jumperalex

uggg when and why did this happen How hard / is it possible to copy my config over to the new LIO docker? Really not looking to redo all my clients 😮

FWIW, I have a marvell controller (HighPoint Rocket 620 2-port) and upgrade went fine. IOMMU group 18: [1b4b:9120] 05:00.0 SATA controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9120 SATA 6Gb/s Controller (rev 12) [1b4b:91a4] 05:00.1 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE912x IDE Controller (rev 12)

Fixed it for me too. Anyone know the issue and if it is something for linuxserver to fix or further upstream?

See sig for context ... For unraid memory speed has no real impact. What matters is PCIe bandwidth and even a touch of OC there isn't going to be worth it especially if it has any impact on reliability. Afterall, that's why you're going ECC isn't it? 8GB is fine unless you're going REALLY crazy with running dockers and VMs. I ran with 8GB on a single stick for a long time with no problems at all; but I was also only streaming two plex streams at most and usually direct not transcoded. I only upgraded to 16GB because DDR3 is getting pricey so I thought I'd buy for the future before it got too expensive. I have the ROG STRIX B450 for my desktop. Love it. ECC compatible but I didn't choose to go that route for a desktop. I'd have no concerns using it for unraid; in fact I choose it both for current use and as a hand-me-down future-proof for unraid knowing I'd want ECC DDR4. As for which ram to choose [shrug] I've had good luck so far with Kingston (again ... see sig). Looking at your link I wouldn't just go for the cheapest. This is for the long haul man. Go out drinking one less night

sadly no. I really haven't thought about this issue since DarkHorse's post.

haha fair play. I've never had any other "worse" problems. But yeah now I know. I wonder if that might be something worth adding as a caution actually in the docker overview box? "Note: This Docker image is more dependent on an up-to-date image than you might be used to. Any application problems may be solved by a docker update" or something like that ... Just saying. And saying Thank You!

I update every month on schedule. Forcing a docker update now ... yup, there are updates ... done ... and there I can now see it grabbing the new plexpass version in the log using the same url that I said I found on plex.tv myself. That is rather annoying 😛 But now I know. Thanks.

Resurrecting this a bit ... so based on what you said I do indeed see that version 1.15.0.659 is available as a plexpass verison for me. But my log says it still isn't available. Atempting to upgrade to: 1.15.0.659-xxx https://downloads.plex.tv/plex-media-server/1.15.0.659-xxx/plexmediaserver_1.15.0.659-xxx_amd64.deb: 2019-02-16 10:09:37 ERROR 404: Not Found. ######################################################## # Upgrade attempt failed, this could be because either # # plex update site is down, local network issues, or # # you were trying to get a version that simply doesn't # # exist, check over the VERSION variable thoroughly & # # correct it or try again later. # ######################################################## I've been running for quite some time and updates have occurred in the past. I'm on 1.14.1.5488 right now. I recall a while back seeing an update issue but I ignored it at the time and it "went away" some time later when I next looked. I chalked it up to resolved connection issues, but now I'm thinking it "went away" because the plexpass version moved to stable and the download succeeded. I do see mention on the git readme about "IMPORTANT NOTE:- YOU CANNOT UPDATE TO A PLEXPASS ONLY (BETA) VERSION IF YOU ARE NOT LOGGED IN WITH A PLEXPASS ACCOUNT" which makes me ask, logged in where? inside my plex docker instance? yup, done that. In a parameter of the docker set-up? I don't see where to do that. On my desktop I can download the 1.15 verison, and did as a test. But the link for THAT is "https://downloads.plex.tv/plex-media-server-new/1.15.0.659-xxx/debian/plexmediaserver_1.15.0.659-xxx_amd64.deb which is different than where the dockers seems to be attempting to pull from. While logged into the plex.tv website the docker link doesn't work from my browser either. But maybe the deb version is what I should be testing against? Any help is appreciated and by all means tell me what other info I might need to provide.

Is there somewhere you've read this? I have not heard about reboots having anything to do with reducing the risk of kernal panics. I don't know that you can accumulate flipped bits that eventually just get to be too many, or flip a bit that doesn't manifest a panic until some time in the future, but if you just reboot soon enough you'll avoid the problem. A bit flip is either going to cause a panic, cause a data error, or be in a place that won't do anything of consequence. I feel like starting here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_random-access_memory#Error_detection_and_correction and then falling down the rabbit hole of reading actual research is probably the only way to get real data rather than opinions.

If you want to use ECC at non-server prices and easier to source you could go AMD. See my sig for my current setup. Most/all Asus (Asrock too?) support ECC. I know my desktop's MB an ASUS ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING supports it in spec, but I didn't use ECC for it. Seemed overkill for a desktop machine. As for "worth it" I have to admit I can't say I have my own evidence of the benefits, but there is no shortage of info out there debating the benefits in the server world and specifically when using virtualization.

Is anyone having any luck getting the preview function to work? I mean when I click PREVIEW it opens a window that shows me an image that represents what will be encoded size / aspect wise but I don't see an option to get an actual 10sec playable click like discussed here: https://handbrake.fr/docs/en/1.1.0/workflow/preview-settings.html

Just updated from 6.5.3 to 6.6.1. basic dockers (in sig) no VM's ... all is well. I ran the update assistant before hand which let me know the ancient dynamix plug-in was on my flash so I commented that out (though I don't think it was actually be used since I had all the CA based dynamix plug-ins installed and they stayed after reboot and after upgrade) and made sure all my plugins were up-to-date (CA was out of date). All works well and I mostly like the new UI. Running at 90% scale on a 1920x1200 is pretty close to what I like. In all cases I always prefer "compact" spacing so as not to waste space and get more info. If that means using contrasting colors / borders etc to delineate UI element groups that's my preference over lots of blank space. Well done!

PM sent

Like it so far. You know its weird I hate light themes on phones and do everything I can to make it as dark as possible. And I run a dark theme on Reddit (technically a dark grey and maybe that's the difference) but for just about every other forum i prefer a light theme. I don't know what it is about the dark theme for unraid I don't like, but I just don't. If I can put my finger on it and it's not just a weirdness of me I'll post it here fwiw.