
jumperalex
Members-
Content Count
2000 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
jumperalex started following Unraid OS version 6.8 available, Unraid OS version 6.8.3 available and 2020 Router Recommendations
-
Updated to 6.8.3 with no issues.
-
Honestly I can't recommend anything other than a ubiquity unifi security gateway or edgerouter (pick the model right for you, I have a Lite), plus the AP of your choice (I have a nanoHD) Or a Dream Machine if you want an all in one solution. Sent from my SM-P205 using Tapatalk
-
That is sad and I understand your reasoning. And nothing I say below should be read as a call to change your current plan. That said, I disagree that LT has made it self tuning. Default settings for even the one main tunable, md_num_stripes, makes a difference for my 7 disk array. Setting it to 5120 improved my parity by 10% from default. Not sure if this is the best speed:memory option, but i also guess I don't need a full script to test out a few options. But for sure default is slower than tweaked. FWIW, I'm getting same speed in 6.8 tweaked as 6.7 tweaked which was the same spe
-
Upgraded from 6.7.2 without difficulty.
-
okay, I get it now. Sorry for the noise.
-
Yeah that's where I looked and the only two files that I see are screen.conf and settings.conf settings only has this # # MakeMKV settings file, written by MakeMKV v1.14.5 linux(x64-release) # app_DataDir = "/config/data" app_DestinationDir = "/output" app_DestinationType = "3" app_ExpertMode = "1" app_Java = "" app_UpdateEnable = "0" app_ccextractor = "/usr/bin/ccextractor" sdf_Stop = ""
-
The problem is getting it to survive. I can't find the config file that's written to edit it
-
You would think so from the posting, and yet it works (or says it does) when I paste it into the register pop-up.
-
Hmmm I just removed to include deleting the image; reloaded; and still say expired key. When I paste the current key found on the author's beta page it accepts it, but requires a restart so the key doesn't survive.
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Unifi-Controller
jumperalex replied to linuxserver.io's topic in Docker Containers
All love man -
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Unifi-Controller
jumperalex replied to linuxserver.io's topic in Docker Containers
[looks around confused] did I say something I didn't mean to? I wasn't asking anyone to change the way the container runs. I was asking where the latest "stable" release was as described by Unifi. Then saarg explained to me where this container sources (read: the repo) and I acknowledged I then understood why the container wasn't grabbing the latest (read: unifi hadn't posted to the repo yet). As for my reply to your post about it not being wise pushing stable to a production environment ... I'm right that it's the user's choice and their responsibility to choose what tag to use be -
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Unifi-Controller
jumperalex replied to linuxserver.io's topic in Docker Containers
Fair. But that's us users decision to make. I think they have a tag for that ... LTS? But yeah, can't deny what you're saying in general. -
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Unifi-Controller
jumperalex replied to linuxserver.io's topic in Docker Containers
5.11.39 has been deemed stable according to this https://community.ui.com/releases/UniFi-Network-Controller-5-11-39/6ab8ef1a-376f-41e6-85b2-ceec098b8462 Sadly, as you're surely aware, they still haven't pushed to the repos. [sigh] -
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Unifi-Controller
jumperalex replied to linuxserver.io's topic in Docker Containers
"posted" as in to the LIO servers or Ubiquiti's? They are already at Ubiquiti and I'm using latest.