Aha, ok cool - Well that's fair enough! Sadly my Linux networking knowledge is very lacking... I'll have to sacrifice using my tiny docker containers and grab VPN specific versions Thanks!

Normally this specific plugin is used to provide a private tunnel for you to connect back to your server from outside securely. Connecting to a VPN service is better served by Binhex's VPN enabled torrent and nzb dockers. I'm talking about the client, to push all traffic through a PIA VPN As opposed to hosting a VPN server to connect back into my home network I have used various VPN dockers but I very much prefer this implementation, meaning I can use dockers which take up less room, all use the same alpine base image (big user of LinuxServerIO dockers ) I just hoped there would be a way of either excluding a docker from the tun5 network... OR a way in the docker config to use a completely separate network / network interface

Hi, I've tried searching through this thread (search is so annoying ) But can't find the answer! Is it possible to use the OpenVPN client plugin to connect only specific things, i.e. I need all of my dockers going through a VPN except for Plex, which doesn't work remotely when going through a VPN So is there a way to bypass / exclude a single docker container from using the VPN / TUN interface? Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks

Sorry, I'd walk you through step by step but I've not got access to my unRAID atm You need to go into the profile page, create custom profile, Google "Minecraft Server", get to the official Minecraft page, there'll be a link to minecraft_server_x.x.jar, right click, copy link address. Back over to M-OS, paste that link into the server.jar box in the custom profile creator, then give it a name, save - And you should be good

Any chance you could update the mineos container, op? It's pretty outdated and the latest version on mineos can do a fair bit more, much easier!

Damn this update is impressive! My transmission virtual size dropped from around 200mb all the way down to 17!? That is pretty awesome, looking forward to the rest of your containers to receive their alpine updates

And my hypothesis was incorrect, logs inside the container also report the old version root@Raptor:/config/log# cat openvpn.log | grep version 2016-08-02 19:40:32+0100 [-] ACCESS SERVER starting, version=2.0.24 2016-08-03 19:07:10+0100 [-] ACCESS SERVER starting, version=2.0.24 2016-08-06 09:30:04+0100 [-] ACCESS SERVER starting, version=2.0.24 2016-08-06 10:40:30+0100 [-] ACCESS SERVER starting, version=2.0.24

Haha, fair enough I shall have to get round to that next week then Do you reckon I'd have to do that every time the docker is updated? Or just this once to 'fix' something that's gone wonky? The files of the app itself are stored outside the container. So i'd say everytime the app itself is updated at this stage. Damn! Hypothetically, if I were to remove the /confif -> /mnt/cache/...... mapping. Would the files of the app persist through updates / do you think that would allow the app to properly update itself each time an update comes out?

Haha, fair enough I shall have to get round to that next week then Do you reckon I'd have to do that every time the docker is updated? Or just this once to 'fix' something that's gone wonky?

Hi LSIO team Just wondering where the best place to request new docker containers is, has a quick little look around but didn't see a "requests go here" thread I'd love to get a fully up to date mineos docker container going There's only one in CA and it's not been updated for a while, it's not on the latest version and that's strange, because the latest version was released before the docker image was updated hehe! But the latest mineos release has done great features and makes modded servers crazy easy But like I said, idk if this is the right place to ask

No worries mate. My excuse is that its 8:18pm here and Ive had a wine or 2 Interesting observation though. Mine doesn't appear to have been updated either but interestingly I am on 2.0.20. I'll raise it with Sparkly. Haha, nice! I'm supposed to be enjoying a holiday, but just can't resist updating my dockers I do wonder if it's just OpenVPN-as reporting the version incorrectly for some reason I couldn't find a --version command anywhere inside the docker itself though, so it's just a theory atm Ive asked the question, I am sure Sparkly will look into it when he gets a minute. The very fact that you're reporting a different version to me though suggests that the old Container almost certainly did auto update (answer to a previous question in the thread). The new Alpine Container has certainly had the auto update feature removed BUT as you say, we are not showing 2.12. The common thing between us both is that we upgraded from the old Container - Ill test doing a completely fresh install with fresh appdata and see if that works. I deleted my app data config folder for this app and did a completely new install and the GUI is now reporting 2.12. I am not sure if this will end up being the formal advice but if you really MUST have the latest version now (assuming it wasn't the latest version before and the GUI was just not reporting it right) then doing what I suggest will work. Its not a huge drama really as it pretty much works out of the box and the setup and config is only 10 mins of your time. If you don't want to do this though, suggest wait for formal advice from Sparkly. Wicked! Thank you for testing that I would do this, but the only was I'm able to connect to unRAID right now is by connecting to my openVPN server haha But if this ended up being the formal advice, like you said, it'll only be a few mins of setup Thankfully I'm not doing anything too complicated with my setup haha I'll standby for Sparkly's verdict

