• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

9 Neutral

About timethrow

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thanks for having a look. Its currently in PCIEX1_1 and has also been tested in PCIEX1_2. I did have a USB Expansion Card in that slot before, and any devices connected always seems to show as expected, so it should be working.
  2. I have purchased a Dual NIC and installed it in my unRAID device, however it does not appear to be detecting it and allowing me to use it. I have tried reseating the NIC and moving it to another slot on the Motherboard but no luck. I did install it in another PC as a test and that uses Windows, and it detected it fine. This is the NIC I am using; https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B07Y1P4DGV I can't see anything obvious in the logs, and can see my onboard NIC shows up fine, but could well be missing something. Any help / advice is greatly a
  3. Thanks, thats a shame, as they are quite large disks (3x 14TB & 1x 8TB) so its probably going to take quite a while to rebuild each of them individually. But will give it a go, Thanks. - I was kind of hoping there was an easy way to get unRAID to mount them (as part of the array) and continue from there (even if it meant rebuilding parity), since all of the data is there and its accessible. Errr, thats probably me just not using the right terminology, I have an LSI Card flashed to IT mode and using a couple of spare slots on that (was using it for over a year prior to this as w
  4. Hi, I had some data disks (4 of them) connected via USB, and just shucked them and attached them directly to my RAID Controller. All of the disks, show up and in Unassigned Devices all still have data on etc, but when adding them back to the array (as they now have different identifiers), they show as "Unmountable: Unsupported partition layout". Is there anyway to correct the partitions, without having to format the drives and shuffle all the data around between the drives? I dont have diagnostics right now, but will post them as soon as I can.
  5. Thanks for you help, that is most appreciated. Here are a few screenshots. The first shows the query in use (the main part), if you need more, just let me know. The second, shows the serial numbers in the Data View, but the preview showing the incorrect values (it looks like its trying to format it as a number?) The final one, is something is stumbled on earlier, going on the theory it thinks the serial numbers are numbers/integers (numeric only), and formats it like that, the first drive in the list is the nvme one, which has a Serial Number wit
  6. Hi, Thanks for the continued development of this Dashboard its great, its so nice to have all the info in one place. I have a bit of an odd issue that I can't figure out. I'm using UUD 1.5 (though the issues still appears in 1.6) for me. The Disk Overview section and the SMART Stat Table, dont show the serial numbers of the drives correctly (with the exception of 2 SSDs), they seems to show as NaN or a single number. I thought it was something in my Telegraf Config at first, but noticed that the Temperatures graph show them correctly. I have checked the over
  7. Just updated to the new container this morning, all looks good, no issues from me. I have run my regular network scan and it completed as expected. Thank you for doing that, most appreciated
  8. Heya, Is there any chance the container can be updated to use a more recent version of Nessus please, as the current version reports Vulnerabilities with itself (1 High, 2 Low). I have been manually updating it myself, by downloading the deb file and running "dpkg -i <path_to_deb>" which seems to work, but would be useful to have it done by default. Thanks.
  9. A few suggestions if I may, from my experiences in the Cloud Infrastructure World; First, Reviewing Docker Folder Mappings (and to some extent VM Shares). Do all you Docker Containers need read and write access to non appdata folders? If it does, is the scope of the directories restricted to what is needed, or have you given it full read/write to /mnt/user or /mnt/user0 ? For example I need Sonnarr and Radarr to have write access to my TV and Movie Share, so they are restricted to just that, they don't need access to my Personal Photos, or Documents etc. Whe
  10. Same on 6.9.1 as well, it leaves VNC exposed for anyone on the Network to access unauthenticated, could be a security risk for some.
  11. Another +1 for this. If the VM/Docker Container has no paths mapped to the array, and runs on an unassigned device, allowing it to start with the array running and to continue when the array is stopped would be most useful.
  12. Would it be possible to open all external hyperlinks in a new Tab? For example, I was installing a Docker Container and in the Overview section of the Add Container Page, it had a link to the Docs on GitHub, I clicked on the link and it took me from my unRAID Page to the Git Hub page, ideally, it would open up in a new tab so I can stay on my unRAID page and refer to the docs as well. - I know I can right click and open in a new tab, but I think for external links, this should probably be the default behavior?
  13. Hi, I have pretty much reached the limits of my current build in terms of the number of drives it can hold within the case, and have now got several connect via USB (eek!) and so I want to expand my setup further. I'm quite limited due to my MB, but I have found the QNAP TL-D1600S Expansion DAS online and it looks like this would suit my needs perfectly and allow me to expand with room to spare. It looks like a great enclosure and connects simply to a RAID Card, which they provide along with Cables (SFF-8088). As far as I can tell it looks like it supports JBOD out the
  14. Thanks for that, it has worked. The Data Drive shows as being Emulated and the contents look to be what I would expect, and the emulated files are accessible. The Data Drive is being rebuilt now. Thank you for your help.
  15. Thanks for that. The Original Parity was 10TB and its been replaced with a 14TB drive, which could be some reason for the 30+ hours. Surely, as everything has been copied over and the array has not been able to be started since, there must be some way to "force" it back into the state, as all the data is still there and nothing has changed, its just the unRAID GUI being restrictive. Are you able to provide some info on the Invalid Slot Command please, I might give that a go if I dont get any other results.