ados

Any thoughts on this, make sense? Good idea?

Have a feature request, option to override the file age. Example, full threshold is 80% and minimum 1%, with file age on x number of days. When the schedule runs it will check if space is over 80% and then move files over the set days. However, if new files are created in high enough volume it will fill the drive with most files newer than set days. You could turn off the age setting, but most of the time you want to keep files on the cache a while to make use of the speed and avoiding disk spin. What I'm proposing is an overflow setting. If when the mover runs and the disk space is over full threshold but there's no files old enough, move the oldest files until below the full threshold. Hopefully this makes sense and isn't burdensome add.

That's a shame, thanks for the great plugin.

I don't need parallel moving of pools or do you mean you can only control a single pool 🥲.

Thanks @jcofer555 . The UI is a little confusing, it seems that you can't have different settings per pool? I'm assuming that based on the threshold numbers stay at custom values when I switch pools. It would be really nice to have per pool settings. The age based filter is excellent but I can see me wanting different values per pool etc.

Did some testing, here's what I found. The settings/tick boxes only save if you stop and start the mover as the save button is combined. Therefore my autostart was never saved and it wasn't running. However, the manual move, multiple attempted, did not find anything to move. The scheduled move triggered and it found all the files to move began moving. At first I thought it was much slower than normal mover but testing shows it is a little slower. From mover start at 96% it went down to 88% in 25 minutes. Stopping and using the Unraid mover in 15 minutes it went from 88% to 77%. Maybe coincidence but the share is fill-up so in both tests the source and destination disks are the same. Did note that shares are /mnt/user/sharename but the mover log shows it's moving them to /mnt/user0/sharename . Another note was the files move but not the folders, you end up with a bunch of empty folders in the cache pool; assume cleanup setting sorts this?

Just discovered this and looks great but having issues getting it to work. I have a cache pool 96% full because the move isn't occurring. Share is standard cache pool primary and secondary Unraid array. There's files showing in both the share and pool that should be moving. If I check the pool within the plugin it's confirming 96% full which is over the 80% threshold and 1% stop. Manually running the move says no files to move. Session finished Duration: 0s Finished move process No in-use files detected during move No shares had files to move Starting move process Move now triggered — filters disabled Plugin version: 2026.03.03.01 Session started

@Collectathon yeah I've had to do that as I couldn't get it to work with a specific database.

Just noticed this got added, looks nice. I have a lot of Redis apps already, each use their own database but I see that the template has the values split as individual parameters so I can't pass the usual Redis string. The Github doesn't mention the parameters for Redis, can I get around this?

I suspect something has changed in one of the newer Thunderbird updates? Since the windows don't have a typical close button I've always used the CRTL + W close tab/window shortcut. This allows for closing the current window but the keys no longer pass to from the host, just nothing happens. I've tried using direct IP to container, eliminating Authentik/proxy, it instead closes the host browser window. You can still type so standard keys are fine. Since you need to close windows such as mail rules for them to update I can adjust any settings or reduce windows. Has something changed? Am I doing something wrong? Edit: I lowered the browser security of the site in Chrome and I have ESC working again 🤷‍♂️

I've always wanted dynamic templates. Unraid's CA templates make docker management easier than many competing platforms, but has a long running flaw. If the maintainer changes aspects of the container through choice or is forced by upstream repo then your docker can miss out on features at best, or have security exploits or break outright at worst. Having dynamically updating templates would mitigate these issues. For security you can't have maintainers with the power to force updates to all Unraid user templates but you could build it into updates. Like when a docker has an update the template could have its own indication of new changes. The server owner selects into the docker and they select a compare button. They're shown their current template and to the side in red the new proposed and/or additional values. They can then select which ones individually to apply or apply them all.

I see there's a new Owncast update but the official repo hasn't released any updates since April of this year. What would the changes be in relation to?

Fixing docker hub rate limits

Based on the poll it might end in integrated backups before multiple arrays. I absolutely welcome an integrated backup solution as setting up custom solutions like Kopia is quite advanced. However, given the choice I want arrays first, electricity costs are ever increasing and I have a large server waiting to absorb multiple smaller ones.

I can't get Tandoor to work when behind Authentik. If exposed direct, works no issue. Use Authentik with proxy and it loads and works mostly but some images don't load. Even adding unauthenticated paths don't work, even .* If I change to Authentik with proxy forward auth the portal doesn't load any images.