jtech007

I am getting this error when trying to start the container, any ideas where the conflict is? a8d5e9a99838374d4445051a6f3b1356905769aa8bc2ec6427c90fb434ca5ada time="2015-08-29T12:02:57-07:00" level=fatal msg="Error response from daemon: Cannot start container a8d5e9a99838374d4445051a6f3b1356905769aa8bc2ec6427c90fb434ca5ada: Error starting userland proxy: listen tcp 0.0.0.0:80: bind: address already in use" The command failed. Running one windows VM with nothing installed on it yet. Other containers are: Crashplan, Emby and SAB

Try a different port -> ie: if you're currently plugging into a USB3 port try a USB2 port. Funny, I read a lot of threads on switching USB ports to solve the problem and most, if not all said to take it out of a USB3 and put in a USB2. I tried all the USB2 ports with no luck and never bothered to try the USB3 ports until you suggested to try a different port. Put it in a USB3 port and it fired right up. Amazing and thank you for the suggestion!

Tried to upgrade through the UI and also fresh installs of multiple USB sticks and I keep getting this error: /dev/disk/by-label/UNRAID where it's not mounting the USB drive. I have two HP sticks that work great with beta15 and one Sony stick that also boots beta15. I boot all of them directly off the MB and the system is showing all 32gb of ram. Any idea why other, older versions would work but the RC version will not mount the USB drive?

Looks like Amazon is your best bet.

Check this out: http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php/Hardware_Compatibility#PCI_SATA_Controllers

I am not sure if those will work but another option is used M1015 or Dell Perc cars off of eBay. Flash to IT mode and known to work with unRaid.

I believe that model (and the 340T) allow for each port to be passed through individually as there is a controller for each port on the card. The VT, PT and others have multiple ports as well, but I believe the limitation is they have one controller for each pair of ports. So when you pass them through they need to be teamed up and not passed through one at a time. That's not an issue typically on bare metal, but in a VM it helps to be able to use each one when PCIE ports are limited.

Great post OP, subscribed. I would also like to see what the community comes back with on this topic.

I just built a new machine with the following , ECS NM70-i 1gb ram 4x3tb hdd its a mini itx build. it runs unraid 5.0.5 just fine , soon as i try beta 6 release 10a it blows up with this error. hebergement image Quick question, did you try to upgrade 5 to 6a without removing your old 5x plugins? I have this exact same problem when upgrading from 5.0.5 to any of the 6.0 versions. Ended up being the flash drive as I installed 6.0 on a few others and it worked. Which reminds me I need to ask Tom to move that license to one that does work.

Good info, I will look at the asrock lineup as well.

Please post your findings when you get something setup. That mobo and processor(s) might work in my case as well.

I will have to check out KVM as I am not familiar with it. Sounds like fun though.

I have read through that thread a few times. Out of the 23 setups there, only one mentions the 990fx chipset and two mention using Supermicro motherboards. And several note "working" setups but their sig's note newer equipment that may or may not work for what *I* need. Looking for more insight on the 990fx setups and any new Supermicro or other boards that are newer and might work with 4+ PCIe slots.

I am looking to upgrade from my older, low power setup so I can run VM's in either ESXI or Xen (yet to be determined). I am looking for suggestions on which motherboard I should get based on the following: Will need to run unRaid, Windows 7, XBMC with passthrough for two PCIe video cards (one for windows one for XBMC) and also have room for two M1015's. I have been looking at the Gigabyte 990fx line and cant decide if the UD3 will be enough slots for all of that as I will need to add a NIC as well. Maybe the UD5 or UD7 would be better/more flexible? The other, more expensive route obviously is to go the Supermicro route but I am not sure which board would have enough PCIe slots to run 4-5 cards at once and not kill performance. I would assume the AMD Fx chips with 8 cores would be enough to assign two cores to the Unraid and XBMC clients and leave 4 for the windows client. I am not sure what CPU Intel has that would allow that without spending a ton of $$$ on an 8 core offering. Any help, suggestions or working builds you can post would be a big help!

