jumperalex

okay, I get it now. Sorry for the noise.

Yeah that's where I looked and the only two files that I see are screen.conf and settings.conf settings only has this # # MakeMKV settings file, written by MakeMKV v1.14.5 linux(x64-release) # app_DataDir = "/config/data" app_DestinationDir = "/output" app_DestinationType = "3" app_ExpertMode = "1" app_Java = "" app_UpdateEnable = "0" app_ccextractor = "/usr/bin/ccextractor" sdf_Stop = ""

The problem is getting it to survive. I can't find the config file that's written to edit it

You would think so from the posting, and yet it works (or says it does) when I paste it into the register pop-up.

Hmmm I just removed to include deleting the image; reloaded; and still say expired key. When I paste the current key found on the author's beta page it accepts it, but requires a restart so the key doesn't survive.

All love man

[looks around confused] did I say something I didn't mean to? I wasn't asking anyone to change the way the container runs. I was asking where the latest "stable" release was as described by Unifi. Then saarg explained to me where this container sources (read: the repo) and I acknowledged I then understood why the container wasn't grabbing the latest (read: unifi hadn't posted to the repo yet). As for my reply to your post about it not being wise pushing stable to a production environment ... I'm right that it's the user's choice and their responsibility to choose what tag to use because this container pulls from the repo and what's in the repo is what it gets; at least according to saarg. So "the second it comes out" on the repos is when LSIO will be pushing it unless they make a decision to change their source. I mean seriously man, I wasn't trying to stir the pot or poke anyone in the eye.

Fair. But that's us users decision to make. I think they have a tag for that ... LTS? But yeah, can't deny what you're saying in general.

5.11.39 has been deemed stable according to this https://community.ui.com/releases/UniFi-Network-Controller-5-11-39/6ab8ef1a-376f-41e6-85b2-ceec098b8462 Sadly, as you're surely aware, they still haven't pushed to the repos. [sigh]

"posted" as in to the LIO servers or Ubiquiti's? They are already at Ubiquiti and I'm using latest.

soooo what needs to be done to get on the 5.11.39 version?

Anyone played around with it? https://lifehacker.com/why-you-should-use-windows-defenders-ransomware-prevent-1837311176 I know this isn't explicitly UNRAID related but we spend a fair bit of time talking about protecting our servers and thought this might be worth a discussion. After I turned the feature on I went to add more locations and noticed BOOM my linked \\tower shares showed up by default. To be sure, these are the locations that are part of my mapped Windows Libraries such as Music, Videos, etc. Notice something missing? No of course you woulnd't ... my Movies share isn't there because it isn't part of a Windows Library. It was easy enough to the missing \\tower\movies share. While typing this post I got my first alert PickerHost.exe seems harmless enough from searching. Though I have no idea what it is doing in My Data Sources. A little research showed PickerHost.exe to be harmless and part of windows so I used the Action|Allow on Device option. In any case, I thought some of you might be interested and I'm surprised at least a quick search didn't find any discussion. But please feel free to post the link(s) if there has been. I'm still not ready to make my SMB shares read/write since I so rarely even need to write to them externally. When I do I just change their status for a moment and then revert back. Afterall, my PC isn't the only computer / device on the network but I'll be adding this to the other windows machine soon enough and defense in depth is always the right answer.

uggg when and why did this happen How hard / is it possible to copy my config over to the new LIO docker? Really not looking to redo all my clients 😮

FWIW, I have a marvell controller (HighPoint Rocket 620 2-port) and upgrade went fine. IOMMU group 18: [1b4b:9120] 05:00.0 SATA controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9120 SATA 6Gb/s Controller (rev 12) [1b4b:91a4] 05:00.1 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE912x IDE Controller (rev 12)

Fixed it for me too. Anyone know the issue and if it is something for linuxserver to fix or further upstream?