Raki72

Thanks JorgeB for the quick solution. I didn't even know this setting existed. 🙂

Well, that was quick. Problem is back and diagnostics is attached. Any help is appreciated. unraid-diagnostics-20240121-2107.zip

You are right. I actually expected this to be a know issue or so, so I didn't add the diagnostics file. However, the problem us gone now. I'll post again, when the problem occurs.

My Unraid is getting full. Out of 168 TB there are now 158 TB used and 9.88 TB left. I guess that this is causing a weird problem. When I try to move files from one share to another I get these errors: - Windows: something like 0 bytes needed to move files but not available. - Linux (from the Unraid GUI): see screenshot Any idea what is going wrong? Thanks!

Nice and simple. Thanks!

Would it be possible to share this script? I am looking for something like that, but don't want to develop it frm scratch...

Well, more than that I would like to have multiple arrays per server. Because than I could simply split up my Unraid into 2 arrays and the number limitations is kind of irrelevant. Is there an ETA for the "multiple array" or multiple pools concept?

I am considering to buy a X400. These things are dirt cheap. But documentation is nowhere to be found. Could you let me know, how you integrate the X400 with Unraid? How can one set the X400 to DAS mode? Thanks for your support!

I am desperately waiting for this functionality so that I can build a second array, place larger disks in there and move data disk by disk to the second array. 😀

Is there an ETA for the Multiple Array feature? I am eagerly waiting for it.

Parts of the data is documents and documentation, which could be compressed massively. But with performance issues that won't help me. 😁 Thanks for your answers.

Thanks a lot! Do you happen to know what wget-at-gnutls is doing? It's popping in and out in top.

I was not aware of performance issues with ZFS. Thanks for letting know. Where do you have the information from? I am looking for the compression functionality in ZFS. But I am not in a hurry.

Okay, I guess I identified one issues on my own - the find process came from the Dynamix Cache DIrectories plugin. But the high CPU load from shfs is still there, even after changing /mnt/user to /mnt/cachea in the Docker and VM settings ( Any idea?