No worries mate. My excuse is that its 8:18pm here and Ive had a wine or 2 Interesting observation though. Mine doesn't appear to have been updated either but interestingly I am on 2.0.20. I'll raise it with Sparkly. Haha, nice! I'm supposed to be enjoying a holiday, but just can't resist updating my dockers I do wonder if it's just OpenVPN-as reporting the version incorrectly for some reason I couldn't find a --version command anywhere inside the docker itself though, so it's just a theory atm

Oops, I realised that I didn't say once what my issue was!! I'm just posting to say that my server version hasn't been bumped for some reason I'm still on 2.0.24 instead of the latest 2.12 version I can't figure out why though, as I've definitely been updated to the latest docker image

Hi sparkly! Unless I'm looking in the wrong place Access Server version: 2.0.24 I'm definitely on the xenial version, just based on the logs: [s6-init] making user provided files available at /var/run/s6/etc...exited 0. [s6-init] ensuring user provided files have correct perms...exited 0. [fix-attrs.d] applying ownership & permissions fixes... [fix-attrs.d] done. [cont-init.d] executing container initialization scripts... [cont-init.d] 10-adduser: executing... ------------------------------------- _ _ _ | |___| (_) ___ | / __| | |/ _ \ | \__ \ | | (_) | |_|___/ |_|\___/ |_| Brought to you by linuxserver.io We do accept donations at: https://www.linuxserver.io/donations ------------------------------------- GID/UID ------------------------------------- User uid: 99 User gid: 100 ------------------------------------- [cont-init.d] 10-adduser: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 20-time: executing... Current default time zone: 'Europe/London' Local time is now: Sat Aug 6 10:40:29 BST 2016. Universal Time is now: Sat Aug 6 09:40:29 UTC 2016. [cont-init.d] 20-time: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 30-config: executing... [cont-init.d] 30-config: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 40-openvpn-init: executing... [cont-init.d] 40-openvpn-init: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 50-interface: executing... MOD Default {} {} MOD Default {} {} MOD Default {} {} MOD Default {} {} [cont-init.d] 50-interface: exited 0. [cont-init.d] done. [services.d] starting services [services.d] done. Any ideas? Have you updated the container? I thought I'd made that clear in my post? Yes, I updated it this morning, and restarted it about 5 mins ago to see if that made a difference too, it did not

Hi sparkly! Unless I'm looking in the wrong place Access Server version: 2.0.24 I'm definitely on the xenial version, just based on the logs: [s6-init] making user provided files available at /var/run/s6/etc...exited 0. [s6-init] ensuring user provided files have correct perms...exited 0. [fix-attrs.d] applying ownership & permissions fixes... [fix-attrs.d] done. [cont-init.d] executing container initialization scripts... [cont-init.d] 10-adduser: executing... ------------------------------------- _ _ _ | |___| (_) ___ | / __| | |/ _ \ | \__ \ | | (_) | |_|___/ |_|\___/ |_| Brought to you by linuxserver.io We do accept donations at: https://www.linuxserver.io/donations ------------------------------------- GID/UID ------------------------------------- User uid: 99 User gid: 100 ------------------------------------- [cont-init.d] 10-adduser: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 20-time: executing... Current default time zone: 'Europe/London' Local time is now: Sat Aug 6 10:40:29 BST 2016. Universal Time is now: Sat Aug 6 09:40:29 UTC 2016. [cont-init.d] 20-time: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 30-config: executing... [cont-init.d] 30-config: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 40-openvpn-init: executing... [cont-init.d] 40-openvpn-init: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 50-interface: executing... MOD Default {} {} MOD Default {} {} MOD Default {} {} MOD Default {} {} [cont-init.d] 50-interface: exited 0. [cont-init.d] done. [services.d] starting services [services.d] done. Any ideas?