cryptothedog Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 (edited) I have seen a lot of people on here that have 4 or 5 storage devices and one cache drive but not nearly enough data to fill them and the data is spread out between all of them....Is there a reason why you would go with multiple storage drives (with the exception of parity) as opposed to just one really large hard drive and one large cache drive (since it is much faster than storage). Is it a performance thing to spread them out across multiple drives in the array? I have about 4tb of data and have a few random 1tb drives that house the data. Is there any reason why I shouldn't just go buy like 2 10tb drives (for parity reasons) and have like 1 large cache drive and that's it to run things off of? Edited November 30, 2021 by cryptothedog Quote Link to comment
whipdancer Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 A lot of times, people start with what they have on hand - several smaller drives. Quote Link to comment
ConnerVT Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 Or, you just can't stand to see all of those empty drive slots in your case. 😝 Quote Link to comment
trurl Posted November 30, 2021 Share Posted November 30, 2021 I usually recommend fewer larger drives. Best to keep some free space on all drives, but no good reason to have lots of drives with little on them. Each additional disk takes additional hardware to connect, at some point additional license, most importantly, each additional disk is an additional point of failure. Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 Another reason (that I don't agree with) is that some people prefer to have a setup where on any given drive, only a certain media type is present. Movies on disks 1-3, TV on disks 4-5 etc Quote Link to comment
cryptothedog Posted December 1, 2021 Author Share Posted December 1, 2021 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Squid said: Another reason (that I don't agree with) is that some people prefer to have a setup where on any given drive, only a certain media type is present. Movies on disks 1-3, TV on disks 4-5 etc Isn't that what the folders created by the shares are for? To organize stuff? lol Edited December 1, 2021 by cryptothedog Quote Link to comment
Frank1940 Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 Today, HD drive capacity has become insanely large. (I believe is reached 18TB!) There is a thought process which every Unraid user should go through. Basically when deciding to build an Unraid server, they should be looking at two things: What am I going to be storing on this server? How fast do I expect my data requirements to grow? The first question is very simple for most people to answer. The second one is real tough one. Modern HD's in Unraid service will have a expected service life approaching five years or, perhaps, a bit more. So if you expect to generate 5TB of new data a year, you need to plan for an initial store capacity of 25TB. If you are looking at 3 data drives and one parity drive. You should size your parity drive at 8-10TB. Start with one data drive and plan to add the second when the first drive is about 75% full. Picking the 75% point allows one to shop for sales. By the time, your array of 3 data drives is nearly full, you can be expecting that some of the drives may be reaching their end-of-life. So you replace parity with a larger drive and, as required, you upgrade the data drives. OR you could add another data drive to the array. But you have set yourself up with a plan that makes sense in the long term. By the way, the failure rates are large capacity HD is about the same as small capacity drives. So an array with fewer drives will always have fewer problems than one with more drives (on a statistical basis)! (Your mileage may vary...) Quote Link to comment
cryptothedog Posted December 1, 2021 Author Share Posted December 1, 2021 6 minutes ago, Frank1940 said: Today, HD drive capacity has become insanely large. (I believe is reached 18TB!) There is a thought process which every Unraid user should go through. Basically when deciding to build an Unraid server, they should be looking at two things: What am I going to be storing on this server? How fast do I expect my data requirements to grow? The first question is very simple for most people to answer. The second one is real tough one. Modern HD's in Unraid service will have a expected service life approaching five years or, perhaps, a bit more. So if you expect to generate 5TB of new data a year, you need to plan for an initial store capacity of 25TB. If you are looking at 3 data drives and one parity drive. You should size your parity drive at 8-10TB. Start with one data drive and plan to add the second when the first drive is about 75% full. Picking the 75% point allows one to shop for sales. By the time, your array of 3 data drives is nearly full, you can be expecting that some of the drives may be reaching their end-of-life. So you replace parity with a larger drive and, as required, you upgrade the data drives. OR you could add another data drive to the array. But you have set yourself up with a plan that makes sense in the long term. By the way, the failure rates are large capacity HD is about the same as small capacity drives. So an array with fewer drives will always have fewer problems than one with more drives (on a statistical basis)! (Your mileage may vary...) Great insight! Thanks, I hadn't really thought of it like that. I was mainly just curious if there was some sort of performance benefit or if people just liked storing random stuff on random drives...still doesn't make sense for the ones that have like 6 drives and 10% of each is full. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.