Just tried changing the speed and the modes. Still ends up locking up with the Kernel Panic. Still odd that it would work with 5.0.5 but not with beta's. Oh and I pulled my current stable 5.0.5 stick and put beta9 on it and it booted right up. I think this other one is a no-go for whatever changed between the final version of 5 and the beta's of 6.

Still not working with beta9. Tried on a Supermicro motherboard and get the same result as the Asus. Attached some photos as there was no log to get. Thanks again for all your help! May have to hit up Tom for swapping this one out for another drive.

I noticed this late last night as I was looking for another beta (6 or 7) to download and try but nothing was posted on the lime-tech page to download. Thank you for the heads up! The drive in question is a Sandisk Cruser 2Gb. This is the one that works with 5.0.5 but doesn't with beta8

Thank you for helping me sort it all out. I am 50/50 on keeping it as it would be nice down the road to have the option to have those PCIe slots open for other devices.

I have a mix of older and newer 1-4tb drives. Hitachi (4tb), WD (1tb) and WD cache drive (750gb). The motherboard is a Asus M4A89GTD PRO that has USB 3.0. The unRAID connection happens on the motherboard via an old dual usb header. No UEFI in the bios from what I can tell.

I am currently running 2 M1015's on in 2 PCI-E 8x slots on an Asus M4A89GTD PRO Motherboard bought years ago for low power usage and inexpensive unRAID server. I am in the process of collecting new parts to venture in to the world of VM's through ESXI or Xen. I doubt I would ever use the SAS backplane for it's true intention which is high speed drives in an Enterprise environment. I just wanted to make sure I was not sitting on a great piece of hardware for unRAID and some VM's. It would seem that the SAS expander is overkill for what I need. Another similar chassis with the same backplane just sold for $500 on eBay tonight. Mine has that plus it's a working server with a lot of extras. Seems like it would make more sense to sell it an use the $ to buy parts that fit more with what I am going to use it all for, right?

Thank you for the reply! So if I understand correctly the SAS backplane takes the place of say an Intel RES2SV240 expander? So I would run one cable from the M1015 to the backplane to control all 24 drives? And in your opinion would 2-3 M1015's and my current SATA backplane be faster for 24 drives (eventually) and/or more ideal for unRAID and VM's or would the SAS expander backplane with one M1015 be a better solution? I am going to sell one chassis or the other just thinking through it all before I get rid of the other one.

I picked up a Supermicro 4U 24 Bay server the other day. I was checking out the backplane and noticed it's an SAS model that is different from the SATA connections on the one that I bought years ago from Tam's. The model number is SAS846EL2 and if I am reading the user guide correctly http://www.supermicro.com/manuals/other/BPN-SAS-846EL.pdf in some instances I should be able to control all 24 drives with one cable? Is that true and would I need a controller that will do all 24 drives with one connection? I run M1015's now but I am curious if this backplane would be superior to my SATA backplane with a lot less cables and maybe cards. Edit: Looks like Tam's sold a similar one on eBay recently. http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Supermicro-24-Bay-Chassis-SAS846EL2-SAS-4U-JBPWR2-Server-/171348859970 Though it looks like a JBOD setup with the cards on the rear and no motherboard. Any help or insight would be a big help. Thanks!

I have a good, working setup with a pro license on 5.0.5. I purchased a second license from Tom a few months ago and am now getting around to testing out 6.0-beta8 on the second license and have run in to a problem: 1: The USB flash drive I assigned the second license to boots to the tower login and can be accessed from the webGUI with a fresh install of 5.0.5. This had to work originally for me to get the GUID for Tom to assign the license so I know it worked in April and it works now. 2: When I do a fresh install of 6.0-beta8 on the same USB flash drive the system gets the Kernel Panic error and locks up. I tested the USB flash drive with check disk and no errors are reported. I also took another USB flash drive I had and installed a fresh install of 6.0-beta8 on it and it booted to the tower login and webGUI works. Any ideas why the USB drive will boot fine with 5.0.5 final but won't boot a beta version but another USB drive will?

I have the 1810, works great and no noise.

No worries and yes I am trying my best to fill up that beast of a server.