Jump to content

David Bott

Members
  • Content Count

    184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About David Bott

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Converted

  • Gender
    Undisclosed

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Ok, I disabled piHole and made it so it would not restart. I then ran the upgrade and restarted. I seem to be good. SpeedTest does not work, but I see that is an issue and I need to upgrade python. I turned piHole back on and all is still well. Very pondering to say the least!!!!!! Thank you kindly for the thought! I would not have expected it.
  2. Interesting....But not sure why it would have an issue with it in 6.7.X and no issue with it in 6.6.7. And it is not all of the functions. I can download updates just fine etc, but then Speed Disk, which is not a docker, does not work nor do any of the dockers. I can try disabling it and then upgrading and see what happens. Be right back.
  3. First off.... Ha! Yes, as a docker. ????? Interesting. Where is your thought on this one?
  4. Actually, just an FYI, unRAID never recreated a network config file. It is not in the CONFIG directory. Here is what WAS in it however on ver 6.6.7.... # Generated settings: USE_DHCP="yes" IPADDR="192.168.1.200" NETMASK="255.255.255.0" GATEWAY="192.168.1.1" DHCP_KEEPRESOLV="no" DNS_SERVER1="192.168.1.1" DNS_SERVER2="" DNS_SERVER3="" BONDING="no" BONDING_MODE="1" BRIDGING="no" BRNAME="br0" BRSTP="yes" BRFD="0"
  5. As I wrote above...."I have tried deleting the network config file so it would be forced to make a new one. Rebooted the server, still same issue.:"
  6. Hi... Some of the services on unRAID in 6.7.X do not seem to have access to the Internet. For example, "Community Applications" works and pulls things down, yet the simple SpeedDisk Tool nor any of my dockers have access. The server itself seems fine as it will download the UnRAID version upgrade and seems well. Had seen a "similar issue" reported in another thread that really did not have a resolve. I even asked if it was resolved in 6.7.1 and then seen there was a 6.7.1 and tried that, same issue. Now I see 6.7.2 and I was thinking that maybe now it is resolved, Nope. Below is the thread. Someone mentioned it was the USB drive. To me, that makes no logical sense. They also mention to check the BIOS settings, which I have not done yet as I need to pull the server to move it so I can plug it in to see the screen. But why would a BIOS change make a difference seeing all is well in 6.6.7 not not in 6.7.X? (I don't even know if the BIOS has an "IOMMU" setting. Whatever that is. ) I have tried deleting the network config file so it would be forced to make a new one. Rebooted the server, still same issue. Downgrading back to 6.6.7 and everything works just fine. Thoughts please. I would like to be current of course. Thank you all.
  7. Actually I see there is a 6.7.1...Sorry to say however that the issue is still in that. ????????
  8. I also just had to revet back to 6.6.7. It really makes no sense it would be a USB drive issue seeing that 6.6.7 boots just fine and so do 6.7.0, it is just that the server has limited access. For example, I found it interesting I could update my dockers, but the dockers themselves could not reach the Internet. So this seems to be a Docker integration issue. I am kind of surprised that we have not heard anything from unRAID on this nor has a 6.7.1 come out to fix it as it yet. (Unless I totally missed something post by unRAID on it and how to actually fix it.)
  9. This is the thread that I posted about it on Emby...They just locked it with 19K views in 10 days and the thread was blowing up. It seems others were affected and it also came out that they new about this IN BETA yet still released it!!!! https://emby.media/community/index.php?/topic/70869-emby-just-deleted-all-of-my-movies/ The last thing posted in the thread before they locked it was... The hot fix is now available, anyone concerned you can update now. If you want to see better delete handling please comment in the following feature request: https://emby.media/community/index.php?/topic/70967-better-delete-handling/ The current idea is to have a confirmation prompt listing the files that will be deleted.
  10. That's the whole point...It was not suppose to delete anything, only update. I asked it to update all the metadata and it went though and removed everything. BAM! I wanted to post here as a heads up because my fear also was that someone have it set to run full refreshes on a timer or something to get current new art. (No idea if it would be the same script...but still...a major heads up.) I was shocked to say the least and reported it to them and it was confirmed that, yeah, they mucked up they apologized for the "Disruption". Nothing more they could do. It sucks...but thats about it. Yes, I know I do not have a secondary backup for movies or tv, I understand what unraid is, I was very upset at the time as you all may guess. I lost 17TB of data. At least now I have 21TB left I guess and don't need to buy a new drive. (I am trying to make myself feel better, can you tell? ) We live now, last 5 years, full time in a motor coach. So while it would be nice to have two servers, don't have the physical space. But I do have off site backups of the important files and videos and photos and business stuff. Seeing we use three JetPacks for data (Two AT&T, One Verizon, all unlimited set up as a Bonded VPN for speed.) Data wise, really can't afford to download a movie or TV show and then upload a backup to crashplan. It's just a lot of use. OH....They said... "It is already resolved for the next release so that it will not happen again."... can't wait for the new Docker! (What gets me is Luke never posted a single notice, not even in the 4.0.2 release announcement, as to NOT RUN AN UPDATE on the data!) But thank you everyone for the suggestions. I hope this may have saved someone at least.
  11. Now that is a very interesting idea to safeguard from a bug/or otherwise related delete!!! THANKS! Now need to go see how to all apply the setting after it is moved into place!
  12. But does that help you if a docker removes a file though the file system via over samba? As mentioned, I have been a user for a long time. (I founded AVSForum and thus have been with UnRiad from the start.) Happy with unraid. Have backup off site for the "important" stuff. Thus was a notice of an issue with just me saying I wish I had a way.
  13. From my understanding of the Recycle Bin, it is only if deleted via samba. I don't think it would apply in this case unless the Dockers use Simba locally. BTRFS is also not the default and was advised to use new formatting. So that was all switched over. But again, as I mentioned, this was a notice of the issue. I have used unraid a long time, never needed to worry much for the items I need to be sure I have, are backed up off site. It is just amazing to me that something as large as Emby did not find this bug and it would delete main directories when it should be replacing/updating files.
  14. I was not writing to complain about unRaid, just saying it would be nice for them to have a solution of some sort as other systems do. I just wanted to post this here as this version of DOCKER was just released not to long ago and I wanted to be sure people knew about this MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR Bug.